Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Did the National lockdown lock COVID-19 down in India, and reduce pressure on health infrastructure?

View ORCID ProfileZakir Husain, Arup Kumar Das, Saswata Ghosh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20115329
Zakir Husain
1Professor, Economics Department, Presidency University, Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zakir Husain
  • For correspondence: dzhusain@gmail.com dzhusain@gmail.com
Arup Kumar Das
2Deputy Director, Research, M&E and Learning, LEHS|WISH Foundation, New Delhi Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: arupdas2006@gmail.com
Saswata Ghosh
3Associate Professor, Health & Demography, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ghosh.saswata@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background & objectives The spread of COVID-19 in India has posed a major challenge for policy makers. Policy response in form of imposition of a prolonged national lockdown has imposed substantial costs on the entire population. But the extent to which it has contained the spread of the epidemic needs to be assessed.

Methods We use an Interrupted Time Series model to assess the success of lockdowns in containing COVID-19. In the second step, we use four variants of the SIR models to develop a counterfactual—what would have happened without the lockdown. These results are compared with actual data. The analysis is undertaken for India, and Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi, and Tamil Nadu.

Results Lockdown has reduced the number of COVID-19 cases by 23.65 to 337.73 lakh in Class I cities and towns, where COVID has mainly spread. It has averted about 0.01 to 0.10 lakh deaths. At the regional level, however, lockdown has averted a health crisis as existing ICU and ventilator facilities for critically ill patients would have been inadequate.

Interpretation & conclusions Overall, the results for three of the four models reveal that lockdown has a modest impact on spread of COVID-19; the health infrastructure at the national level is not over strained, even at the peak. At the regional level, on the other hand, lockdowns may have been justified. However, given that identification of new cases is limited by levels of daily testing that are low even by Asian standards, analysis based upon official data may have limitations and result in flawed decisions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding or sponsorship received by us.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

No patient / clinical data was used. SO IRB approval is not required.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data on which the research is based is available publicly. Sources have been cited in submission.

https://www.covid19india.org/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Did the National lockdown lock COVID-19 down in India, and reduce pressure on health infrastructure?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Did the National lockdown lock COVID-19 down in India, and reduce pressure on health infrastructure?
Zakir Husain, Arup Kumar Das, Saswata Ghosh
medRxiv 2020.05.27.20115329; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20115329
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Did the National lockdown lock COVID-19 down in India, and reduce pressure on health infrastructure?
Zakir Husain, Arup Kumar Das, Saswata Ghosh
medRxiv 2020.05.27.20115329; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20115329

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (238)
  • Allergy and Immunology (520)
  • Anesthesia (124)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1417)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (217)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (291)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (582)
  • Epidemiology (10280)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (527)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2622)
  • Geriatric Medicine (254)
  • Health Economics (496)
  • Health Informatics (1728)
  • Health Policy (788)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (671)
  • Hematology (266)
  • HIV/AIDS (564)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12080)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (647)
  • Medical Education (273)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (288)
  • Neurology (2453)
  • Nursing (144)
  • Nutrition (377)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (489)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (566)
  • Oncology (1318)
  • Ophthalmology (400)
  • Orthopedics (145)
  • Otolaryngology (235)
  • Pain Medicine (168)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (342)
  • Pediatrics (776)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (329)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2393)
  • Public and Global Health (4996)
  • Radiology and Imaging (892)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (523)
  • Respiratory Medicine (681)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (255)
  • Sports Medicine (244)
  • Surgery (297)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (140)
  • Urology (108)