Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Verification of two Alternative Do-it-yourself Equipment Respirators Seal as COVID-19 Protection (VADERS-CoV): a quality assessment pilot study

View ORCID ProfileMarco Pettinger, Mona Momeni, Clemence Michaud, Michel Van Dyck, David Kahn, Guillaume Lemaire
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.23.20111054
Marco Pettinger
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marco Pettinger
  • For correspondence: marco.pettinger@student.uclouvain.be
Mona Momeni
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemence Michaud
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Van Dyck
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kahn
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Lemaire
Department of Anaesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers are facing shortage in personal protective equipment, especially adequate respirators. Alternative do-it-yourself respirators (ADR) emerge, without any proof of protection.

Objective Verify seal potential of two ADR compared to a common FFP2 respirator.

Design Quality assessment pilot study.

Setting Tertiary Care Hospital.

Participants Ten anaesthesiology residents.

Interventions Participants performed quantitative face-fit tests (QNFT) with three respirators to evaluate seal. A common FFP2 respirator was used as baseline (control group). ADR tested in this study are an Anaesthesia Face Mask (AFM) and a full-face Modified Snorkelling Mask (MSM) with a 3D-printed connector, both in conjunction with a breathing system filter.

Main outcome measures Non-inferior seal performance of ADR over FFP2, assessed by calculated QNFT based on measured individual fit factors, as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Results For each respirator a total of 90 individual fit factor measurements were taken. Within the control group, seal failed in 37 (41%) measurements but only in 10 (11%) within the AFM group and in 6 (7%) within the MSM group (P < 0.001 respectively). However, when calculating the final, mean QNFT results, no statistically significant difference was found between respirators. Successful QNFT were determined for 5 out of 10 participants in the control group, for 8 in the AFM group (P = 0.25) and for 7 in the MSM group (P = 0.69).

Conclusion Both ADR do have the potential to provide non inferior seal compared to a common FFP2 respirator. While AFM respirators are easily assembled, snorkelling masks must undergo significant but feasible modifications. Our results suggest that those ADR masks might be further investigated as they seem to be viable alternatives for situations when certified respirators are not available.

Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04375774

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT04375774

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for this study (Ethical Committee No. 2020/15AVR/226) was provided by the Ethical Committee of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium (Chairperson Pr. JM Maloteaux) on April 15 2020. The study was undertaken at the Anaesthesiology Department of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium from April 16 to 20 2020.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Not yet published.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Verification of two Alternative Do-it-yourself Equipment Respirators Seal as COVID-19 Protection (VADERS-CoV): a quality assessment pilot study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Verification of two Alternative Do-it-yourself Equipment Respirators Seal as COVID-19 Protection (VADERS-CoV): a quality assessment pilot study
Marco Pettinger, Mona Momeni, Clemence Michaud, Michel Van Dyck, David Kahn, Guillaume Lemaire
medRxiv 2020.05.23.20111054; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.23.20111054
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Verification of two Alternative Do-it-yourself Equipment Respirators Seal as COVID-19 Protection (VADERS-CoV): a quality assessment pilot study
Marco Pettinger, Mona Momeni, Clemence Michaud, Michel Van Dyck, David Kahn, Guillaume Lemaire
medRxiv 2020.05.23.20111054; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.23.20111054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (412)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (69)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (142)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4843)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (674)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (626)
  • Health Policy (318)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (203)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5326)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (328)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (685)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (114)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (205)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (778)
  • Public and Global Health (1810)
  • Radiology and Imaging (323)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)