The Role of Vitamin D in The Age of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Roya Ghasemian, Amir Shamshirian, Keyvan Heydari, Mohammad Malekan, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Hamed Jafarpour, Arash Rezaei Shahmirzadi, Mehrdad Khodabandeh, Benyamin Seyfari, Alireza Motamedzadeh, Ehsan Dadgostar, Marzieh Aalinezhad, Meghdad Sedaghat, Morteza Behnamfar, Anahita Asadi, Bahman Zarandi, Nazanin Razzaghi, Vahid Yaghoubi Naei, Amirhossein Hessami, Soheil Azizi, Ali Reza Mohseni, Danial Shamshirian
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.05.20123554

Abstract

Background Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID-19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to maximize the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19.

Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (intitle) as well as preprint database of medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square, preprints.org, and search engine of ScienceDirect up to October 10, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the systematic review.

Results Sixteen studies containing 4922 participants entered into the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that 48% of COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 29%-67%), and in 41% of patients, levels of vitamin D were insufficient (95% CI, 10%-82%). The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 18 ng/mL among all COVID-19 patients (95% CI, 13-24). Co-morbidities frequency in COVID-19 patients were as follows: 7.4% cancer, 27.1% chronic kidney disease, 30.4% cardiovascular diseases, 5.1% dementia, 14.5% depression/anxiety, 32.1% diabetes, 47.4% hypertension, 22.0% obesity and 17.5% respiratory diseases. Reported ethnic groups in studies were 1.0% Afro-Caribbean, 10.3% Asian, and 92.1% Caucasian.

Conclusion This study found that the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was low in all COVID-19 patients, and most of them were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. The Caucasian was the dominant ethnic group, and the most frequent co-morbidities in COVID-19 patients were hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, obesity, and respiratory diseases, which might be affected by vitamin D deficiency directly or indirectly.

Introduction

Following the emergence of a novel coronavirus from Wuhan, China, in December 2019, the respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has affected the whole world and is declared a pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) on March 26, 2020(1). According to Worldometer metrics, this novel virus has been responsible for approximately 37,754,464 infections, of which 28,361,239 cases are recovered, and 1,081,500 patients have died worldwide up to October 12, 2020.

After months of medical communities’ efforts, there is still no specific prevention and treatment approach against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Also, a competition of pandemic with infodemic has led to many controversies and challenges globally. In this regard, one of the hottest topics these days is the role of Vitamin D in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Several functions, such as modulating the adaptive immune system and cell-mediated immunity, as well as an increase of antioxidative-related genes expression, have been proven for Vitamin D as an adjuvant in the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory infections (2, 3). According to available investigations, it seems that such functions lead to cytokine storm suppression and avoid Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), which has been studied on other pandemics and infectious diseases in recent years (4-6).

To the best of our knowledge, unfortunately, after several months, there is no adequate high-quality data on different treatment regimens, which raises questions about gaps in scientific works. On this occasion, when there is an essential need for controlled randomized trials, it is surprising to see only observational studies without a control group or non-randomized controlled studies with retrospective nature covering a small number of patients. The same issue is debatable for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); hence, concerning all of the limitations and analyze difficulties, we carried out a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis to try for maximizing the use of everything that exists about the role of this vitamin in the COVID-19.

Methods

Search Strategy

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was considered for the study plan. A systematic search through databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (intitle), as well as preprint database of medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square, preprints.org, and search engine of ScienceDirect, was done up to October 10, 2020. Moreover, to obtain more data, we considered gray literature and references of eligible papers. The search strategy included all MeSH terms and free keywords found for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and Vitamin D. There was no time/location/ language limitation in this search.

Criteria study selection

Four researchers have screened and selected the papers independently, and the supervisor solved the disagreements. Studies met the following criteria included in the meta-analysis: 1) comparative or non-comparative studies with retrospective or prospective nature; and 2) studies reported the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Studies were excluded if they were: 1) in vitro studies, experimental studies, reviews, 2) duplicate publications.

