Abstract
The past eight months witnessed COVID-19’s fast-spreading at the global level. Limited by medical resources shortage and uneven facilities distribution, online help-seeking becomes an essential approach to cope with public health emergencies for many ordinaries. This study explored the driving forces behind the retransmission of online help-seeking posts. We built an analytical framework that emphasized content characteristics, including information completeness, proximity, support seeking type, disease severity, and emotion. Adopting the framework, a quantitative content analysis was conducted with a probability sample of 727 posts. The results illustrate the importance of individual information completeness, high proximity, instrumental support seeking. This study also reveals the severity principle and the power of anger in the dissemination of help-seeking messages. As one of the first online help-seeking diffusion analyses in the COVID-19 period, the theoretical and practical implications of this study are further discussed.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), COVID-19 has resulted in more than 6 million confirmed cases and nearly 0.4 million deaths worldwide by June 1st, 2020. Due to the destructive power and highly infectious feature of this new coronavirus, many countries have taken various kinds of measures to prevent virus transmission. Meanwhile, people use social media to acquire and exchange multiple types of information at a historic and unprecedented scale (Li et al., 2020a). So far, some researches have concentrated on the effects of social media in this particular period. For example, harness the social media posts to predict infected case counts and inform timely responses under the infoveillance or infodemiology framework (Li, Xu, Cuomo, Purushothaman, & Mackey, 2020b; Shen, Chen, Luo, Zhang, Feng, & Liao, 2020); analyze the help-seeking posts to identify the characteristics of COVID-19 patients (Huang, et al., 2020); discuss the online censorship on social media from the risk communication perspective (Fu & Zhu, 2020). Among all the research, online help-seeking, as a practical approach to handle difficulties during public health emergencies, has a unique research significance. Firstly, when facing scarce medical resources during the initial outbreak stage, many suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients were failing to be admitted to a hospital, many of them turned to social media fork help (e.g., sickbeds, testing kits, emotional comforts) and share information instantly (Huang et al., 2020). Secondly, online help-seeking helps relevant actors to ease anxiety, build mutual aid networks, and make the most of the collective power to cope with risks (Mukkamala & Beck, 2018; Barros, Duggan, & Rebholz-Schuhmann, 2020). Social support or so-called supportive communication in computer-mediated communication contexts has always been a hotly discussed issue (Rains, Peterson, & Wright, 2015). COVID-19, as an epidemic affecting the whole world, provides a valuable chance to explore the mechanisms and effects of online help-seeking. Its practical and theoretical implications not only offer an insight into understanding help-seeking and promote problem-solving during a public health crisis but also enrich the strategies on how to develop compelling online help-seeking posts.
This study aims to explore help-seeking information diffusion on Chinese social media. As Wang et al. (2019) suggest, probing into information diffusion is the basis for understanding and managing the dynamics of content on social media. Generally speaking, retweeting help-seeking posts can be interpreted as a kind of prosocial behavior, which means retweeters intended to help others or the society as a whole by joining the retransmission process (Dovidio, 1984; Lee, Kim, & Kim, 2015). In fact, previous studies provided limited insights on evaluating help-seeking information diffusion during health emergencies. Many studies followed the “sender-content” framework (see Liu, Liu, & Li, 2012) but failed to develop a comprehensive content measurement for health crisis communication. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first online help-seeking diffusion analysis during the COVID-19 period. We intended to replenish content measurement to conform to the current situation. Our findings will provide a reference for social media help-seeking in a similar period in the future.
