Abstract
Objectives To investigate whether patterns of National Early Warning Scores (NEWS/NEWS2) in care homes during the COVID pandemic correspond with area-level COVID-19 death registrations from care homes.
Study design Longitudinal ecological study.
Setting 460 Care home units using the same software package to collect data on residents, from 46 local authority areas in England.
Participants 6,464 care home residents with at least one NEWS recording.
Exposure measure 29,656 anonymised person-level NEWS from 29/12/2019 to 20/05/2020 with component physiological measures: systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation. Baseline values for each measure calculated using 80th and 20th centile scores before March 2020.
Outcome measure Time series comparison with Office for National Statistics (ONS) weekly reported registered deaths of care home residents where COVID-19 was the underlying cause of death, and all other deaths (excluding COVID-19) up to 10/05/2020.
Results Deaths due to COVID-19 were registered from 23/03/2020 in the study geographical areas. Between 23/03/2020 and 10/05/2020, there were 5,753 deaths (1,532 involving COVID-19 and 4,221 other causes). The proportion of above-baseline NEWS increased from 16/03/2020 and closely followed the rise and fall in COVID-19 deaths over the study period. The proportion of above-baseline oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and temperature measurements also increased approximately two weeks before peaks in care home deaths in corresponding geographical areas.
Conclusions NEWS may make a useful contribution to disease surveillance in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and temperature could be prioritised as they appear to signal rise in mortality almost as well as total NEWS. This study reinforces the need to collate data from care homes, to monitor and protect residents’ health. Further work using individual level outcome data is needed to evaluate the role of NEWS in the early detection of resident illness.
Introduction
Care homes have experienced high rates of COVID-19 infection and death. In England, over half of excess mortality in the first months of 2020 is estimated to have been in this setting.1 Surveillance of COVID-19 in care homes has been difficult, because of a paucity of testing, and the lack of experience with how this disease presents in older people.2
An increasing number of UK care homes are collecting data on the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). This is a ‘track and trigger’ system used in hospitals in the United Kingdom to identify patients at risk of acute deterioration. NEWS requires the measurement of six parameters: temperature, pulse, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation, along with conscious level. The score generated should trigger a pre-specified response, ranging from repeating the score within a specific timeframe, to seeking urgent medical attention.3 The British Geriatric Society produced guidelines for managing COVID- 19 in care homes for older people. To support triage, they recommend training staff to measure a resident’s vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate) when COVID-19 infection is suspected.4 The risks and benefits of this approach are unknown. In community settings, elevated NEWS scores have been associated with prompt review by a health professional and poor health outcomes.5 Evidence to support the use of NEWS in care homes is limited, and whether it can support care home staff to identify or predict deterioration in the health of residents is unclear.67,8 NEWS observations, particularly measurement of blood pressure, require close contact between residents and care home workers, which may transmit COVID-19 infection.
This study will address the dearth of published evidence on the use of NEWS in any setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.9 The aim is to describe change in NEWS and its components over time and align these data with COVID-19 and all-cause mortality in care homes in England. We address the question of whether NEWS can contribute to surveillance during the pandemic, and whether an abbreviated NEWS (excluding one or more of the component measures) would suffice.
Methods
Study design and setting
We conducted an ecological study using individual level data for the exposure of interest (NEWS) and area level aggregate data for the outcome of interest (all cause and COVID-19 mortality). Participants were all residents of care homes utilising the same commercial software with cloud storage of data, and they all had at least one NEWS recording.10 We did not apply any further population inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Anonymised person-level NEWS (and the slightly modified NEWS2) information were obtained from 01/12/2019-20/05/2020 including the individual component measures of NEWS: blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation. Demographic information on the care home resident (age and sex) were obtained, along with a geographical identifier to examine regional variation. Geographical death data were obtained from Office for National Statistics (ONS) weekly reported registered deaths in care homes due to COVID-19, and all cause deaths (excluding COVID-19) available from week 1 (beginning 29/12/2019), to week 19 (ending 10/05/2020).11 ONS reporting areas and care home geographical labels were mapped as closely as possible.
Analysis
We established baseline levels for NEWS and its component observations, in our population using centile cut points in a random subset of 70% of data collected between 12/2019 and 01/03/2020 (prior to the likely outbreak of COVID-19 in care homes in England). These cut points were then validated in the remaining 30% of observations made before March 2020. NEWS scores above the 80th centile score were defined as above-baseline. For individual physiological observations, upper and lower thresholds were established using the 80th and 20th centile measurements in the same random subset (we calculated the lowest 20th centile only for oxygen saturation). These cut points represent markers of increase in each parameter at a population level and are not measures of individual clinical concern. We removed biologically implausible values from the dataset before creating the centile cut points (Supplemental Table 1). We used quantile regression to measure the impact of age and sex on centile scores but did not find evidence to support age/sex specific 20th and 80th centile cut points in this population (details available from the authors on request).
We calculated the proportion of above-baseline NEWS measurements and the component observations, on a daily and weekly basis across all geographical areas provided. We plotted the proportion of weekly above-baseline measures in participating care homes as a time series against the weekly number of care home deaths due to COVID-19 and all-cause mortality (excluding COVID-19) occurring in the geographical areas present in our data. We calculated the cross-correlation between above-baseline NEWS scores and daily deaths (all causes) for time lags between zero and seven weeks. The individual physiological observations that anticipated COVID-19 mortality trends were combined to see if these could be useful for collection instead of the full NEWS panel.
All data management and analyses were conducted using R version 3.6.312 we used the ccf function in the stats R package to calculate cross-correlations.