Data extraction & quality assessment

Two researchers (H.J and M.M) have evaluated the papers’ quality assessment and extracted data from selected papers. The supervisor (D.Sh) resolved any disagreements in this step. The data extraction checklist included the name of the first author, publication year, region of study, number of patients, co-morbidity, vitamin D Status, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, ethnicity, mean age, medication dosage, treatment duration, adverse effects, radiological results, and mortality. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist for cross-sectional studies was used to value the studies concerning various aspects of the methodology and study process.

Hypothetical strategy

In this case, according to most of the studies, vitamin D cut-off points were considered as follows:

  • Vitamin D sufficiency: 25(OH)D concentration greater than 30 ng/mL

  • Vitamin D insufficiency: 25(OH)D concentration of 20 to 30 ng/mL

  • Vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D level less than 20 ng/mL

Targeted outcomes

1) Frequency of Vitamin D status in COVID-19 patients; 2) Mean 25(OH)D concentration; 3) Association between Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19; 4) Co-morbidity frequency; 5) Ethnicity frequency.

Heterogeneity assessment

I-square (I2) statistic was used for heterogeneity evaluation. Following Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (7), the I2 was interpreted as follows: “0% to 40%: might not be important; 30% to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity. The importance of the observed value of I2 depends on (i) magnitude and direction of effects and (ii) strength of evidence for heterogeneity (e.g., P-value from the chi-squared test, or a confidence interval for I2).” Thus, the random-effects model was used for pooling the outcomes in case of heterogeneity; otherwise, the inverse variance fixed-effect model was used. Forest plots were presented to visualize the degree of variation between studies.

Data analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) v. 2.2.064 software. The pooling of effect sizes was done with 95% Confident Interval (CI). The fixed/random-effects model was used according to heterogeneities. In the case of zero frequency, the correction value of 0.1 was used.

Publication bias & sensitivity analysis

Begg’s and Egger’s tests and the funnel plot were used for publication bias evaluation. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Study selection process

The first search through databases resulted in 1030 papers. After removing duplicated papers and first step screening based on title and abstract, 89 papers were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 16 articles were entered into the meta-analysis. PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection process is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection process

Study characteristics

Among the 16 studies included in the meta-analysis, all were designed in retrospective nature, except for one study in prospective nature. The studies’ sample size ranged from 10 to 2903, including 4922 participants. Characteristics of studies entered into the systematic review presented in Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1.

Characteristics of studies entered into the systematic review

Quality assessment

Results of quality assessment for studies entered into meta-analysis based on a modified version of the NOS tool for cross-sectional studies were fair.

Publication bias

Begg’s and Egger’s tests in effect size meta-analysis showed non-significant and significant publication bias for vitamin D status (PB=0.75; PE=0.02, respectively). The funnel plot for publication bias of studies presented in Fig. 2.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Funnel plot for publication bias of studies

Meta-analysis findings

Frequency of Vitamin D status in COVID-19 patients

The meta-analysis of event rates in peer reviewed papers showed that 48% of COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 29%-67%), and in 41% of patients, levels of vitamin D were lower than the normal range (95% CI, 10%-82%) (Fig. 3). To maximize the use of everything that exists, the inclusion of pre-prints data to the meta-analysis resulted in a 48% (95% CI, 33%-63%) deficiency and 29% (95% CI, 8%-65%) insufficiency in vitamin D status (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Forest plot for pooling events of vitamin D status

Mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration

The meta-analysis of mean 25(OH)D concentration was 18 ng/mL among all COVID-19 patients (95% CI, 13-24), 18.20 ng/mL in severe cases (95% CI, 1-35) and 26 ng/mL in non-severe cases (95% CI, 23.89-28.70) (Fig. 4). Also, by including pre-prints, meta-analysis resulted in 20 ng/mL 25(OH)D in all cases, 18 ng/mL and 26 ng/mL in non-severe and severe cases, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Figure 4.
Figure 4. Forest plot for pooling mean 25(OH)D concentrations
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Forest plot for pooling overall co-morbidities frequency
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Forest plot for pooling ethnicity frequency