Literature Review
Retransmission of help-seeking posts and content characteristics
With the rapid development of social media, new possibilities of seeking help online have kept emerging. More and more people are turning to cyberspace for specific social support seeking in various domains like coping with daily hassles, battling a life-threatening illness (Pan, Feng, & Wingate, 2018). Social network sites like Twitter (Rui, Chen, & Damiano, 2013), Facebook (Indian & Grieve, 2014), Instagram (Andalibi, Ozturk & Forte, 2017) or online forums (Braithwaite, Waldron, & Finn, 1999; Coursaris & Liu, 2009; Pan, Shen, & Feng, 2017) increase the opportunities of receiving and providing social support from all sides. Retransmission, or the so-called retweeting, has always been seen as a crucial indicator of information diffusion in social media platforms (Yang, Tufts, Ungar, Guntuku, & Merchant, 2018). Some studies treated retransmission as a judgment of the effectiveness of communication (Liu, Lu, & Wang, 2017; Wang et al., 2019). The retweeting behavior has been demonstrated as a conversational practice on social media platform (boyd, Golder, & Lotan, 2010); a way to seek personal benefits from the social network (Recuero, Araujo, & Zago, 2011); a kind of prosocial behavior aims to offer help or provide advice to others driven by altruistic and reciprocity motivations (Lee et al., 2015). Retransmission is critical in online help-seeking, especially in the epidemic context for two reasons. Firstly, retweeting is a typical one-to-many communication describing the degree of viral reach on social media (Liu et al., 2017). More retransmission means more users receiving the message, thus increasing the chance of getting help. Secondly, from a practical point of view, facing the medical resources shortage and uneven distribution of medical facilities, widely disseminated help-seeking posts played the role of social warning, assisted official institutions in understanding urgent affairs as well as allocating supplies more effectively.
What are the driving factors behind online help-seeking messages retransmission? Most existing studies categorized driving forces into two dimensions: the sender factors and the content factors (Briones, Nan, Madden, & Waks, 2012; Yang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). However, significant driving forces are varied by context. In this study, ordinary people use social media to seek help during a crisis time, which means senders’ identities are very close. Thus, it would be more reasonable and significant to explore further in the content factor. There is plenty of research providing conceptual references, such as the depth of self-disclosure (Altman & Taylor, 1973; Pan et al., 2018), different types of support messages (Pan et al., 2018; Wingate, Feng, Kim, Pan, & Jiang, 2020), physical and emotional proximity to the target (Huang, Starbird, Orand, Stanek, & Pedersen, 2015), the social capital stock of the help seeker (Pan, Shen, & Feng, 2017). Enlightened by existing experience, we will summarize the impelling factors of help-seeking information diffusion into five dimensions: completeness, proximity, support typology, disease severity, emotion, and elaborate them in the following sections.
Completeness
Completeness is bound up with credibility. Credibility has always been seen as perceived quality and as a result of intertwined dimensions (Fogg & Tseng, 1999; Fogg et al., 2000). Previous studies usually concentrated on source credibility and stressed the significant influence of source credibility perception on retweeting behavior in sports news (Boehmer & Tandoc, 2015) and health information diffusion (Lee & Sundar, 2013), the importance of content credibility was overlooked to some extent. In brief, content with high credibility should be internally consistent and clearly presented. Many scholars have elucidated the connotation of content credibility, including complete, in-depth, precise, reliable, accurate, unbiased, objective, factual, and fair (Sundar, 1999; Bucy, 2003; Hilligoss & Rieh, 2008). In a systematic literature review, Sbaffi and Rowley (2017) listed dozens of content features influencing trust judgments and credibility perception, which means credibility is a typical compound concept made up of various subdimensions (Self, 1996). As a result, it is impossible to investigate all elements of credibility in one study. The proper approach is to pick out the critical factor based on the specific research context.
Completeness is a pivotal part of content credibility, especially in online help-seeking during COVID-19. As the name suggests, it means how much information does an individual disclose and the clarity of the provided information (Stvilia, Mon, & Yi, 2009). Completeness contributes to the perception of health information quality on the Internet (Bates, Romina, Ahmed, & Hopson, 2006). Firstly, more complete information means more additional information, which increases the “real world feel” (Freeman & Spyridakis, 2004). More detailed information implies more communication cues, improves the social presence of communicators in nonverbally environments (Li, Feng, Li, & Tan, 2015). Secondly, completeness is directly bound up with the amount and depth of self-disclosure. Altman and Taylor (1973) argued that breadth is the amount of disclosed information, while depth is the intimacy of disclosed information. A complete self-disclosure can effectively convey individuals’ needs and reveal who they are, also benefits the likelihood of receiving social support (Huang, 2016). In this study, we extrapolate that online help seekers’ willingness to divulge their personal information helps the audience comprehend their identities. Besides, a complete expression of disease development or health condition usually demonstrates the seriousness of the current problem, improves credibility perception, and eventually leads to successful support provision. We propose the following:
H1: Completeness of individual information in online help-seeking posts is positively associated with retransmission.
