Analysis of Crowdsourced Metformin Tablets from Individuals Reveals Widespread Contamination with N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the United States ==================================================================================================================================================== * Qian Wu * Evgenia Kvitko * Amber Jessop * Shannon Williams * Ryan C. Costantino * Kaury Kucera * David Light ## Abstract Recent reports of metformin drug products contaminated with unacceptable levels of the probable human carcinogen N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) prompted a national sampling of post-market metformin drug products. To most broadly sample the market and minimize supply chain bias, metformin medication samples were crowdsourced directly from individuals across many states in the United States. 128 samples were received, and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry tests for a panel of nitrosamines revealed significant levels of NDMA that trend with labeling company. 42% of all medication samples contained detectable levels of NDMA and, when scaled to maximum daily tablet dose, 36% of all medication samples contained NDMA levels exceeding the FDA daily acceptable intake limit. The highest NDMA detection from the tested samples was 1565 ng per tablet, which, when commonly taken four times a day, is 65 times the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acceptable daily intake limit. Results underscore the need for immediate product recalls of tainted medications and an overall investigation of metformin manufacturing practices. ## Introduction Metformin is one of the frontline medications used to treat type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. It is commonly prescribed when a patient exhibits consistently high blood sugar levels due to the inability of insulin to effectively transport sugar into somatic cells [1] and can be taken for extended periods of time as a maintenance medication. Metformin is prescribed as a combination medication, solution and suspension but is most commonly taken in 500 mg, 750 mg, 850 mg, or 1000 mg immediate or extended release tablets one or more times per day with a recommended maximum daily intake of 2000 mg [2]. Approximately 78 million prescriptions were written for metformin in the United States in 2017 [3]. Some research has likely led people to use metformin off-label as an alternative treatment for prediabetes, polycystic ovarian syndrome, fatty liver disease, weight loss, dementia prevention [4], thyroid disorders, and cancer prevention [5]. Metformin is the only oral medication approved for diabetes treatment in children and has also been used to treat obesity in children and adolescents [6]. Although potential benefits of metformin are numerous, aspects of the manufacturing process could lead to contamination with carcinogenic compounds. One such contaminant, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a nitrosamine compound, is a probable human carcinogen according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer [7]. Nitrosamines formed from reactive pharmaceutical products or as by-products in pharmaceutical synthesis that contaminate drug products have been extensively studied due to health risks since the 1970s [8, 9]. Nitrosamine compound formation and contamination is currently a global concern. These probable human carcinogens may form when manufacturers reuse solvents that are neutralized with nitrite containing compounds in later steps of drug or medication processing. One common example is the use of dimethyl formamide quenched with sodium nitrite [10]. The FDA currently lists the maximum acceptable daily intake of NDMA at 96 ng [11, 12] in accordance with the WHO’s interim guidelines which were set in place in January 2020 to allow manufacturers to adjust procedures to minimize possible nitrosamine contamination [10]. After a two year transition period, European regulations are expected to place tighter limits on this chemical, indicating 30 ng as the maximum daily intake allowed in draft guidance [13]. The United States Pharmacopeia is also designing new methods for determining and limiting the nitrosamine content of medications [14] and the FDA is continuing to investigate potential sources of contamination [15]. Instances of nitrosamine contamination were first detected in mid-2018 in angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) drugs and the FDA issued voluntary recalls of three batches of valsartan manufactured by Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals [16]. The initial recall was expanded to encompass several repackagers and two other ARB medications, irbesartan and losartan. Testing indicated levels of NDMA, N-Nitrosodiethlyamine (NDEA), and N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA) exceeding the FDA’s acceptable limits. As of September 2019, a total of 1159 potentially contaminated ARB products have been affected by recalls [17]. Reports of nitrosamine contamination has since grown to include heartburn and diabetes medications like ranitidine [18] and metformin [19]. Singapore was the first to take action against NDMA contamination in metformin, testing forty-six versions of the medication available in that country. Of those products, three were found to contain unacceptable levels of NDMA and were recalled in early December 2019 [20]. Switzerland [21] and Canada [22] soon launched their own investigations following Singapore’s recall. In Switzerland, Streuli Pharma recalled twenty batches of metformin products [23] within weeks. Canada announced its initial recalls in February 2020, pulling ten batches with excessive levels of NDMA and four more with levels approaching the acceptable limit. One month later, an additional twenty-six lots were recalled as a precautionary measure [24]. Investigations are still ongoing in the European Union and the United States. The European Medicines Agency [25] and the FDA [15] each released statements in December 2019 to alert the public of their testing efforts, but neither have requested or initiated recalls to date. On February 3, 2020, the FDA released lab results for products from seven companies and sixteen