Co-morbidities

Meta-analysis of available data on co-morbidities frequency in COVID-19 patients were as follows: in non-severe cases, 13.0% cancer, 11.8% chronic kidney disease (CKD), 15.4% cardiovascular diseases (CVD), 30.3% diabetes and 35.7% hypertension (HTN), 12.9% obesity, and 18.3% respiratory diseases (Supplementary Figures 3); in severe cases, 12.6% cancer, 34.2% CKD, 30.4% CVD, 41.9% diabetes and 72.6% HTN, 26.4% obesity, and 17.4% respiratory diseases (Supplementary Figures 4); in overall, 7.4% cancer, 27.1% CKD, 30.4% CVD, 5.1% dementia, 14.5% depression/anxiety, 32.1% diabetes, 47.4% HTN, 22.0% obesity and 17.5% respiratory diseases. Frequency of co-morbidities by including pre-prints is presented in Supplementary Figures 5 to 7.

Ethnicity frequency

Pooling available data regarding ethnicity distribution among COVID-19 patients resulted in 1.0% Afro-Caribbean, 10.3% Asian, and 92.1% Caucasian.

Discussion

Epidemiological & clinical aspects

Although comparing global statistics of COVID-19 outcomes is difficult, it is clear that the mortality rate is higher in several countries. It seems that among various factors such as age, healthcare system quality, general health status, socioeconomic status, etc. One of the underestimated factors that might be associated with COVID-19 outcome is the vitamin D status in every population. In recent years, vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency has become a global health issue, and its impact has been studied on respiratory viral infections. Most of the epidemiological studies have been reported a higher risk of developing the infection to the severe stages and death in patients with low levels of vitamin D (24-27). Besides, vitamin D clinical interventions have demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of respiratory tract infection (RTI), further proposed as a prophylactic or treatment approach against RTIs by WHO in 2017 (28-30).

Concerning all of the limitations and lack of high-quality data about the relation of vitamin D status and COVID-19 after several months, we have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to maximize the use of every available data, which would give us an overview toward further studies like what we have done recently on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients (31), which have underestimated first, but the value was revealed after a while.

According to available data entered into our meta-analysis, we could find that approximately half of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 were suffering from vitamin D deficiency, and this vitamin was insufficient in about 41% of them. We have also found that mean 25(OH)D levels were low (<20 ng/mL) in all COVID-19 patients. These findings are in the same line with studies that have debated the association of vitamin D and COVID-19 (32-36). Recently, Kaufman et al. (37), studied the relation of SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates with circulation 25(OH)D among 191,779 patients retrospectively. They found the highest SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among patients with vitamin D deficiency (12.5%, 95% CI, 12.2-12.8%). Overall, the study indicated a significant inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating 25(OH)D levels in COVID-19 patients.

Along with all observational studies, a pilot randomized clinical trial performed by Castillo et al. (38) on 76 hospitalized COVID-19 patients indicated a promising result for calcifediol therapy in these individuals. In this study, high dose oral calcifediol significantly reduced the need for intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. However, due to the small sample size, more extensive, well-organized clinical trials are needed to robust and confirm this study’s findings.

Additionally, in the case of vitamin D supplements’ benefits against acute respiratory tract infections, Martineau et al. conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled on 10.933 participants and resulted in an inverse association between vitamin D levels and risk of acute respiratory tract infections. Thus, it can be concluded that patients with lower vitamin D levels or patients with vitamin D deficiency are at higher risk of developing the disease to the severe form (28).

Co-morbidities

After months of investigation on COVID-19, several factors such as male sex, older age, CVD, HTN, chronic lung disease, obesity, and CKD are proposed to be risk factors toward deteriorating COVID-19 patients’ outcomes (39-41). Interestingly, one of the conditions that lead to most of the considered risk factors is vitamin D deficiency. Studies indicated that malignancies, diabetes, HTN, and CVDs are significantly related to vitamin D deficiency. Also, studies reported the important role of vitamin D deficiency in older males (42-44). Evidence shows that aging, physical activity, obesity, seasonal variation, less vitamin D absorption, pregnancy, thyroid disorders, prolonged use of corticosteroids, ethnicity/race can substantially affect the circulating 25(OH)D levels (45-51).

