Abstract
A simplified model applied to COVID-19 cases detected and officially published by the italian government [1], seems to fit quite well the time evolution of the disease in Italy during the period feb-24th - may-19th 2020.
The hypothesis behind the model is based on the fact that in the lockdown period the infection cannot be transmitted due to social isolation and, more generally, due to the strong protection measures in place during the observation period. In this case a compartment model is used and the interactions between the different compartments are simplified. The sample of cases detected is intended as a set of individuals susceptible to infection which, after being exposed and undergoing the infection, were isolated (‘treated’) in such a way they can no longer spread the infection.
The values obtained are to be considered indicative.
The same model has been applied both to the data relating to Italy and to some regions of Italy (Lombardia, Piemonte, Lazio, Campania, Calabria, Sicilia, Sardegna), generally finding a good response and indicatively interesting values (see chap. 5).
The only tuning parameter is the ‘incubation period’ τ that, together with the calculated growth rate κ of the exponential curve used to approximate the early stage data, in this modelization, are in strong relationship with the compartments’ transfer rates.
In particular ℛ0 and the numerical value of κ (dimensionless) in this model are linked by the relation: ℛ0 = 1/κ2
Revision # 1
Errata corrige in section 1 (Introduction): the equations that summarize the relationship between the parameters were wrong. This revised version contains the correct equations at page 2.
The synchronization criteria is updated. No need to use a threshold different to the one used to determine the growth coefficient. The results are now updated with the synchronization point near to the 20% of the maximum value of the cases detected per day:
Modifications in section 4 (Model results for Italy). It is appropriate to use an exponential function instead of a logistic function to find the growth rate in the initial phase. Section 4 and the results are now updated.
Some non-substantial corrections in the descriptive part.
Revision # 2
Errata corrige in the system differential equation 6: in the the derivative of S were reported a wrong additional term N. Now the equation 6 is correct.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research is personal, IRB ethical committee not applicable.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
ro.simeone{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
Public data from Dipartimento della Protezione Civile Italia.
https://github.com/pcm-dpc/COVID-19/blob/master/dati-regioni/dpc-covid19-ita-regioni.csv
http://opendatadpc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/b0c68bce2cce478eaac82fe38d4138b1