Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A comparative evaluation of a dye-based and probe-based RT-qPCR assay for the screening of SARS-CoV-2 using individual and pooled-sample testing

Claudio Verdugo, Anita Plaza, Gerardo Acosta-Jamett, Natalia Castro, Josefina Gutiérrez, Carlos Hernández, Carmen López-Joven, Carlos A. Loncoman, Claudio Navarrete, Alfredo Ramírez-Reveco, Alex Romero, Andrea Silva, Matías Vega, Cristóbal Verdugo, Jonathan Vergara-Amado
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.30.20117721
Claudio Verdugo
1Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Lab, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: claudioverdugo@uach.cl anitaplazaflores@gmail.com
Anita Plaza
2Unidad de Nefrología, Instituto de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: claudioverdugo@uach.cl anitaplazaflores@gmail.com
Gerardo Acosta-Jamett
3Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Castro
3Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josefina Gutiérrez
1Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Lab, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Hernández
1Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Lab, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen López-Joven
3Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos A. Loncoman
4Laboratorio de Bioquímica Farmacológica, Virología y Biotecnología, Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudio Navarrete
1Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Lab, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfredo Ramírez-Reveco
5Laboratorio de Criobiología, Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Romero
6Laboratorio de Inmunología y Estrés de Organismos Acuáticos, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Silva
7AustralOmics, Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Desarrollo y Creación Artística, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matías Vega
6Laboratorio de Inmunología y Estrés de Organismos Acuáticos, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristóbal Verdugo
3Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Vergara-Amado
1Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Lab, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Effective interventions are mandatory to control the transmission and spread of SARS-CoV-2, a highly contagious virus causing devastating effects worldwide. Cost-effective approaches are pivotal tools required to increase the detection rates and escalate further in massive surveillance programs, especially in countries with limited resources that most of the efforts have focused on symptomatic cases only. Here, we compared the performance of the RT-qPCR using an intercalating dye with the probe-based assay. Then, we tested and compared these two RT-qPCR chemistries in different pooling systems: after RNA extraction (post-RNA extraction) and before RNA extraction (pre-RNA extraction) optimizing by pool size and template volume. We evaluated these approaches in 610 clinical samples. Our results show that the dye-based technique has a high analytical sensitivity similar to the probe-based detection assay used worldwide. Further, this assay may also be applicable in testing by pool systems post-RNA extraction up to 20 samples. However, the most efficient system for massive surveillance, the pre-RNA extraction pooling approach, was obtained with the probe-based assay in test up to 10 samples adding 13.5 µL of RNA template. The low cost and the potential use in pre-RNA extraction pool systems, place of this assays as a valuable resource for scalable sampling to larger populations. Implementing a pool system for population sampling results in an important savings of laboratory resources and time, which are two key factors during an epidemic outbreak. Using the pooling approaches evaluated here, we are confident that it can be used as a valid alternative assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human samples.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the Gobierno Regional de Los Rios (Chile) and Universidad Austral de Chile.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB body are included in the manuscript.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, and/or on request from the corresponding author, CV.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A comparative evaluation of a dye-based and probe-based RT-qPCR assay for the screening of SARS-CoV-2 using individual and pooled-sample testing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A comparative evaluation of a dye-based and probe-based RT-qPCR assay for the screening of SARS-CoV-2 using individual and pooled-sample testing
Claudio Verdugo, Anita Plaza, Gerardo Acosta-Jamett, Natalia Castro, Josefina Gutiérrez, Carlos Hernández, Carmen López-Joven, Carlos A. Loncoman, Claudio Navarrete, Alfredo Ramírez-Reveco, Alex Romero, Andrea Silva, Matías Vega, Cristóbal Verdugo, Jonathan Vergara-Amado
medRxiv 2020.05.30.20117721; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.30.20117721
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A comparative evaluation of a dye-based and probe-based RT-qPCR assay for the screening of SARS-CoV-2 using individual and pooled-sample testing
Claudio Verdugo, Anita Plaza, Gerardo Acosta-Jamett, Natalia Castro, Josefina Gutiérrez, Carlos Hernández, Carmen López-Joven, Carlos A. Loncoman, Claudio Navarrete, Alfredo Ramírez-Reveco, Alex Romero, Andrea Silva, Matías Vega, Cristóbal Verdugo, Jonathan Vergara-Amado
medRxiv 2020.05.30.20117721; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.30.20117721

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1256)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
  • Dermatology (148)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10047)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2481)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1652)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11888)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2301)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1257)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (737)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2294)
  • Public and Global Health (4850)
  • Radiology and Imaging (846)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (228)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)