Hence, although studies reported vitamin D deficiency as one of the critical risk factors in clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients, it seems that it can also be in a strong relationship with basic underlying risk factors and diseases in such patients.

In this case, our analyses indicated that HTN, CVDs, CKDs, diabetes, obesity, and respiratory diseases were the most frequent co-morbidities in COVID-19 patients. According to the facts mentioned above and our findings, it is plausible that both vitamin D deficiency and underlying diseases, which affect each other, may worsen the condition of these patients more than others.

Ethnicity

From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, different studies have been reported probable associations between COVID-19 and the ethnicity of these patients. Most studies found that the mortality rate among black people is higher than the other ethnic groups (52-56). However, other challenges such as human resources, health care systems budgetary, poor management, etc. have to be considered among such people and low-income countries (57-59), which unavoidably affects the subject significantly. In recent years, many studies have focused on vitamin D mechanisms and status among various ethnic groups to find the roles of vitamin D and its relationships with any factors or disorders in various ethnicities (60-63).

Herein, our findings demonstrated that the most frequent ethnic group has belonged to Caucasians, followed by Asian and Afro-Caribbean. Although there is some evidence on the role of genetic variants in COVID-19 patients, the subject is still not clear enough (64, 65).

In contrast to many studies about vitamin D status in different ethnicities, Aloia et al. have reported that serum 25(OH)D concentration is the same in cross-racial comparison. They found an inconsistency between monoclonal and polyclonal assays for detecting vitamin D binding protein (66). Hence, the approach for considering serum 25(OH)D concentration is much important.

Vitamin D mechanisms & COVID-19

Vitamin D metabolism has been well studied throughout history. Numerous investigations indicate vitamin D’s roles in reducing microbial infections through a physical barrier, natural immunity, and adaptive immunity (2, 67-72). For example, investigations on respiratory infections indicated that 25(OH)D could effectively induce the host defense peptides against bacterial or viral agents. Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency can lead to non-communicable and infectious diseases (2, 73, 74). The other potential role of vitamin D is reducing inflammatory induced following SARS-CoV-2 infection by suppressing inflammatory cytokines, reducing leukocytes’ infiltration, interaction with polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and inhibiting complement component C3 (24, 75-79). Also, according to the available evidence for infections and malignancies (80, 81), vitamin D may enhance the serological response and CD8+ T lymphocytes performance against COVID-19 when the T cells’ exhaustion is related to the critical stages of the disease (82-84).

Besides, according to the revealed association of SARS-CoV-2 and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), this virus can substantially downregulate the ACE2 expression, which seems to leads the COVID-19 patients to deterioration (85-87). In contrast, vitamin D affects the renin-angiotensin system pathway and promotes the expression of ACE2 (88, 89). However, since the high expression of ACE2 can be a risk factor for the severity of the disease (90), it is not yet clear enough to conclude how much vitamin D helps the condition. Hence, more evidence and trials are needed to design a treatment plan for three groups of mild, moderate, and severe patients.

It is worth noticing that the current meta-analysis includes the following limitations:1) studies entered into the meta-analysis were observational and cross-sectional; 2) There are inevitable challenges with the reliability of data due to different strategies in a testing (e.g., vitamin D measurement, COVID-19 test, etc.), various subpopulations, etc.; 3) other immunomodulatory factors (e.g., vitamin C, zinc, selenium, etc.), which might be influential in the outcome of COVID-19 patients, have not considered in included studies; and 4) type II statistical errors following studies with small sample size. Eventually, to overcome the limitations and bias, the study’s results should be confirmed by robustly large multicentral randomized clinical trials.

Conclusion

The conditional evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a critical supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against pathogens. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that mean serum 25(OH)D level was low (<20 ng/mL) in all COVID-19 patients and most of them were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. The Caucasian was the dominant ethnic group, and the most frequent co-morbidities in COVID-19 patients were HTN, CVDs, CKDs, diabetes, obesity, and respiratory diseases, which might be affected by vitamin D deficiency directly or indirectly. However, further large clinical trials following comprehensive meta-analysis should be taken into account to achieve more reliable findings.