H2: Completeness of disease status in online help-seeking posts is positively associated with retransmission.
Proximity
The construal level theory (CLT) proposed that people live in a variety of intangible “distances,” such as spatial-temporal distance, social distance, psychological distance, and so on (Trope & Liberman, 2010; Kwon, Chadha, & Pellizzaro, 2017). With the extension of distance, people’s cognition (that is, the level of interpretation) of related events and characters becomes more abstract and general, which means a high level of interpretation. On the contrary, people tend to have a more specific and concrete conception of things at a close range, namely the low level of interpretation (Fiedler, Semin, Finkenauer, & Berkel, 1995; Trope & Liberman, 2003; Wang et al., 2019; Trope & Liberman, 2010). This kind of “distance” was interpreted as proximity by many researchers (Trope & Liberman, 2010; Kwon et al., 2017), consists of social proximity, geographical proximity, etc.
The impacts of proximity are reflected in two aspects. On the one hand, proximity plays an irreplaceable role in affecting an individual’s empathy and compassion toward others’ misfortune. Generally speaking, high proximity increases empathy towards the victims, while low proximity weakens it (Lenstein & Small, 2007). Numerous studies highlighted the role of psychological distance in eliciting empathy towards intimates (e.g., immediate family members) or strangers, indicating that sympathy and compassion for others are highly associated with psychological proximity (Barnett, Tetreault, Esper, & Bristow, 1986; Batson, Lishner, Cook, & Sawyer, 2005; Loewenstein & Small, 2007). On the other hand, proximity also affects individual’s information processing, such as perceived information trustworthiness (Lee & Sundar, 2013; Shen et al., 2020), information interpretation (Nan, 2007), moral judgment (Žeželj & Jokić, 2014), moral evaluation (Agerström, Björklund, & Carlsson, 2013), and information sharing (Huang, Starbird, Orand, Stanek, & Pedersen, 2015). Specifically, a study led by Lee and Sundar (2013) argued that proximal source boosts perceived content credibility significantly than the distal source, which in turn promotes information sharing (Ha & Ahn, 2011), even information adoption (Rabjohn, Cheung, & Lee, 2008). Huang et al. (2015) also proved the evident influences of physical and emotional proximity on online information seeking and sharing under the crisis context.
Based on the above rationale, in supportive communication context, empathy and compassion are closely related to proximity, which further affects information diffusion. Likewise, some studies noted that reciprocal social support behaviors frequently occur in close social proximity circumstances (Rabjohn et al., 1988) and a higher social presence environment, which represents psychological proximity (Li et al., 2015). Thus, we propose the following hypothesis:
H3: A high proximity between the online help seeker and the target patient triggers more retransmission than low proximity.
Support typology
People give support to others in multiple ways, while how different types of social support are associated with the seeking-provision remains underexplored. A considerable number of studies summarized distinct social support types and put forward some conceptual frameworks (House, 1981; Malecki & Demaray, 2003). Some scholars conceptually divided social support into four categories, including emotional support (e.g., expression of empathy, love, trust, and caring), informational support (e.g., advice-giving, providing suggestions, sharing information), appraisal support (i.e., offering information for self-evaluation), and instrumental support (i.e., providing tangible support) (House, 1981; Malecki & Demaray, 2003; Muñoz-Laboy, Severson, Perry, & Guilamo-Ramos, 2014). Others extended the categories of social support by incorporating emotion, esteem, information, network, and tangible assistance (Cutrona & Suhr, 1992; Coulson, 2005; Coulson, Buchanan, & Aubeeluck, 2007). Moreover, the social support inventory of UCLA (the University of California at Los Angeles) proposes a classification framework consists of three types: information or advice, tangible assistance or aid, and emotional support (Dunkel-Schetter, Feinstein, & Call, 1986).