Results
Care home population
Care home data were available from 6,464 individuals, 2,007 men (mean age 80.1 years, SD=12.6) and 3,373 women (mean age 83.0 years, SD=12.9). Information on gender was missing from 1,086 (16.8%) people, and age information was missing for 116 (1.8%) people.
Geographical variation in reporting
29,656 NEWS recordings were made across 46 Local Authority (LA) areas, from 480 unique care home IDs (identifiers for the device used to record the measurement, representing a care home, or a distinct unit within a care home). Most recordings were made in two LAs in the north east of England (n=11,029 and n=10,347), and in one London borough (n=3,411).
Deaths in care homes
There were 10,407 registered deaths in care homes in the 46 LA and CCG areas between 29/12/2019 and 10/05/2020. The first death from COVID-19 was registered in week commencing 23/03/2020. From 23/03/2020 to 10/05/2020, there were 5,753 deaths of care home residents - 1,532 with an underlying cause of COVID-19 and 4,221 due to causes excluding COVID-19.
Baseline NEWS centile scores
Table 1 contains information on NEWS taken from 9,586 (70% subset of 13,694) recordings made before 01/03/2020. Table 1 also contains thresholds for NEWS 20th centile scores, and 80th and 20th centile scores for NEWS components calculated in this subset, and the proportion of observations exceeding these values in the 30% validation dataset.
NEWS measurements and care home deaths
The proportion of above baseline NEWS observations was stable from week 1 (30/12/2019 – 05/01/ 2020) until week 12 (16/03/2020-22/03/2020) and week 13 (23/03/2020- 29/03/2020) when there was a marked increase. This increase happened in the weeks before the majority of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 deaths began to occur (from week 15 (06/04 – 12/04). The proportion of above baseline NEWS scores peaked in week 15, before beginning to decline again from week 16 (13/04-19/04) onwards (figure 1). The highest correlation was observed for a two-week lag (r=0.82, p< 0.05, supplemental figure 1)
Individual NEWS component measures and care home deaths
The proportion of above baseline measures of high respiratory rate (r=0.73, p< 0.05 for a two-week lag) and low oxygen saturation (r=0.80, p< 0.05 for a two-week lag) appear to follow the pattern of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 deaths more closely than other component measures (supplemental figure 1). The proportion of above baseline measures of temperature appeared to be decreasing between week 0 and week 10, before rising slightly to plateau until week 15 before declining again.
Discussion
This study suggests that NEWS could make a useful contribution to disease surveillance in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. A rise in the proportion of above-baseline NEWS was observed from the middle of March 2020, when the incidence of COVID-19 was believed to be rising in the UK. The proportion of above-baseline measurements of oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and temperature also increased approximately two weeks before peaks in care home deaths in corresponding geographical areas. Oxygen saturation and respiratory rate appear to signal rise in mortality almost as well as total NEWS and may be safer and more practical to measure during a pandemic.
In this study, we observed a two-week time lag between peaks in NEWS measures and deaths. This is similar to the observed time between symptom onset and COVID-19 death in other settings.13, 14 Evidence for the role of NEWS in acute illness in community settings is growing,15,16,17,18,19 but to date, only one descriptive study has provided empirical data on NEWS in care homes.6 A recent systematic review on the use of NEWS in assessing unwell COVID-19 patients in primary care suggested that enthusiasm for its use may be premature.9 Our study does not provide support for the contribution of NEWS measurement to the care of individual residents, but it does suggest that it may have a role in health surveillance at a population level. Measurement and monitoring of some NEWS components may be useful in detecting future waves of COVID-19 infection in care homes. Emerging evidence suggests that up to half of care home residents do not have symptoms at the time they test positive for COVID-19.20 Whether NEWS measurement would detect approaching illness in any of these residents is unknown, and it cannot substitute for a comprehensive programme of testing in care homes.
Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine longitudinal variation in NEWS in care homes. We have described trends over time using a specific software system to collect data on NEWS in care homes. This means that the distribution of care homes within and between areas is not systematic, as it reflects the market share of the software company and local support for digital data collection in care homes. Most recordings were drawn from the north east of England, and a London borough, but we have no information on the proportion of care home residents in each area that are represented in our dataset. All the data were anonymised, and without individual outcome data, we examined patterns in and simple correlations between NEWS and area-level weekly registered death information. This study design was a pragmatic approach that made best use of available data, but it is not a causal study, nor a study of diagnostic accuracy, and it is liable to the ecological fallacy.
Conclusions
NEWS may be useful to monitor health in care homes during the pandemic, but use of a shortened NEWS could be recommended. Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and temperature provide a similar signal to the complete NEWS. The omission of some components of NEWS, such as blood pressure, minimises contact time between residents and care home staff, potentially reducing infection risk. Data on mortality and diagnoses, linked to NEWS, is required to evaluate the role of NEWS in assessing individual residents with suspected COVID-19 infection. Collection and aggregation of data from care homes would facilitate disease surveillance; we argue that introduction of a care home minimum dataset should be a priority for the UK.
Data Availability
Data sharing: Information on the deaths of care home residents is feely available from the source cited.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by a University Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 3297/2020) and was conducted under the Secretary of State’s directions under the Control of Patient Information Regulations, following advice from the Health Research Authority.
Funding
This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Role of the funder
The study funder, played no part in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Supplemental information
Footnotes
Daniel.Stow{at}newcastle.ac.uk
Robert.Barker{at}newcastle.ac.uk
Fiona.Matthews{at}newcastle.ac.uk
Barbara.Hanratty{at}newcastle.ac.uk