Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

An Assessment of Bayesian Model-Averaged Logistic Regression for Intensive-Care Prognosis

View ORCID ProfileRichard Dybowski
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.20124412
Richard Dybowski
Medical Informatics Laboratory (Division of Medicine), King’s College London (St Thomas Hospital Campus), Lambeth Palace Road, London SE 7EH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard Dybowski
  • For correspondence: rd460@cam.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Logistic regression is the standard method for developing prognostic models for intensive care, but this approach does not take into account the uncertainty in the model selected and the uncertainty in its regression coefficients. This weakness can be addressed by adopting a Bayesian model-averaged approach to logistic regression; however, with respect to the dataset used for our study, we found maximum likelihood to be as effective as the more elaborate Bayesian approach, and an implementation of model averaging did not improve performance. Nevertheless, the Bayesian approach has the theoretical advantage that it can exploit prior knowledge about regression coefficient and model probabilities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received for the work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

St Thomas' Hospital Research Ethics Committee. Ethical approval was not required.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is from anonymised ICU patient data and is not available to the public.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 09, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Assessment of Bayesian Model-Averaged Logistic Regression for Intensive-Care Prognosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An Assessment of Bayesian Model-Averaged Logistic Regression for Intensive-Care Prognosis
Richard Dybowski
medRxiv 2020.06.08.20124412; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.20124412
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
An Assessment of Bayesian Model-Averaged Logistic Regression for Intensive-Care Prognosis
Richard Dybowski
medRxiv 2020.06.08.20124412; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.20124412

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1226)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (527)
  • Epidemiology (9992)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (496)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2433)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1633)
  • Health Policy (750)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (633)
  • Hematology (247)
  • HIV/AIDS (529)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11847)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (624)
  • Medical Education (251)
  • Medical Ethics (73)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2268)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (349)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (450)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1242)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (727)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (280)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2274)
  • Public and Global Health (4816)
  • Radiology and Imaging (833)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (486)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (224)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (123)
  • Urology (99)