Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review

Introduction

COVID-19, which first became public in December 2019, was declared a pandemic on the 12^th of March 2020 (WHO, 2020a), by which time the infectious disease had resulted in approximately 278,000 deaths worldwide (WHO, 2020b). Due to the rapid growth in the number of infections of Covid-19, lockdowns with home-confinement and social distancing were implemented (some still are implemented in many countries at time of authorship), in order to slow the spread of the virus, and to conserve treatment possibilities in public hospitals (Jiang et al., 2020). Practically this mean that gyms, public parks and schools were closed (Yarimkaya & Esenturk, 2020), among other facilities. This situation would negatively affect children and youth, who normally have an active lifestyle through active transport, school-related activities and sport participation (Hofman et al., 2019). Reduced physical activity as a result from social isolation measures is a serious concern particularly for older adults too, as they are typically more inactive compared to younger aged individuals and more prone to chronic diseases (Roschel et al., 2020). Results from a multicultural questionnaire, which was spread across Europe, Western Asia, North-Africa and to America, indicates that home confinement and social isolation measures could negatively affect all levels of physical activity (vigorous, moderate, walking and overall), along with increased daily sitting time by more than 28 percent (Ammar et al., 2020). A quantitative measurement of average steps for the duration of one week at the end of March 2020, assessed with the device Fitbit©, compared to the same period a year before, which analysed data from 30 million people, shows a fundamental reduction in average steps in almost all countries (Fitbit, Inc., 2020).

Research shows that physical inactivity is a high-risk factor for major disease morbidity (Hallal et al., 2012). A large-scale, prospective study has demonstrated when 30 min of day of sitting time is replaced by 30 minutes of day light-intensity PA a 24 percentage lower mortality-risk from cardiovascular causes (Dohrn et al., 2018). In summation, regular physical activity is healthy for the mind and the body (e.g. reducing high blood pressure, helping in managing weight, reducing risk of type 2 diabetes, stroke, heart disease, and various cancers), which are all variables that can increase susceptibility to the pandemic (WHO, 2020c). With some predictions estimating that the Covid-19 pandemic could possibly persist for 18 months (Ferguson et al., 2020), the negative impact on performing physical activity and increased sedentary behavior could persist with a serious detrimental affect on health. Therefore, practical recommendations for the performance of PA in times of a pandemic, such as Covid-19 are needed.

To our knowledge, no study to date has examined the possible relationship between quarantine/social isolation and the undertaking of deliberate physical activities within the home environment during these specialised conditions. Nevertheless, some tentative practical recommendations can be made based on the existing scholarly literature. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the existing literature about possible practical recommendations for being physically active during this period of isolation.

In order to exploit scientific literature for this task, two research questions arise:

Q1. What has already been published in scientific journals regarding practical recommendations for physical activity during social distancing and home-confinement in the COVID-19 pandemic? Which recommendations or choices can be extracted?

Q2. Which topics and key factors for the performance of physical activities can be identified in journal articles for possible transfer to the present Covid-19 situation?

Methods

The literature search was performed on May 16^th, 2020 in the databases Pubmed/MEDLINE and Web of Science. There were no restrictions for study design, setting, country or time frame. For better quality, the MeSH (medical subject headings) thesaurus is used when possible.

We based the search strategy on the psychological construct “situation”, as defined by the component’s “person”, “environment” and “task”, which has been introduced for physical activity by Nitsch (2005). Brach et al (2017) applied this simple framework for describing how these components enable but also constrain a room for maneuver in individual mobility. Regarding the present topic, we didn’t apply search terms for the “person” component, because we didn’t have a special target group in mind. Regarding the “environment” component, we used four OR-combined terms. Three were MeSH Terms. The corresponding scope notes are:

• patient isolation (D010356): “The segregation of patients with communicable or other diseases for a specified time. Isolation may be strict, in which movement and social contacts are limited; modified, where an effort to control specified aspects of care is made in order to prevent cross infection; or reverse, where the patient is secluded in a controlled or germ-free environment in order to protect him or her from cross infection.”