For concision and clear, also following the previous operation (Wilson et al., 1999; Shakespeare-Finch & Obst, 2011; Federici & Skaalvik, 2014), we merged the existing frameworks into two major types: emotional support and instrumental support. The former one typically refers to needs regarding caring, empathy, love, and trust (Wilson et al., 1999; Ko, Wang, & Xu, 2013; Federici & Skaalvik, 2014), while the latter one denotes the requirements of instrumental resources and practical help (Wilson et al., 1999; Malecki & Demaray, 2003). The interplay between social support types and support provision is still under-investigated, particularly the comparison of different types’ outcomes has not been thoroughly examined in the online context. This study intends to remedy the defects by discussing how distinct types of social support induce different feedbacks. Therefore, we raise a research question:
RQ1: What is the relationship between support seeking types and retransmission?
Disease severity
A patient’s demands vary by the disease phase because each phase presents a new set of challenges and concomitant opportunities (Luker, Beaver, Leinster, & Owens, 1996; van der Molen, 2000). COVID-19 is a relatively novel virus with severe clinical manifestation, and it even incurs death (Emanuel et al., 2020). However, bounded by the shortage of testing capacity in COVID-19’s early stage, not all infected patients can get diagnosed formally on time (Shen et al., 2020). As a result, suspected cases and confirmed cases were treated differently, receiving different medical services. Before the establishment of makeshift hospitals, patients who have mild symptoms but not laboratory-confirmed often isolated themselves at home, while those who got confirmed were admitted to hospitals in a relatively short time. Thus it is reasonable to infer that help seekers in different disease phases would get dissimilar attention. And normally, the more serious the illness, the more urgent the help-seeking and the more likely to obtain support provision. Accordingly, we posit:
H4: Disease severity expressed in online help-seeking posts is positively associated with retransmission.
Emotion
Because different emotions usually have different effects on information processing and stimulate different behaviors, exploring emotional expression in online support seeking posts is vital to understand supportive communication in virtual spaces. Previous researchers suggested that fear is the most prominent emotion during the pandemic times, which is highly contagious and makes people feel imminent threats easily (Cole, Balcetis, & Dunning, 2012). In comparison, other types of illnesses often associated with a plethora of emotional types range from hope to fear and humor to sadness (Mukherjee, 2010). Lazarus (1991) and Dillard et al. (2001) summarized several primary discrete emotions in the health communication field, along with their signal values, functions, action tendencies, and valences (Shown in Table 1). As a matter of fact, hope and happiness rarely exist in our research corpus. Consequently, this study selects fear, anger, sadness as three main emotional types, explores the relationship between emotions and retransmission.
Psychological properties of discrete emotions in health communication field
One study found that anxiety positively predicted health information seeking, with regard to emotional support seeking, fear and anxiety are two positive stimuli, while shame acts as a negative stimulus (Lee, Hwang, Hawkins, & Pingree, 2008). But it is still not clear how distinct emotional types induce different retweeting effects. Therefore, we formulate the following research question:
RQ2: What is the relationship between emotional types and retransmission?
Method
Data
We choose China as our research field for the following reasons. Firstly, Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province, is the earliest epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak (Wu, Leung, & Leung, 2020). However, the Chinese government adopted a series of prevention and control measures to bring the virus under control, almost tamed the spread of COVID-19 in mainland China (China Daily, 2020). China’s experience can be an essential reference to other countries, especially in current global pandemic time. Secondly, with the rapid development of Internet facilities in China, Internet penetration has reached 61.2% in China until June 2019, along with a continuous growing scale of social media users (China Internet Network Information Center, 2019). Some social media platforms play the role of organizing campaigns, promoting the formation of civil society and the public sphere in China (Lu & Qiu, 2013). In today’s crisis period, Chinese social media exerts the potential to mobilize collective intelligence to overcome difficulties, inspiring other countries to utilize social media to solve health-related problems and cross tough barriers.
