Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Statements issued by academic medical institutions after George Floyd’s killing by police and subsequent unrest in the United States: cross-sectional study

View ORCID ProfileMathew V. Kiang, View ORCID ProfileAlexander C. Tsai
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.20137844
Mathew V. Kiang
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
2Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
3FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mathew V. Kiang
Alexander C. Tsai
4Center for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
5Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
6Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander C. Tsai
  • For correspondence: actsai@partners.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The horrific nature of George Floyd’s killing by a Minneapolis Police Department officer on May 25, 2020 has sparked more than a month of nationwide protests against police brutality and in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. At critical junctures of the nation’s public health such as these, academic medical institutions may exert leadership by issuing public statements to communicate institutional values.

Methods We obtained statements issued by 56 leading U.S. medical schools relevant to George Floyd’s killing and subsequent protests. We tokenized statements into words, n-grams of sizes 2 and 3, and sentences; removed non-informative stop words and words that would compromise de-identification; and stemmed the remaining words using the Porter algorithm. We followed a predefined set of rules for identifying important elements of these statements related to leadership in antiracism and public health.

Results Nearly all named George Floyd (50 [89%]), a majority noted the role of racism (43 [77%]) and acknowledged the Black community specifically (41 [73%]). Fewer ╌ slightly more than half ╌ referenced the act resulting in Floyd’s death (31 [55%]) or made explicit reference to the police (29 [52%]). Only 7 (13%) explicitly used terms denoting active support, like “antiracism” or “Black Lives Matter.” Most (45 [80%]) included references to negative sequelae resulting from racism like “disparities” or “inequality”. All included hopeful language.

Conclusion Only a minority of institutions made reference to the killing of George Floyd by the police, and most failed to address this country’s targeted, historically engrained, and sustained oppression of Black people through white supremacy. Thus, our study identifies significant opportunities for U.S. medical schools to exert meaningful leadership in health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded in part by grants from the Sullivan Family Foundation (ACT) and the U.S. National Institutes of Health K99DA051534 (MVK) and U01MD014023 (ACT).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was exempt from IRB review.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Grant support: This study was funded in part by grants from the Sullivan Family Foundation (ACT) and the U.S. National Institutes of Health K99DA051534 (MVK) and U01MD014023 (ACT).

Data Availability

Analysis code is available in the publicly available Github repository corresponding to this analysis.

https://github.com/mkiang/statement_analysis

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 01, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Statements issued by academic medical institutions after George Floyd’s killing by police and subsequent unrest in the United States: cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Statements issued by academic medical institutions after George Floyd’s killing by police and subsequent unrest in the United States: cross-sectional study
Mathew V. Kiang, Alexander C. Tsai
medRxiv 2020.06.22.20137844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.20137844
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Statements issued by academic medical institutions after George Floyd’s killing by police and subsequent unrest in the United States: cross-sectional study
Mathew V. Kiang, Alexander C. Tsai
medRxiv 2020.06.22.20137844; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.20137844

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (240)
  • Allergy and Immunology (521)
  • Anesthesia (125)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1420)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (584)
  • Epidemiology (10297)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (527)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2629)
  • Geriatric Medicine (254)
  • Health Economics (497)
  • Health Informatics (1733)
  • Health Policy (789)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (673)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (565)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12093)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (649)
  • Medical Education (273)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (289)
  • Neurology (2461)
  • Nursing (145)
  • Nutrition (377)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (493)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (568)
  • Oncology (1324)
  • Ophthalmology (401)
  • Orthopedics (146)
  • Otolaryngology (237)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (343)
  • Pediatrics (780)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (330)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2397)
  • Public and Global Health (5007)
  • Radiology and Imaging (893)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (528)
  • Respiratory Medicine (681)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (256)
  • Sports Medicine (245)
  • Surgery (298)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)