Data Availability

N/A

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our appreciation to the Student Research Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences for approving this student research proposal with the code 7904.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Organization WH. Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    Greiller CL, Martineau AR. Modulation of the immune response to respiratory viruses by vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4240–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Zdrenghea MT, Makrinioti H, Bagacean C, Bush A, Johnston SL, Stanciu LA. Vitamin D modulation of innate immune responses to respiratory viral infections. Reviews in medical virology. 2017;27(1).
  4. 4.↵
    Aranow C. Vitamin D and the immune system. Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research. 2011;59(6):881–6.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    Goncalves-Mendes N, Talvas J, Dualé C, Guttmann A, Corbin V, Marceau G, et al. Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation on Influenza Vaccine Response and Immune Functions in Deficient Elderly Persons: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:65.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Grant WB, Giovannucci E. The possible roles of solar ultraviolet-B radiation and vitamin D in reducing case-fatality rates from the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in the United States. Dermato-endocrinology. 2009;1(4):215–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0. 2nd Edition ed: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
  8. 8.
    De Smet D, De Smet K, Herroelen P, Gryspeerdt S, Martens GA. Vitamin D deficiency as risk factor for severe COVID-19: a convergence of two pandemics. medRxiv. 2020:2020.05.01.20079376.
  9. 9.
    Di Nicola M, Dattoli L, Moccia L, Pepe M, Janiri D, Fiorillo A, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and psychological distress symptoms in patients with affective disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020:104869.
  10. 10.
    Macaya F, Espejo Paeres C, Valls A, Fernández-Ortiz A, González Del Castillo J, Martín-Sánchez J, et al. Interaction between age and vitamin D deficiency in severe COVID-19 infection. Nutr Hosp. 2020.
  11. 11.
    Karahan S, Katkat F. Impact of Serum 25(OH) Vitamin D Level on Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in Turkey. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2020.
  12. 12.
    Faniyi AA, Lugg ST, Faustini SE, Webster C, Duffy JE, Hewison M, et al. Vitamin D status and seroconversion for COVID-19 in UK healthcare workers who isolated for COVID-19 like symptoms during the 2020 pandemic. medRxiv. 2020.
  13. 13.
    Im JH, Je YS, Baek J, Chung M-H, Kwon HY, Lee J-S. Nutritional status of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020.
  14. 14.
    Lau FH, Majumder R, Torabi R, Saeg F, Hoffman R, Cirillo JD, et al. Vitamin D Insufficiency is Prevalent in Severe COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020:2020.04.24.20075838.
  15. 15.
    Maghbooli Z, Sahraian MA, Ebrahimi M, Pazoki M, Kafan S, Tabriz HM, et al. Vitamin D sufficiency, a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. PloS one. 2020;15(9):e0239799.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    Cuñat T, Ojeda A, Calvo A. Vitamin D Supplementation Could Possibly Improve Clinical Outcomes of Patients Infected with Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Research Square. 2020.
  17. 17.
    Baktash V, Hosack T, Patel N, Shah S, Kandiah P, Van den Abbeele K, et al. Vitamin D status and outcomes for hospitalised older patients with COVID-19. Postgrad Med J. 2020:postgradmedj-2020-138712.
  18. 18.
    Pinzon RT, Angela A, Pradana AW. Vitamin D Defciency Among Patients with COVID-19 : Case Series and Recent Literature Review. Research Square. 2020.
  19. 19.
    Meltzer DO, Best TJ, Zhang H, Vokes T, Arora V, Solway J. Association of Vitamin D Status and Other Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2019722.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    Faul JL, Kerley CP, Love B, O’Neill E, Cody C, Tormey W, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency and ARDS after SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Ir Med J. 2020;113(5):84.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    Merzon E, Tworowski D, Gorohovski A, Vinker S, Golan Cohen A, Green I, et al. Low plasma 25(OH) vitamin D level is associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection: an Israeli population-based study. The FEBS Journal. 2020;n/a(n/a).
  22. 22.
    Panagiotou G, Tee SA, Ihsan Y, Athar W, Marchitelli G, Kelly D, et al. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity. Clinical Endocrinology. 2020;n/a(n/a).
  23. 23.
    Carpagnano GE, Di Lecce V, Quaranta VN, Zito A, Buonamico E, Capozza E, et al. Vitamin D deficiency as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Research Square. 2020.
  24. 24.↵
