Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives

View ORCID ProfileMarek Kochańczyk, View ORCID ProfileTomasz Lipniacki
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.27.20141747
Marek Kochańczyk
Department of Biosystems and Soft Matter, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marek Kochańczyk
  • For correspondence: mkochan@ippt.pan.pl tlipnia@ippt.pan.pl
Tomasz Lipniacki
Department of Biosystems and Soft Matter, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tomasz Lipniacki
  • For correspondence: mkochan@ippt.pan.pl tlipnia@ippt.pan.pl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Countries worldwide have adopted various strategies to minimize the socio-economic impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Stringency of imposed measures universally reflects the standpoint from which protecting public health and saving economy are seen as contradictory objectives. We analyzed epidemic trajectories of 25 highly developed countries and 10 US states in the mobility reduction vs. reproduction number plane to show that the consequence of delayed lockdown is a surge of infections and deaths, that is ultimately suppressed by stringent and long-lasting quarantine. As a consequence, cumulative mobility reduction and population-normalized cumulative number of COVID-19-associated deaths are significantly correlated and this correlation increases with time. We thus demonstrated that, as long as epidemic suppression is the aim, the trade-off between the death toll and economic loss is illusory: high death toll correlates with deep and long-lasting lockdown and severe economic downturn.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Science Centre (Poland) grant 2018/29/B/NZ2/00668.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

(N/A)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • The manuscript has been updated using (1) more recent epidemiological data. Also, new data on GDP reduction in the first half of 2020 (unavailable at the time of initial submission) have been incorporated to support assumed methodology: (2) GDP loss turned out to be highly correlated with cumulative mobility reduction, meaning that the latter quantity is a good and quick predictor of economic loss. In the revised manuscript we also demonstrated that (3) GDP loss is correlated with (the square root) of the population-normalized cumulative number of deaths associated with COVID-19, strengthening support for article thesis: when the epidemic eradication or suppression is the objective, there is no trade-off between public health costs and economic loss.

Data Availability

All data are available within the article.

https://github.com/kochanczyk/covid19-pareto/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 01, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives
Marek Kochańczyk, Tomasz Lipniacki
medRxiv 2020.06.27.20141747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.27.20141747
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives
Marek Kochańczyk, Tomasz Lipniacki
medRxiv 2020.06.27.20141747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.27.20141747

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (201)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (492)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (90)
  • Dermatology (57)
  • Emergency Medicine (169)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (216)
  • Epidemiology (5733)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (217)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (873)
  • Geriatric Medicine (89)
  • Health Economics (232)
  • Health Informatics (769)
  • Health Policy (396)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (254)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (185)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6542)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (394)
  • Medical Education (119)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (93)
  • Neurology (854)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (142)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (165)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (263)
  • Oncology (516)
  • Ophthalmology (165)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (107)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (22)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (253)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (147)
  • Primary Care Research (116)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (983)
  • Public and Global Health (2253)
  • Radiology and Imaging (378)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (313)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (82)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)