Abstract
Background To date, no study has examined the effectiveness of social distancing, while controlling for social mobility and social distancing restrictions in the United States. We utilize the quasi-experimental setting created by the nationwide protests precipitated by George Floyd’s tragic death on May 25, 2020, to assess the causal impact of social distancing on the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Methods Our sample period spans from January 22, 2020, to June 20, 2020, and consists of 474,422 county-days representing 3,142 counties from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. To assess the change in COVID-19 case counts following the protests, we employ a differences-in-differences estimation strategy in a multivariate setting, in which we control for social distancing restrictions and social mobility across counties. We also control for covariates that may influence SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and implement placebo tests using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Findings We document a country-wide increase of over 3·06 cases per day, per 100,000 population, following the onset of the protests (95%CI: 2·47–3·65), and a further increase of 1·73 cases per day, per 100,000 population, in the counties in which the protests took place (95%CI: 0·59–2·87). Relative to the week preceding the onset of the protests, this represents a 61·2% country-wide increase in COVID-19 cases, and a further 34·6% increase in the protest counties.
Interpretation Our study documents a significant increase in COVID-19 case counts in counties that experienced a protest, and we conclude that social distancing practices causally impact the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The observed effect cannot be explained by changes in social distancing restrictions and social mobility, and placebo tests rule out the possibility that this finding is attributable to chance.
Funding We acknowledge the financial support from the Smith School of Business Distinguished Faculty Fellowship at Queen’s University.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
LG acknowledges the financial support from the Smith School of Business Distinguished Faculty Fellowship at Queen's University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research uses only publicly available data that is provided without any identifiers or groups of identifiers.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study uses publicly accessible data exclusively.
https://github.com/descarteslabs/DL-COVID-19
https://github.com/COVID19StatePolicy/SocialDistancing
http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/united-states-hypertension-estimates-county-2001-2009
http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/united-states-smoking-prevalence-county-1996-2012
http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/united-states-diabetes-prevalence-county-1999-2012
https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/tree/master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_time_series
