Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Silk fabric as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic

Adam F. Parlin, Samuel M. Stratton, Theresa M. Culley, Patrick A. Guerra
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.20136424
Adam F. Parlin
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel M. Stratton
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa M. Culley
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick A. Guerra
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: patrick.guerra@uc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The worldwide shortage of single-use N95 respirators and surgical masks due to the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many health care personnel to prolong the use of their existing equipment as much as possible. In many cases, workers cover respirators with available masks in an attempt to extend their effectiveness against the virus. Due to low mask supplies, many people instead are using face coverings improvised from common fabrics. Our goal was to determine what fabrics would be most effective in both practices.

Methods and findings We examined the hydrophobicity of fabrics (silk, cotton, polyester), as measured by their resistance to the penetration of small and aerosolized water droplets, an important transmission avenue for the virus causing COVID-19. We also examined the breathability of these fabrics and their ability to maintain hydrophobicity despite undergoing repeated cleaning. Tests were done when fabrics were fashioned as an overlaying barrier and also when constructed as do-it-yourself face coverings. As a protective barrier and face covering, silk is more effective at impeding the penetration and absorption of droplets due to its greater hydrophobicity relative to other tested fabrics. Silk face coverings repelled droplets as well as masks, but unlike masks they are hydrophobic and can be readily sterilized for immediate reuse.

Conclusions Silk is an effective hydrophobic barrier to droplets, more breathable than other fabrics that trap humidity, and are readily re-useable via cleaning. Therefore, silk can serve as an effective material for protecting respirators under clinical conditions and as a material for face coverings.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No specific IRB and/or ethics committee approvals were needed for this work.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant data are found within the paper and its Supporting information files.

  • Abbreviations

    EW
    essential worker
    HCP
    health care provider
    PPE
    personal protective equipment
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted June 29, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Silk fabric as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Silk fabric as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Adam F. Parlin, Samuel M. Stratton, Theresa M. Culley, Patrick A. Guerra
    medRxiv 2020.06.25.20136424; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.20136424
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Silk fabric as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Adam F. Parlin, Samuel M. Stratton, Theresa M. Culley, Patrick A. Guerra
    medRxiv 2020.06.25.20136424; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.25.20136424

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Public and Global Health
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (161)
    • Allergy and Immunology (416)
    • Anesthesia (91)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (860)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
    • Dermatology (98)
    • Emergency Medicine (250)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (394)
    • Epidemiology (8566)
    • Forensic Medicine (4)
    • Gastroenterology (385)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1755)
    • Geriatric Medicine (167)
    • Health Economics (373)
    • Health Informatics (1245)
    • Health Policy (622)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (468)
    • Hematology (196)
    • HIV/AIDS (376)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10306)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
    • Medical Education (192)
    • Medical Ethics (51)
    • Nephrology (212)
    • Neurology (1679)
    • Nursing (97)
    • Nutrition (252)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (326)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (451)
    • Oncology (929)
    • Ophthalmology (263)
    • Orthopedics (102)
    • Otolaryngology (172)
    • Pain Medicine (114)
    • Palliative Medicine (40)
    • Pathology (253)
    • Pediatrics (536)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (254)
    • Primary Care Research (208)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1772)
    • Public and Global Health (3845)
    • Radiology and Imaging (624)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (320)
    • Respiratory Medicine (521)
    • Rheumatology (208)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (168)
    • Sports Medicine (158)
    • Surgery (190)
    • Toxicology (36)
    • Transplantation (101)
    • Urology (76)