Sina Weibo, one of the most popular social media platforms in China, was selected as the sample pool. According to Weibo’s user report in 2018, this social media service has accumulated more than 0.4 billion monthly active users and nearly 0.2 billion daily active users until Q4 of 2018 (Sina Weibo Data Center, 2019). Weibo has been proved as a vibrant discussion platform and help-seeking space during major social events, especially in the COVID-19 period (Huang et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2020). All authors went through relevant help-seeking posts on Weibo and picked up pertinent keywords. After screening and merging, three pairs of keyword combinations were determined as search terms, including “pneumonia + ask for help,” “pneumonia + seek help,” and “pneumonia + help me.” Date range starts from Jan. 20th, 2020, which is the date that Nanshan Zhong1 confirmed human-to-human transmission (Wang & Qu, 2020), and ends at Mar. 1st, 2020, as the closing date of the first Fang Cang makeshift hospital in the epicenter Wuhan City, indicating the epidemic had been roughly under control in China (Xu, 2020).
A web crawler written in Python programming language was applied to retrieve all qualified posts. 34,088 posts were collected in the first round, and 9,826 posted remained after removing duplicated and unqualified posts. Because of the large amount of data, 727 posts were sampled randomly from the whole corpus for further analysis. Every single post acts as the analysis unit for our study, and each post contains the user ID, post time, retweet number, content, and some other necessary attributes.
Measurement
The measurement scheme was built on the literature review. Emotion type is composed of fear, anger, sadness, and others. Support typology contains emotional support seeking, instrumental support seeking, and no specific kind of support seeking. Proximity was operationalized into reporting self-illness, reporting others’ illness, and both. Disease severity consists of three kinds: suspected case, confirmed case, and others. Completeness is further decomposed into the completeness of individual information and disease status. Detailed meanings of those categories are listed in Table 2. Number of followers, posting frequency and some other indicators are incorporated into analysis as control variables according to existing research (Liu et al., 2012; Zhang, Peng, Zhang, Wang, & Zhu, 2014).
Concepts and corresponding variables
Coding
A pilot study with 100 posts was conducted to test the coding scheme and train the coders. The pilot study validated the effectiveness of the proposed coding scheme and the accuracy of the corresponding classifications. Three coders major in communication studies were recruited to code the posts for inter-coder reliability evaluation. The average Krippendorff’s alpha coefficient was 0.753 in the first round, which is slightly below the acceptable level. We then retrained the coders, resolved all discrepancies, and sampled another 114 posts from the corpus randomly for a new round trial coding. The average reliability coefficient was 0.873 in the second round, which means highly consistent among the coders. All coders then performed coding work on the remaining posts independently.
Analysis
Since the dependent variable is the number of retweets, traditional linear regression models are inadequate for modeling this kind of highly skewed count variable. Four count models: Poisson regression, negative binomial regression, zero-inflated Poisson regression, and zero-inflated negative binomial regression were compared to fit the data. Firstly, the conditional variance of the outcome variable far exceeds the conditional mean on most categorical explanatory variables, which violates the underlying assumption of Poisson regression. Secondly, we compared the negative binomial regression with the zero-inflated negative binomial regression. Figure 1 displays the residuals from the two tested models, and small residual distribution indicates the good-fitting of the corresponding model.
Model comparison based on residuals
Note. Small residuals are indicative of good-fitting models, the model with line closest to zero should be considered for our research data.
Besides, the AIC and BIC indicators also approved the conclusion that the negative binomial regression model (AIC = 6.930, BIC = 424.217) is more preferred to the other one (AIC = 7.034, BIC = 445.066). Table 3 shows the descriptive statistical results of all variables.
Descriptive statistical results of all variables
Results
Figure 2 summarized the results of negative binomial regression models. Model A contains all control variables, while Model B contains both control variables and principal independent variables. All coefficients are evaluated based on robust standard errors.
Results of negative binomial regression models
Note. Coefficient of each variable and its 95% confidence interval are plotted, intervals not cross the vertical zero line denote statistically significant variables
With regard to the completeness, for each one-unit increase in disclosing individual information, the expected log count of the number of retweets increased by 0.588 (p < .001, IRR2 = 1.800).
However, the correlation between completeness of disease status and the number of retweets is insignificant. Thus, H1 was supported but H2 was rejected.
