Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19

View ORCID ProfileIsobel Braithwaite, View ORCID ProfileTom Callender, Miriam Bullock, View ORCID ProfileRobert W Aldridge
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20114447
Isobel Braithwaite
1UCL Public Health Data Science Research Group, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Isobel Braithwaite
  • For correspondence: Isobel.Braithwaite.13@ucl.ac.uk
Tom Callender
2Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom Callender
Miriam Bullock
3UCL Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, University College London, London UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert W Aldridge
1UCL Public Health Data Science Research Group, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert W Aldridge
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Automated or partially-automated contact tracing tools are being deployed by many countries to contain SARS-CoV-2; however, the evidence base for their use is not well-established.

Methods We undertook a rapid systematic review of automated or partially-automated contact tracing, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020179822). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, OVID Global Health, EBSCO COVID Portal, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv and Google Advanced for articles relevant to COVID-19, SARS, MERS, influenza or Ebola from 1/1/200014/4/2020. Two authors reviewed all full-text manuscripts. One reviewer extracted data using a pre-piloted form; a second independently verified extracted data. Primary outcomes were the number or proportion of contacts (and/or subsequent cases) identified; secondary outcomes were indicators of outbreak control, app/tool uptake, resource use, cost-effectiveness and lessons learnt. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool or CHEERS checklist were used in quality assessment.

Findings 4,033 citations were identified and 15 were included. No empirical evidence of automated contact tracing’s effectiveness (regarding contacts identified or transmission reduction) was identified. Four of seven included modelling studies suggested that controlling COVID-19 requires high population uptake of automated contact-tracing apps (estimates from 56% to 95%), typically alongside other control measures. Studies of partially-automated contact tracing generally reported more complete contact identification and follow-up, and greater intervention timeliness (0.5-5 hours faster), than previous systems. No meta-analyses were possible.

Interpretation Automated contact tracing has potential to reduce transmission with sufficient population uptake and usage. However, there is an urgent need for well-designed prospective evaluations as no studies provided empirical evidence of its effectiveness.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20063636v1

Funding Statement

There is no specific funding for this project. IB and TC are NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) Academic Clinical Fellows. RWA is supported by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellowship [206602].

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval and patient consent are not required as this is a systematic review using already published (peer-reviewed and pre-print) articles; we did not access or use any individual patient data for this study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data supporting this systematic review are from previously reported studies, which have been cited. The processed data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary material.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 28, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19
Isobel Braithwaite, Tom Callender, Miriam Bullock, Robert W Aldridge
medRxiv 2020.05.27.20114447; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20114447
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Automated and partially-automated contact tracing: a rapid systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19
Isobel Braithwaite, Tom Callender, Miriam Bullock, Robert W Aldridge
medRxiv 2020.05.27.20114447; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.27.20114447

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (75)
  • Allergy and Immunology (194)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (487)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (167)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5648)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (855)
  • Geriatric Medicine (87)
  • Health Economics (229)
  • Health Informatics (755)
  • Health Policy (385)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (250)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (181)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6437)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (387)
  • Medical Education (116)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (90)
  • Neurology (844)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (161)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (256)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (162)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (45)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (247)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (112)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (958)
  • Public and Global Health (2216)
  • Radiology and Imaging (374)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (171)
  • Respiratory Medicine (310)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)