    Teymoori-Rad M, Shokri F, Salimi V, Marashi SM. The interplay between vitamin D and viral infections. Reviews in medical virology. 2019;29(2):e2032.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    McNally JD, Leis K, Matheson LA, Karuananyake C, Sankaran K, Rosenberg AM. Vitamin D deficiency in young children with severe acute lower respiratory infection. Pediatric pulmonology. 2009;44(10):981–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.
    Belderbos ME, Houben ML, Wilbrink B, Lentjes E, Bloemen EM, Kimpen JLL, et al. Cord blood vitamin D deficiency is associated with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):e1513–e20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Inamo Y, Hasegawa M, Saito K, Hayashi R, Ishikawa T, Yoshino Y, et al. Serum vitamin D concentrations and associated severity of acute lower respiratory tract infections in Japanese hospitalized children. Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. 2011;53(2):199–201.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;356:i6583.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.
    Bergman P, Lindh AU, Björkhem-Bergman L, Lindh JD. Vitamin D and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e65835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Aponte R, MSHN, Palacios C. Vitamin D for prevention of respiratory tract infections. WHO; e-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA). 2017.
  31. 31.↵
    Shamshirian A, Hessami A, Heydari K, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Yip GW, et al. Hydroxychloroquine Versus COVID-19: A Periodic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020:2020.04.14.20065276.
  32. 32.↵
    Carter SJ, Baranauskas MN, Fly AD. Considerations for Obesity, Vitamin D, and Physical Activity Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obesity. 2020;28(7):1176–7.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.
    Ilie PC, Stefanescu S, Smith L. The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2020;32(7):1195–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.
    Jakovac H. COVID-19 and vitamin D—Is there a link and an opportunity for intervention? American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020;318(5):E589–E.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.
    Molloy E, Murphy. Vitamin D, Covid-19 and Children. Ir Med J. 2020;113:64.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Zemb P, Bergman P, Camargo CA, Jr.., Cavalier E, Cormier C, Courbebaisse M, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. 2020;22:133–4.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Kaufman HW, Niles JK, Kroll MH, Bi C, Holick MF. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. PloS one. 2020;15(9):e0239252.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Entrenas Castillo M, Entrenas Costa LM, Vaquero Barrios JM, Alcalá Díaz JF, López Miranda J, Bouillon R, et al. “Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study”. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;203:105751-.
  39. 39.↵
    Holman N, Knighton P, Kar P, O’Keefe J, Curley M, Weaver A, et al. Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: a population-based cohort study. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2020;8(10):823–33.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.
    Centers for Disease C, Prevention, editors. People with certain medical conditions 2020: CDC.
  41. 41.↵
    Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 -United States, February 12-March 28, 2020. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2020;69(13):382–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Orwoll E, Nielson CM, Marshall LM, Lambert L, Holton KF, Hoffman AR, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in older men. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2009;94(4):1214–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.
    Mosekilde L. Vitamin D and the elderly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;62(3):265–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    La Vignera S, Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, Torre F, Aversa A, Calogero AE. Sex-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Mortality: Among Hormone-Modulated ACE2 Expression, Risk of Venous Thromboembolism and Hypovitaminosis D. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(8).
  45. 45.↵
    Yang C-Y, Leung PSC, Adamopoulos IE, Gershwin ME. The implication of vitamin D and autoimmunity: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;45(2):217–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    Vranić L, Mikolašević I, Milić S. Vitamin D Deficiency: Consequence or Cause of Obesity? Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(9):541.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.
    Kim D. The Role of Vitamin D in Thyroid Diseases. International journal of molecular sciences. 2017;18(9):1949.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    Kdekian A, Alssema M, Van Der Beek EM, Greyling A, Vermeer MA, Mela DJ, et al. Impact of isocaloric exchanges of carbohydrate for fat on postprandial glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and free fatty acid responses-a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;74(1):1–8.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Škrabáková Z, Gonzalez-Gross M, Valtueña J, De Henauw S, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;103(4):1033–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.