When it comes to proximity, reporting self-illness (B = 2.408, p < .01, IRR = 11.116) and both self and others’ illnesses (B = 3.037, p < .001, IRR = 20.840) are expected to receive more retweets than only reporting others’ illnesses. H3 was supported.
For support seeking type, the expected log retweet count of instrumental support seeking is significantly more than emotional support seeking (B = 1.929, p < .001, IRR = 6.885), but no specific support seeking is statistically insignificant. RQ1 was answered.
H4 discusses the relationship between disease severity and retransmission. Compared with other illness stages, posts about confirmed cases receive more attention (B = 2.079, p < .001, IRR = 7.997), suspected cases afterwards (B = 2.053, p < .001, IRR = 7.792). H4 was supported.
RQ2 asks how emotional types affect help-seeking diffusion. The expected log retweet count for fear is lower than the expected log count for anger (B = −1.911, p < .01, IRR = 0.148), followed by others (B = −2.053, p < .01, IRR = 0.128) and sadness (B = −2.343, p < .001, IRR = 0.096).
Borrowing former scholars’ experience (Wang et al., 2019), we further conducted a sensitivity test using the MANOVA analysis for cross-validation. The robustness check results (both coefficient size and significance) are close to the negative binomial regression, proving the accuracy of our estimation.
Discussion
First of all, the findings of the completeness part are in concert with one recent research. Pan et al. (2020) found that support-seeking posts with peripheral self-disclosure elicit lower perceived anonymity in the support-provider side, thus increasing the trustworthiness of the support-seeking messages and improving the quality of advice. Peripheral self-disclosure denotes biographical data, including name, age, gender, geographical information (Pan et al., 2020), which is precisely the “completeness of individual information” defined in our study. From the perspective of uncertainty reduction theory, message without clear source identity is more likely to be perceived as low credibility, further impeding support-providers’ engagement in supportive communication (Berger, 1987; Rains, 2007). In other words, detailed personal information disclosure can effectively diminish perceived anonymity and demonstrate the vulnerability of help-seekers, which is pivotal in text-based online anonymous settings.
On the contrary, the completeness of disease status fails to trigger retweet behavior. One possible explanation could be the high threshold of medical knowledge posed a high demand for laypersons, resulting in an invisible “communication gap” (Filho et al., 2020). The diagnostic report, lung X-ray photo, or medical record requires expertise to understand, which seems impossible to most Weibo users. However, this does not mean that the description of the disease is not important. To improve the communication effect, symptoms and development of the illness should be described in detail through simple words to make it easily understood by ordinary people. This rule could be verified by the positive correlation between the text length and the retransmission (Liu, Shi, Chen, Wu, & Qi, 2014).
The impact of proximity on information transmission is consistent with the previous studies (Huang, Starbird, Orand, Stanek, & Pedersen, 2015; Lee and Sundar, 2013), which demonstrates that a high level of proximity triggers more retransmission. Proximity was operationalized into reporting self-illness, reporting others’ illness, and both in our study. On the one hand, proximity can be interpreted as a type of constructed imaginary relationship with “others,” or a perceived connection between individuals (Lenstein & Small, 2007). Imaginary relationship plays a vital role in eliciting emotional or informational responses to suffering. Reporting self-illness, reporting others’ illness, and reporting both represent different levels of perceived psychological distance, lead to varying amounts of information retransmission. On the other hand, the rhetoric school emphasizes the effect of “narrative distance” on audiences’ emotional involvement (Andringa, 1996). Specifically, narrative perspectives (first-person versus third-person) can influence victim blame and supporting intention by affecting the perceived psychological distance (Cao & Decker, 2015). Follow this thread, reporting self-illness and reporting others’ illness can be separately associated with first-person and third-person narrative perspectives, stimulating disparate psychological distances and leads to different responses toward the patients eventually.
