Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

More than privacy: Australians’ concerns and misconceptions about the COVIDSafe App

View ORCID ProfileRae Thomas, View ORCID ProfileZoe A Michaleff, Hannah Greenwood, Eman Abukmail, View ORCID ProfilePaul Glasziou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.09.20126110
Rae Thomas
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rae Thomas
  • For correspondence: rthomas@bond.edu.au
Zoe A Michaleff
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zoe A Michaleff
Hannah Greenwood
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eman Abukmail
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Glasziou
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Glasziou
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Timely and effective contact tracing is an essential public health role to curb the transmission of COVID-19. App-based contact tracing has the potential to optimise the resources of overstretched public health departments. However, it’s efficiency is dependent on wide-spread adoption. We aimed to identify the proportion of people who had downloaded the Australian Government COVIDSafe app and examine the reasons why some did not.

Method An online national survey with representative quotas for age and gender was conducted between May 8 and May 11 2020. Participants were excluded if they were a healthcare professional or had been tested for COVID-19.

Results Of the 1802 potential participants contacted, 289 were excluded, 13 declined, and 1500 participated in the survey (response rate 83%). Of survey participants, 37% had downloaded the COVIDSafe app, 19% intended to, 28% refused, and 16% were undecided. Equally proportioned reasons for not downloading the app included privacy (25%) and technical concerns (24%). Other reasons included a belief that social distancing was sufficient and the app is unnecessary (16%), distrust in the Government (11%), and apathy (11%). In addition, COVIDSafe knowledge varied with confusion about its purpose and capabilities.

Conclusion For the COVIDSafe app to be accepted by the public and used correctly, public health messages need to address the concerns of its citizens, specifically in regards to privacy, data storage, and technical capabilities. Understanding the specific barriers preventing the uptake of tracing apps provides the opportunity to design targeted communication strategies aimed at strengthening public health initiatives such as download and correct use.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Rae Thomas, Zoe Michaleff, and Hannah Greenwood are supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Program grant (#1106452). Paul Glasziou is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship (#1080042).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee (#RT03008).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data may be available upon request from authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
More than privacy: Australians’ concerns and misconceptions about the COVIDSafe App
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
More than privacy: Australians’ concerns and misconceptions about the COVIDSafe App
Rae Thomas, Zoe A Michaleff, Hannah Greenwood, Eman Abukmail, Paul Glasziou
medRxiv 2020.06.09.20126110; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.09.20126110
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
More than privacy: Australians’ concerns and misconceptions about the COVIDSafe App
Rae Thomas, Zoe A Michaleff, Hannah Greenwood, Eman Abukmail, Paul Glasziou
medRxiv 2020.06.09.20126110; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.09.20126110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (552)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1752)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (657)
  • Epidemiology (10792)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (586)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2939)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1921)
  • Health Policy (835)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (744)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (628)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12510)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (687)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2791)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (432)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (557)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1460)
  • Ophthalmology (443)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (363)
  • Primary Care Research (336)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2636)
  • Public and Global Health (5350)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1009)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)