    Weishaar T, Rajan S, Keller B. Probability of Vitamin D Deficiency by Body Weight and Race/Ethnicity. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. 2016;29(2):226–32.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Correia A, Azevedo Mdo S, Gondim F, Bandeira F. Ethnic aspects of vitamin D deficiency. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia. 2014;58(5):540–4.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Yancy CW. COVID-19 and African Americans. Jama. 2020.
  53. 53.
    Milam AJ, Furr-Holden D, Edwards-Johnson J, Webb B, Patton JW, Ezekwemba NC, et al. Are Clinicians Contributing to Excess African American COVID-19 Deaths? Unbeknownst to Them, They May Be. Health equity. 2020;4(1):139–41.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.
    Laurencin CT, McClinton A. The COVID-19 Pandemic: a Call to Action to Identify and Address Racial and Ethnic Disparities. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2020;7(3):398–402.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.
    Khunti K, Singh AK, Pareek M, Hanif W. Is ethnicity linked to incidence or outcomes of covid-19? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2020;369:m1548.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Hastie CE, Mackay DF, Ho F, Celis-Morales CA, Katikireddi SV, Niedzwiedz CL, et al. Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank. Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2020;14(4):561–5.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    Moszynski P. WHO report highlights Africa’s health challenges. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2006;333(7578):1088.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  58. 58.
    Oleribe OO, Momoh J, Uzochukwu BS, Mbofana F, Adebiyi A, Barbera T, et al. Identifying Key Challenges Facing Healthcare Systems In Africa And Potential Solutions. International journal of general medicine. 2019;12:395–403.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    Organization WH. The African regional health report 2014: The health of the people. 2014.
  60. 60.↵
    Yuen AW, Jablonski NG. Vitamin D: in the evolution of human skin colour. Medical hypotheses. 2010;74(1):39–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.
    Word AP, Perese F, Tseng LC, Adams-Huet B, Olsen NJ, Chong BF. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels in African-American and Caucasian/Hispanic subjects with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The British journal of dermatology. 2012;166(2):372–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.
    Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, Zonderman AB, Berg AH, Nalls M, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D status of black Americans and white Americans. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;369(21):1991–2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    Bikle D, Christakos S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action - addressing the skin as source and target. Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2020;16(4):234–52.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Darbeheshti F, Rezaei N. Genetic predisposition models to COVID-19 infection. Medical hypotheses. 2020;142:109818.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, a global initiative to elucidate the role of host genetic factors in susceptibility and severity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2020;28(6):715–8.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    Aloia J, Mikhail M, Dhaliwal R, Shieh A, Usera G, Stolberg A, et al. Free 25(OH)D and the Vitamin D Paradox in African Americans. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2015;100(9):3356–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;357(3):266–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.
    Hewison M. An update on vitamin D and human immunity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;76(3):315–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.
    Beard JA, Bearden A, Striker R. Vitamin D and the anti-viral state. Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2011;50(3):194–200.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.
    Abhimanyu, Coussens AK. The role of UV radiation and vitamin D in the seasonality and outcomes of infectious disease. Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology. 2017;16(3):314–38.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.
