Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Psychological impact of Covid-19 lockdown in India: Different strokes for different folks

View ORCID ProfileAnupam Joya Sharma, View ORCID ProfileMalavika A. Subramanyam
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.25.20111716
Anupam Joya Sharma
1Social Epidemiology, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anupam Joya Sharma
  • For correspondence: Anupam.sharma@iitgn.ac.in
Malavika A. Subramanyam
1Social Epidemiology, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Malavika A. Subramanyam
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The psychological impact of the lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic are widely documented. In India, a family-centric society with a high population density and extreme social stratification, the impact of the lockdown might vary across diverse social groups. However, the patterning in the psychological impact of the lockdown among sexual minorities and persons known to be at higher risk of contracting Covid-19 is not known in the Indian context. We used mixed methods (online survey, n=282 and in-depth interviews, n=14) to investigate whether the psychological impact of the lockdown was different across these groups of Indian adults. We fitted linear and logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic covariates. Thematic analysis helped us identify emergent themes in our qualitative narratives. Anxiety was found to be higher among sexual minorities (β=2.44, CI: 0.58, 4.31), high-risk group (β=2.20, CI:0.36, 4.05), and those with history of depression/loneliness (β=3.89, CI:2.34, 5.44). Addiction to pornography was also found to be higher among sexual minorities (β=2.72, CI: 0.09, 5.36). Qualitative findings suggested that sexual minorities likely used pornography and masturbation to cope with the lockdown, given the limited physical access to sexual partners in a society that stigmatizes homosexuality. Moreover, both qualitative and quantitative study findings suggested that greater frequency of calling family members during lockdown could strengthen social relationships and increase social empathy. The study thereby urgently calls for the attention of policymakers to take sensitive and inclusive health decisions for the marginalized and the vulnerable, both during and after the crisis.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received by the authors for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, IIT Gandhinagar.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data cannot be obtained directly because of the sensitive information collected. Please email anupam.sharma@iitgn to obtain the data.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Psychological impact of Covid-19 lockdown in India: Different strokes for different folks
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Psychological impact of Covid-19 lockdown in India: Different strokes for different folks
Anupam Joya Sharma, Malavika A. Subramanyam
medRxiv 2020.05.25.20111716; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.25.20111716
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Psychological impact of Covid-19 lockdown in India: Different strokes for different folks
Anupam Joya Sharma, Malavika A. Subramanyam
medRxiv 2020.05.25.20111716; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.25.20111716

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (553)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1761)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (660)
  • Epidemiology (10803)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (592)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2952)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1930)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (293)
  • HIV/AIDS (631)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12519)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (693)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2801)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1469)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (867)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (366)
  • Primary Care Research (337)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2641)
  • Public and Global Health (5374)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1013)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (596)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (125)