Abstract
Background Matching to a residency is a great success, but it is also a significant change in the lives of many graduating medical students. It is expected that during this time, many priorities may change, especially after participation in a residency program where residents are further exposed to the dynamics of the program.
Purpose There are no current studies that attempt to determine what factors residents prefer after the match.
Methods This study was an anonymous study conducted through an online survey. The survey asked two open-ended questions asking the survey taker to list four factors in order of importance that they considered important in a program, one as an MS4 and one as a resident. Results were compiled, tallied, and categorized to find common themes between the applicant’s preferences through descriptive statistics.
Results Of the 24 surveys sent out, a total of 15 applicants responded for a response rate of 62.5%. The most common preferences among both MS4s were “Work Environment” and “Location,” however, factors like “Education” and “Faculty: Resident Ratio” was seen as increasing in importance among residents.
Conclusion While an increase was seen in some factors (Education, Faculty:Residency Ratio, and Program Size), the general trend of preferences going from MS4 to a resident was more spread-out in the distribution of what residents considered essential factors. Education involves both formal didactics and readout of dictated exams. Higher Faculty:Residency affects education because more faculty decreases the clinical workload of each faculty and leaves the faculty more time for teaching. Larger program size decreases the amount of call burdern per resident.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB Exempt by UTMB IRB, IRB # 18-0198
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Principal Investigator Biography: Dr. Quan Nguyen served as Radiology Residency Program Director for the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX from 2016 to 2020. Dr. Nguyen attended medical school at the Tulane School of Medicine in New Orleans, LA. He completed his residency at State University of New York, Downstate in Brooklyn, NY, and a breast imaging fellowship at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA. Dr. Nguyen is a radiologist with sub specialization in breast imaging interested in the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
IRB: IRB Exempt by UTMB IRB, IRB # 18-0198
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.