Abstract
Background and Purpose From antiquity, the healthcare facilities have treated sick people but there was little awareness about the fact that hospitals generate a lot of hazardous bio-medical waste, which had been disposed without proper guidelines. Lately, it has been a proven thing that bio-medical-waste is a potential hazard for heath-personals, and environment. Therefore, it must be disposed in a proper manner.
Objectives This was an observational study carried out at one of the tertiary care hospitals in Rajgarh city about the knowledge, attitude and practices of the hospital staff about the bio-medical waste management.
Material and method An observational (cross-sectional) study using questionnaires was carried out at one of the non-NABH accredited tertiary care hospitals of Rajgarh City in Rajasthan (India).
Results More than 70% staff (except housekeeping) had good ideas about waste categories, segregation and color coding except in radioactive waste. The house keeping staff did well in 3 categories (Linen, sharps and glasses). Most of the employees has clarity about BMW except the housekeeping staff which did well on most of parameters except barcoding, pretreatment of anatomical/ biotechnology waste, knowledge about STP plant (Sewage treatment plant), Hazmat and signage. On actual hospital rounds we found that the hazmat practices were in a poor shape. Most of staff was aware occupational hazards except housekeeping staff.
Conclusion A written policy, induction training of healthcare workers, constant and repetitive workshops, and motivation are important human factors to implement the biomedical waste practices in a small-scale healthcare organization. Risk-stratification, understanding of health hazards and how to activate hazmat protocols are important things which are to be brought into practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This was a quality improvement exercise and no intervention was used. Ethical approval was taken from the institutional ethical committee and all the measures were taken to ensure Helsinki declaration. Informed and written consent to participate in the study was obtained by the participants. The ethical committee wave off the requirement to register it because it was a routine clinical quality improvement exercise
Funding Statement
No external funding. All funding required (eg printing of stationery/forms, training of participants etc) was done by the owner of hospital where the study was conducted
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional ethical committee of Soni Hospital, Rajgarh provided the ethical approval. But the study did not involve any intervention hence the need to register it into a national /international registry was waved off.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
all relevant data included, any further data can be provided on request