• social isolation (D012934): “The separation of individuals or groups resulting in the lack of or minimizing of social contact and/or communication. This separation may be accomplished by physical separation, by social barriers and by psychological mechanisms. In the latter, there may be interaction but no real communication. “

• pandemics (D058873): “Epidemics of infectious disease that have spread to many countries, often more than one continent, and usually affecting a large number of people. “

Additionally, we added a fourth keyword for the research in the titles and abstracts, in order to find all articles related to confinement phases:

• “confinement”

The “task” component of the situation framework regards to physical activity. We referred to a search strategy from another review (Hinrichs & Brach 2012), who used the OR-combined MeSH terms “exercise”; “sports”; “physical activity”; physical fitness”; “motor activity”. In testing runs however, we missed papers which included physical activity, but not as a topic. Thus, we changed from MeSH terms to “search in title and abstract” and skipped “motor activity”.

The final search term for Pubmed was (“patient isolation”[MeSH Terms] OR “social isolation”[MeSH Terms] OR “confinement” [Title/Abstract] OR “pandemics”[MeSH Terms]) AND (“exercise”[Title/Abstract] OR “sports”[Title/Abstract] OR “physical activity”[Title/Abstract]).

The final search term for WebofScience (Topic search) was (“patient isolation” OR “social isolation” OR “pandemics” OR “confinement”) AND (“exercise” OR “sports” OR “physical activity” OR “physical fitness” OR “motor activity”).

We found 585 studies in PubMed/MEDLINE and 857 in the Web of Science (See Prisma Flow Diagram, figure 1). We uploaded them into the data management software Rayyan QCRI (Ouzzani et al., 2016) to analyze the data systematically. After removing 236 duplicates, there were 1.206 studies left. Two researchers (EB and MB) marked inclusion and exclusion independently. After this procedure, 998 studies were independently excluded and 179 conflicting marks were discussed and solved. Exclusion rules were animal and physiological studies, studies on diseases (e.g. autism) leading to social isolation, papers solely describing or analyzing the isolated situation, but without intervention.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: PRISMA flow chart

After this screening procedure, 50 studies were left in the database. We found 47 full-texts, resulting in the other three abstract-only studies being excluded. After full-text scanning, a further 15 studies did not match with inclusion rules and were excluded. The remaining papers were six studies which explicitly dealt with physical activity (PA) in the Covid-19 pandemic (see table 1), and 26 articles which discussed PA-topics with the potential to adapt to the Covid-19 situation (see table 2).

Results

This systematic review gathered all data to practical recommendations for performing physical activity directly related to the Covid-19 restrictions and also to other isolation and confinement. Therefore, in the following paragraphs, we sketch the articles relating to question 1, practical recommendations for staying active during the Covid-19 pandemic, and summarise major points in table 1. After this procedure and with regard to the research question 2, we grouped the studies, which do not directly refer to the Covid-19 pandemic but could be adapted in relation to PA to the present situation into 5 topics (see table 2).

Discussion

The primary goal of this review was to identify practical recommendations of studies for “Staying Active” during Covid-19. We can summarize that regular daily routines and exercises should be carried out in daylight. When it is allowed, people should perform their exercises as often as possible outside, in nature (e.g. walking or jogging). For monitoring the steps per day (5,000 steps per day should be a realistic goal for healthy individuals), activity trackers should be used. The intensity of all activities should be mild to moderate. Other exercises, such as strength training, should be in addition, conducted with an intensity from low to medium. Further, relaxion activities are relevant to reduce the stress-level, which is in times of this pandemic often high (Rajkumar, 2020).