    Rondanelli M, Miccono A, Lamburghini S, Avanzato I, Riva A, Allegrini P, et al. Self-Care for Common Colds: The Pivotal Role of Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc, and Echinacea in Three Main Immune Interactive Clusters (Physical Barriers, Innate and Adaptive Immunity) Involved during an Episode of Common Colds-Practical Advice on Dosages and on the Time to Take These Nutrients/Botanicals in order to Prevent or Treat Common Colds. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM. 2018;2018:5813095.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    Grant WB, Boucher BJ. Yes, vitamin D can be a magic bullet. Clinical Nutrition. 2020;39(5):1627.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Hansdottir S, Monick MM, Hinde SL, Lovan N, Look DC, Hunninghake GW. Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: potential effects on host defense. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2008;181(10):7090–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    Olliver M, Spelmink L, Hiew J, Meyer-Hoffert U, Henriques-Normark B, Bergman P. Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D on innate and adaptive immune responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013;208(9):1474–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    Grant WB, Lahore H, McDonnell SL, Baggerly CA, French CB, Aliano JL, et al. Evidence that Vitamin D Supplementation Could Reduce Risk of Influenza and COVID-19 Infections and Deaths. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):988.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.
    Xu H, Soruri A, Gieseler RKH, Peters JH. 1, 25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 exerts opposing effects to IL-4 on MHC class-II antigen expression, accessory activity, and phagocytosis of human monocytes. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 1993;38(6):535–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.
    Hirsch D, Archer FE, Joshi-Kale M, Vetrano AM, Weinberger B. Decreased anti-inflammatory responses to vitamin D in neonatal neutrophils. Mediators of inflammation. 2011;2011.
  78. 78.
    Risitano AM, Mastellos DC, Huber-Lang M, Yancopoulou D, Garlanda C, Ciceri F, et al. Complement as a target in COVID-19? Nature reviews Immunology. 2020;20(6):343–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    Gralinski LE, Sheahan TP, Morrison TE, Menachery VD, Jensen K, Leist SR, et al. Complement Activation Contributes to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Pathogenesis. mBio. 2018;9(5).
  80. 80.↵
    Karkeni E, Morin SO, Bou Tayeh B, Goubard A, Josselin E, Castellano R, et al. Vitamin D Controls Tumor Growth and CD8+ T Cell Infiltration in Breast Cancer. Frontiers in immunology. 2019;10:1307.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    Chadha MK, Fakih M, Muindi J, Tian L, Mashtare T, Johnson CS, et al. Effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D status on serological response to influenza vaccine in prostate cancer patients. The Prostate. 2011;71(4):368–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    Zheng M, Gao Y, Wang G, Song G, Liu S, Sun D, et al. Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cellular & molecular immunology. 2020;17(5):533–5.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.
    Moon C. Fighting COVID-19 exhausts T cells. Nature reviews Immunology. 2020;20(5):277.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. 84.↵
    Minton K. DAMP-driven metabolic adaptation. Nature reviews Immunology. 2020;20(1):1.
    OpenUrl
  85. 85.↵
    Xiao L, Sakagami H, Miwa N. ACE2: The key Molecule for Understanding the Pathophysiology of Severe and Critical Conditions of COVID-19: Demon or Angel? Viruses. 2020;12(5):491.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.
    van de Veerdonk F, Netea MG, van Deuren M, van der Meer JWM, de Mast Q, Bruggemann RJ, et al. Kinins and cytokines in COVID-19: a comprehensive pathophysiological approach. 2020.
  87. 87.↵
    Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    Mitchell F. Vitamin-D and COVID-19: do deficient risk a poorer outcome? The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2020.
  89. 89.↵
    Machado CDS, Ferro Aissa A, Ribeiro DL, Antunes LMG. Vitamin D supplementation alters the expression of genes associated with hypertension and did not induce DNA damage in rats. Journal of toxicology and environmental health Part A. 2019;82(4):299–313.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.↵
    Gracia-Ramos AE. Is the ACE2 Overexpression a Risk Factor for COVID-19 Infection? Archives of medical research. 2020;51(4):345–6.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted October 26, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
The Role of Vitamin D in The Age of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Roya Ghasemian, Amir Shamshirian, Keyvan Heydari, Mohammad Malekan, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh, Hamed Jafarpour, Arash Rezaei Shahmirzadi, Mehrdad Khodabandeh, Benyamin Seyfari, Alireza Motamedzadeh, Ehsan Dadgostar, Marzieh Aalinezhad, Meghdad Sedaghat, Morteza Behnamfar, Anahita Asadi, Bahman Zarandi, Nazanin Razzaghi, Vahid Yaghoubi Naei, Amirhossein Hessami, Soheil Azizi, Ali Reza Mohseni, Danial Shamshirian
medRxiv 2020.06.05.20123554; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.05.20123554
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area