Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Assessing the Impact of Imputation on the Interpretations of Prediction Models: A Case Study on Mortality Prediction for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri, Aiwen Xing, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu, View ORCID ProfileJiang Bian, View ORCID ProfileZhe He
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.20124347
Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aiwen Xing
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shaeke Salman
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiuwen Liu
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiang Bian
2University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jiang Bian
Zhe He
1Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zhe He
  • For correspondence: zhe@fsu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction poses significant health risks and financial burden on healthcare and families. Prediction of mortality risk among AMI patients using rich electronic health record (EHR) data can potentially save lives and healthcare costs. Nevertheless, EHR-based prediction models usually use a missing data imputation method without considering its impact on the performance and interpretability of the model, hampering its real-world applicability in the healthcare setting. This study examines the impact of different methods for imputing missing values in EHR data on both the performance and the interpretations of predictive models. Our results showed that a small standard deviation in root mean squared error across different runs of an imputation method does not necessarily imply a small standard deviation in the prediction models’ performance and interpretation. We also showed that the level of missingness and the imputation method used can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R21AG061431; and the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award number UL1TR001427. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB is not applicable due to the use of de-identified public dataset.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data are available upon request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 16, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the Impact of Imputation on the Interpretations of Prediction Models: A Case Study on Mortality Prediction for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing the Impact of Imputation on the Interpretations of Prediction Models: A Case Study on Mortality Prediction for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri, Aiwen Xing, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu, Jiang Bian, Zhe He
medRxiv 2020.06.06.20124347; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.20124347
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Assessing the Impact of Imputation on the Interpretations of Prediction Models: A Case Study on Mortality Prediction for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri, Aiwen Xing, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu, Jiang Bian, Zhe He
medRxiv 2020.06.06.20124347; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.20124347

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (450)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (82)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5248)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (755)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (696)
  • Health Policy (356)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5849)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (358)
  • Medical Education (103)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (762)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (130)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (476)
  • Ophthalmology (150)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (140)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (860)
  • Public and Global Health (2004)
  • Radiology and Imaging (348)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (73)
  • Sports Medicine (76)
  • Surgery (109)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)