Our search indicates, that community-based programs have the potential to decrease the feeling of isolation and the stress-levels. In the situation of home-confinement, exergames, are a perfect innovation which should have the integrated function of a group play modus. Effects are higher levels of PA and an increase of a feeling of social belonging for older adults, including those with mental illness. Smart technologies also have the potential to better manage and understand health conditions. It should be considered that the family doctor have access to the results of the PA program and the health condition, such as results from a heartrate monitor. With, or even without internet-assess, Tai Chi is another possible exercise which can be adapted to different skills and different ages. Dancing shows positive effects, such as a reduction of the feeling of social isolation, especially for patients with depressions. Telephone supervision or text messages should be established between health-care professionals and patients. Exercises are useful to counteract against psycho-physiological changes and higher self-control -level during phases of confinement.

In relation to the secondary question, we generated 5 topics which bundle information from examples of non-digital and digital PA programs, space-simulation, and real-life isolation scenarios, which all present useful results adoptable to the pandemic restrictive conditions. When creating a PA program, it is important to explain first about the benefits of the exercise. Realistic individual goals need to be established. Notably digital community exercise programs have the potential to motivate individuals and to reduce their feeling of loneliness, even if they train from their home. Best scenarios would integrate family members, because this leads to more motivation and an increased effort time for conducting PA. Government actions should promote PA as a health-care priority. Especially to vulnerable individuals, such as elderly and patients with diseases who may require a longer duration of isolation, in order to avoid virus transmission.

For phases of home-isolation in the pandemic, practical materials for possible exercises of home-based programs are recommended, which can be accessed from the World Health Organisation (WHO), the American Heart Association (AHA), or the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM): The training advice from the WHO (2020c) are general (e.g. exercise classes online; dance to music; play active video games; strength & balance training). For duration, they advise for health adults 30 minutes per day PA, and for children one hour. In addition to that, some practical ideas that should be established are communicated, such as regular standing breaks, walking up and down the stairs, or the use of skipping ropes. The AHA invites people to join on virtual workshop (AHA, 2020a) for different workouts (e.g. full-body workout, lower body tone workout, stretch workout). In addition, they offer useful exercises and explanations in their videos, such as a sofa stretch or chair dips. Moreover, they compare activities in and around the house for times of pandemic restrictions with the following real-life-scenarios:

• “10 minutes of stretching is like walking the length of a football field”

• “2.5 hours of walking every week for a year is like walking across the state of Wyoming”

• “30 minutes of singles tennis is like walking a 5K”

• “1 hour of dancing every week for a year is like walking from Chicago to Indianapolis”

• “20 minutes of vacuuming is like walking one mile”

• “30 minutes of grocery shopping every other week for a year is like walking a marathon” (AHA, 2020b)

Through these comparisons, the reader can be motivated to be more active, which is an important pre-condition for conducting PA. They have a home-based exercise program (AHA, 2020c), with one challenge targeted at children to be active at home (AHA, 2020d). Practical tips for the whole family are discussed, such as active chore cards, fitness during TV, active games (e.g. twister), or playing with pets (AHA, 2020e).

The ACSM lists at the beginning of the page some links to other blogs and videos for staying active at home during Covid-19 (ACSM, 2020a). The rest of the content is rather general about recommended activities in a normal situation, omitting the pandemic restrictions.

Conclusion

The reduced PA levels, along with increased sedentary behavior have been identified as a crucial consequence of home confinement in pandemic time to overall health. This review aimed to summarise the literature for practical recommendations on staying active during times of a pandemic. Some effort has been made to help people find some alternatives to ensure that they can stay active during such times. The results provided in this review demonstrate a small but rapidly growing body of evidence around some practical recommendations for performing PA in times of pandemics such as Covid-19. The information, especially those from WHO and AHA are for the current pandemic really helpful. When comparing the results from the different organisations and the reviewed literature, there is a gap which need to be filled with special recommendations for older adults and individuals with diseases, with explanations on the task, duration, intensity and positive effects of the exercises. This knowledge needs to be disseminated more broadly into the world. Also, to be considered, are the development of exergames which combine a social belonging element with PA programs at home in times of home confinement and isolation. This paper helps researchers, to identify activities to recommend in times of home-confinement.