Abstract
Background The WHO has stated that all health systems haemorrhage money, citing one of the causes of financial leakage as non-compliant billing and fraud. In Australia, it has been estimated that leakage from Medicare caused by non-compliant medical billing may be 10-15% of the scheme’s total cost. Despite a growing body of international research suggesting that rather than deliberately abusing the health financing systems they operate within, medical practitioners may be struggling to understand complex and highly interpretive medical billing rules, there is a lack of research in this area in Australia. The aim of this study was to address this research gap by examining the experiences of Australian medical practitioners as they interact with Australia’s Medicare by engaging in conversations with them about their lived experiences conducting medical billing in grass roots practice.
Method This study interviewed 27 specialist and general medical practitioners who claim Medicare reimbursements in their daily practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results The qualitative data revealed five themes including inadequate induction, poor legal literacy, absence of reliable advice and support, fear and deference, and unmet opportunities for improvement.
Conclusion The qualitative data presented in this study suggest Australian medical practitioners are ill-equipped to manage their Medicare compliance obligations, have low levels of legal literacy and desire education, clarity and certainty around complex billing standards and rules. Non-compliant medical billing under Australia’s Medicare scheme is a nuanced phenomenon that may be far more complex than previously thought. Strategies to address the barriers and deficiencies identified by participants in this study will require a multi-pronged approach. The data suggest that the current system of ensuring compliance by Australian medical practitioners is not fit for purpose.
Competing Interest Statement
Margaret Faux is the CEO of a medical billing company.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Technology Sydney (HREC 2014000060). Written consent was obtained from all participants.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contributorship Statement
Margaret Faux – This paper reports the results of the final phase of a three phase PhD project by Ms Faux. As such Ms Faux wrote the first draft of the paper in its entirety and has finalised all subsequent drafts incorporating feedback and suggestions from the other authors. She is responsible for the concept and design of the study, conducted all data collection and analysed and interpreted the results.
Professor Jon Adams – second author Professor Adams is the co-supervisor of Ms Faux’s Doctorate. Professor Adams has made substantial contributions to later drafts of this paper via review and re-drafting of important intellectual content.
Simran Dahiya – third author Simran Dahiya listened to the audio recordings of all interviews, reviewed the transcripts to ensure accuracy and was also involved in the data analysis and interpretation. She made important contributions to content in the findings and discussion sections of the paper as a result of her close association with the data.
Professor Jon Wardle – last author Professor Wardle is the principal supervisor for Ms Faux’s Doctorate. Professor Wardle has made substantial contributions to this paper at every stage, including having involvement in the proposed concept and design of the study, through to making substantial contributions to the paper via review, critical analysis, feedback and redrafting sections of the paper to refine important intellectual content.
Data Availability
All data is available from the principal researcher upon request.
