Abstract
Aims: Transcriptomic studies have contributed to fundamental knowledge of myocardial remodeling in human heart failure (HF). However, the agreement on key regulated genes in HF is limited and systematic efforts to integrate evidence from multiple patient cohorts are lacking. Here we aimed to provide an unbiased consensus transcriptional signature of human end-stage HF by comprehensive comparison and analysis of publicly available datasets. Methods and Results: We curated and uniformly processed 16 public transcriptomic studies of left ventricular samples from 263 healthy and 653 failing human hearts. Transfer learning approaches revealed conserved disease patterns across all studies independent of technical differences. We meta-analyzed the dysregulation of 14041 genes to extract a consensus signature of HF. Estimation of the activities of 343 transcription factors, 14 signalling pathways, and 182 micro RNAs, as well as the enrichment of 5998 biological processes confirmed the established aspects of the functional landscape of the disease and revealed novel ones. We provide all results in a free public resource https://saezlab.shinyapps.io/reheat/ to facilitate further use and interpretation of the results. We exemplify usage by deciphering fetal gene reprogramming and tracing myocardial origin of the plasma proteome biomarkers in HF patients. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility of combining transcriptional studies from different HF patient cohorts. This compendium provides a robust and consistent collection of molecular markers of end-stage HF that may guide the identification of novel targets with diagnostic or therapeutic relevance. Keywords: Heart Failure, Transcriptomics, Transfer Learning, Knowledge Banks, Consensus Signature, Meta-Analysis
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Informatics for Life funded by the Klaus Tschira Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable. Use of public data.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Processed data can be downloaded from Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/record/3797044#.XsQPMy2B2u5.
