COVID-19 higher morbidity and mortality in Chinese regions with lower air quality

COVID-19, initially detected in China and rapidly spread to the rest of the world, has ignited a pandemic at an exorbitant human cost. In a span of just over three months, eastern and western doctors, biologists, and sociologists alike have turned their attention at disentangling the aetiology of this disease. Various risk factors have been implicated with the fast spread of the virus, assuming different characters whether considered within or between countries. On an individual level, older age, male gender and smoking status have all been shown to increase the virulence of SARS-CoV-2¹.

From the standpoint of the natural sciences and evolution, we can take a broader perspective beyond virological and medical mechanisms to appreciate how a coronavirus transmitted once more from an animal species to us. Elements including human and livestock overpopulation, biodiversity loss and climate change played a critical role in making the ground suitable for a new epidemics to flourish^2,3. Zoonoses should not be treated so that wildlife is blamed, the actual problem is the human exploitation of wildlife^4,5.

Pertaining to climate change, air pollution is notoriously known to cause health problems and, in particular, viral respiratory infections and pneumonia to individuals exposed for several days a year^6,7.

From our perspective as biologists, economists and geographers, we have investigated the expansion of the infection in China (with Hong Kong and Taiwan included – data from the Chinese government health commission⁸) and we have correlated it with the annual tropospheric column measurements of several air pollutants sampled from the Sentinel-5 satellite time series (data from the European Space Agency portal⁹) as well as data derived from traditional air quality stations¹⁰. The data were updated on 23 May 2020, well after the first, main infection wave and they include the major 17 April update (at the time, an increase of 1,290 casualties, about 50% from the previous figure, and an increase of 325 infections for the city of Wuhan only). See Table 1 for a comprehensive summary of the data.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1

Distribution of COVID-19 infections, fatalities and mortality rates across the prefectures of China (updated on 23 May 2020), and the distribution of the tropospheric column amounts of three representative air pollutants derived from satellite (2019 averages): Nitrogen Dioxide (NO₂), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Formaldehyde (HCHO). The values in the square brackets show the COVID-19 cases’ counts of administrative units.

Controlling for varying population sizes¹¹, we find more viral infections and fatalities in those Chinese prefectures afflicted by common pollutants of the air: CO, HCHO, PM 2.5, PM 10, and NO₂. All correlation tests were performed using Kendall’s Tau with the significance threshold set to 0.05. Aerosol data from the satellite, which include PM 2.5 and PM 10, were not associated with a higher mortality. This is not surprising, they in fact comprise non-pollutant, inert particulates such as dust, sand and sea salt. On the other hand, statistics suggested that higher levels of O₃ and SO₂ were not associated to more COVID-19 deaths, which goes against the trends of the other pollutants, an aspect that requires further investigation. A comprehensive statistical output is reported in Table 2.

Despite the fact the SARS-CoV-2 was first detected in Wuhan and that the first location of the pathogen assumes a key role in the geographical spread of the infection, the detrimental effect that air pollution assumes at a national level remains evident. This trend in fact holds after removing (1) Wuhan city and (2) the whole Hubei province from the dataset in succession (see Table 2S.I. and £S.I.). Although the measures to contain the virus taken by the Chinese government were effective when compared to other countries affected by what later became a pandemic, the strong association between air pollution and higher morbidity and mortality rates can be detected even where the series of outbreaks originated from.

Although free health care was dispensed to everyone in the exceptional case of this epidemics, the Chinese health system, as those ones of many other countries, is not adequate at including risk factors as comorbidity elements to prevent diseases and allow for free health care accordingly¹². We hypothesise that the correlational significance we have found points towards air pollution as a critical risk cofactor for COVID-19, also because of other studies. (1) Testing the more proximal hypothesis that COVID-19 outbreaks could follow with a temporal delay from days with high NO₂ presence in the air, colleagues in Shanghai are publishing detailed time series suggesting a delay of 12 days before hospitalisations for the Hubei province¹³. This may even suggest the role of air pollutants as airborne vectors for this virus¹⁴, later also suggested by another study¹⁵ run in three cities in Hubei province. At a Chinese national level, PM 2.5 and NO₂ pollution from ground stations was recently found correlated with this pathology incidence, after adjusting for some socioeconomic factors and human movements following the Spring festival¹⁶. (2) In the United States, chronic exposure to high levels of PM 2.5 have been found co-responsible for 20-time higher mortality rate of respiratory diseases, specifically in 2020, that is in presence of COVID-19¹⁷. This is a rate much higher than other American demographic co-variables. (3) In Italy, a similar positive correlation controlling for further demographic variables was also reported¹⁸, with the additional and novel evidence that fragments of the RNA from this virus were found in the particulate matter of the harshly hit Italian city of Bergamo¹⁴. (4) Finally, our comprehensive study including eight countries assessed with a similar analysis, confirms this same trend in six out of eight countries¹⁹ (we were in fact the very first to release an analysis comparing chronic exposure to air pollution and a higher morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 in early April²⁰).

As a clear and immediate action to prevent the trajectory of this and future epidemics, curbing climate change^21,22 must be endorsed way more seriously. With no exceptions, it must be endorsed now. Will the smallest of the parasites be able to wake us up this time, so that we start caring about the health of the environment as much as we have been caring about our own and public health?