Abstract
Aim To compare the current indications for intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, to make recommendations for planning of services.
Methodology The medical records of 172 patients who had intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrieved. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted, analysed, and compared with data from the previously published audit report covering 2010 to 2012.
Results Three hundred and thirty injections were given to 182 eyes in this cohort of patients. The mean age was 61.1 ± 16.3 years (range <1-90 years), with a male to female ratio of 1.1:1. Retinal vein occlusion, 64 (35%) remained the most common indication for anti-VEGF injections in the eyes treated. This was followed by choroidal neovascular membrane/ Wet age-related macular degeneration which accounted for 42 (23%) as reported previously. However, cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy/ diabetic maculopathy needing anti-VEGF were noticed to have almost doubled from about 8% (10) in the previous study to 15% (27) in the present study. In addition, idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, 18 (10%) ranked above proliferative sickle cell retinopathy in the present study. Retinopathy of prematurity, neovascular glaucoma, retinal artery macro-aneurysm and myopic choroidal neovascular membrane were the new emerging indications.
Conclusion There is an expanding indication for anti-VEGF in the management of retinal vascular diseases in our health facility and adequate measures should be put in place for early diagnosis and management. Patients should be counselled on the availability of this treatment option.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was available for this review
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Ibadan/University College Hospital Ethical Review Board
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available in SPSS file on request through the corresponding author and approval by the Hospital management.