Although social network services generally offer substantial opportunities for social support transactions, their potential to provide emotional and instrumental support may differ (Trepte, Dienlin, & Reinecke, 2015). In this study, more than half of posts contain instrumental support seeking intention, far exceed emotional support seeking, and no specific kind of support seeking. Instrumental support seeking posts receive more retransmission. This result suggests that in the health communication field, especially during a severe pandemic, it is inevitable to face the explosive growth of information. Under this circumstance, attention becomes a scarce but valuable resource (World Health Organization, 2018). Compared with nihilistic emotional support seeking, instrumental support seeking focused on improving one’s health condition, demonstrating direct material needs, and showing the willingness for immediate help. Besides, based on Vitak and Ellison’s work (2013), many people are reluctant to express emotional needs online because they do not want to appear “needy.” Emotional support also articulates with intimacy, which is a prerequisite for emotional communication between interactive partners (Stokers, 1983). The anonymity feature of online communication hinders help seekers’ desire for emotional support, impedes the occurrence of in-depth emotional communication (Newman, Lauterbach, Munson, Resnick, & Morris, 2011).
Regarding severity, extant studies revealed that giving priority to the worst-case when allocating health resources in a pandemic is a fundamental principle (Emanuel & Wertheimer, 2006; Persad, Wertheimer, & Emanuel, 2009; Rosenbaum et al., 2011; Biddison et al., 2014; Zucker et al., 2015). This study proves that how to treat patients is in accordance with this principle. The severity of illness positively correlates with retransmission. One reason is that confirmed patients need timely medical care than other patients. Senses of urgency and scarce medical resources drive other social media users to participate in the retweeting process to help confirmed cases find adequate medicare in time.
When it comes to emotion, posts expressing anger received more retransmission than fear, sadness, and other kinds of emotions. Based on our observation, anger mostly stems from hospitals’ unfair treatment or official institutions’ delayed responses. It is reasonable for social media users to stand on the “just side” to support the unfortunate patients. By retweeting the angry posts, retweeters vented their feelings, intended to get more attention, and urged relevant departments to take effective measures. In our research corpus, sadness is the second common emotion. However, it received the least retransmission. This can be attributed to sadness’s intrinsic characteristics: posts with sadness mainly express disappointment toward reality but resist to advocate practical attempts to change reality. This finding implies that when seeking help online, one should stress the principal problem and avoid simple catharsis. Similarly, ingeniously using prevailing emotion contributes to receiving sympathy and pragmatic feedback from others.
Conclusion
COVID-19 poses enormous threats to the whole world. Due to the unbalanced distribution of medical resources and inadequate response at the early breakout stage, many patients (both suspected and confirmed), along with their relatives or friends, turned to social media for support seeking. This study explores the driving forces behind online help-seeking post transmission in a global pandemic period by emphasizing the content characteristics. Completeness, proximity, support typology, disease severity, and emotion composed the analytical framework. By employing content analysis, 727 randomly sampled help-seeking posts were analyzed based on a coding scheme derived from the literature review. Negative binomial regression reveals that posts release anger, express instrumental support seeking intention, report self-illness, expound confirmed cases’ conditions, and have detailed individual information disclosure are likely to have more retransmission.
Coronavirus is still spreading fast around the world. As one of the first countries to restrain the spread of the epidemic, China provides a significant experience to other countries stuck in a dilemma. As the first online help-seeking analysis research in the COVID-19 period, this study offers some insights about health communication via social media, especially how to develop a potent help-seeking post in public health emergencies. However, a couple of limitations need to be mentioned. First, retransmission of post, as the core dependent variable in our study, is a multidimensional concept. For example, Wang et al. (2019) decomposed retransmission into “scale” and “structural virality.” Limited by research resources and time, we failed to elucidate information diffusion comprehensively. Second, although China’s experience is representative, whether this pattern can be generalized into other contexts worth carefully examining. Future studies should conduct more explorations on other social media platforms (e.g., Twitter) to verify the reliability and validity of our results and summarize effective online help-seeking strategies in diversified environments.
Notes
Nanshan Zhong is a well-known Chinese pulmonologist, he was one of the leading experts in managing COVID-19 in China.
IRR is the abbreviation of Incident Rate Ratios, which means the conditional incidence rate compared with baselines.
Data Availability
All online help-seeking posts related to COVID-19 were retrieved from the Sina Weibo platform, we listed our search terms and date range in the manuscript. All researchers can obtain the same corpus by using the search function of Sina Weibo.
References