lots of metformin showing levels of NDMA below the FDA acceptable limit [19]. Notably, the FDA may acquire drug or medication samples for analysis through voluntary submission by, or seizure from, specific labeling or manufacturing companies, which can generate sampling bias [26, 27]. On March 2, 2020, an FDA citizen petition was filed by Valisure, LLC which contained lab results for twenty-two companies and thirty-eight lots of metformin showing 42% of lots contained NDMA in excess of the FDA’s daily acceptable intake limit of 96 ng [28]. Valisure acquired its samples through its licensed pharmacy that purchased the metformin from United States-based distributors. Although this approach may reduce selection bias, it is still limited to the available products from a few specific distributors in a short period of time. To further assess the quality of metformin and reduce selection bias as much as possible, Valisure crowdsourced samples of metformin direct from individuals in many states within the United States. The availability of testing was publicized through social media channels like Facebook and Twitter, through consumer advocate networks like The People’s Pharmacy, and other means. The testing program was open to people in all states except Massachusetts and Virginia due to restrictions, and individuals whose medications were paid for by government funded healthcare programs. The high levels of NDMA contamination found through this testing program underscore the need for immediate product recalls and a much broader investigation of metformin manufacturing practices. ## Materials and Methods > In February 2020, FDA published a method titled “Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) Method for the Determination of NDMA in Metformin Drug Substance and Drug Product” [29]. Following the method testing principle, a modified method was validated in Valisure’s ISO 17025 accredited analytical laboratory to achieve a lower limit of quantification (LOQ) and inclusion of a method for limiting the potential for analytical artifacts originating from different inactive ingredients present in different formulations of metformin tablets made by different companies [30]. ### Metformin Drug Product Sampling > Metformin drug product samples were crowdsourced from individuals in the United States except Massachusetts and Virginia due to those states’ restrictions. Patients on government insurance programs were also excluded. Samples of two tablets per medication lot were collected and one was analyzed during a five-month period spanning December 2019 to May 2020. 12 samples were collected from December 2019 to February 2020 and 116 were collected from March 2020 to May 2020. Accepting two tablets was preferable to one to mitigate against the potential of loss of one tablet. Participating individuals used Valisure’s sampling and shipping materials for sample collection and shipping. These sampling and shipping materials have been previously certified to contain no nitrosamine contaminants. The National Drug Code (NDC) of metformin drug product samples was determined by visual inspection of unique tablet imprints and referencing the drugs.com database. The cities and states where the samples were purchased were reported by those who volunteered samples for this study > > The formulation and current approval status for all samples was cross-referenced using the FDA Orange Book [31] and National Drug Code Directory [32]. ### Equipment, Supplies, and Chemicals > SCIEX EXIONLC AD high performance liquid chromatography coupled with SCIEX X500R time of flight high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-QToF HRMS) were purchased from SCIEX (Framingham, MA). Luna Omega PS C18 HPLC column (3 µm, 4.6 × 100 mm) was purchased from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA). Certified reference material of NDMA, NDEA, N-Nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA), and NMBA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). N-ethyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine (NEIPA) and N-Nitrosodiisoporpylamine (NDIPA) were custom made and certified by Enamine (Monmouth Jct., NJ). Isotopic labeled NDMA standard 13C2-D6-NDMA was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Tewksbury, MA). All other chemicals and reagents were ACS or HPLC grade from Sigma-Aldrich. ### Sample Preparation > An entire single metformin tablet was used for sample preparation. One metformin tablet was weighed in a polypropylene tube and methanol was added at approximately 25 mg API/mL. The sample was then homogenized, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 minute. The supernatant was filtered through 0.2 µm nylon filter. A known amount of 13C2-D6-NDMA was spiked into the sample in the LC vial targeting the final internal standard concentration of 40 ng/mL. The sample was then ready for instrumental analysis. ### Instrumental Analysis > NDMA in metformin was determined by LC-HRMS, detailed in Valisure’s FDA Citizen Petition on Metformin [30]. Briefly, 10 µL of sample extract was injected, and chromatographic separation started at gradient of 97.5% of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and 2.5% of mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol) at 0.3 mL/min and was held for 2 minutes. Mobile phase B ramped up to 50 % at 7 minutes and the flow rate was increased to 0.75 mL/min, followed by B ramped up to 97.5 % at 12 minutes and was held for 0.9 minute. Then mobile phase B ramped down to 2.5 % and was held to 15 minutes. NDMA elutes at 7.48 minutes. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mode (APCI+) was selected to ionize NDMA and its isotopic labeled internal standard. Mass identification for NDMA was done by detecting the accurate mass of [M+1]+ in MRMHR acquisition mode for NDMA 75.0553 > 75.0553, and 13C2-D6-NDMA 83.0997 > 83.0997, respectively. The mass accuracy was set at 15 parts per million (ppm) and mass resolution was greater than 25,000. Accurate masses of NMBA, NDEA, NDBA, NEIPA, and NDIPA were also monitored in the sample analysis. ### Quality Assurance and Quality Control > Linear calibration curve was established by a nine-point calibration ranging from 0.3 to 200 ng/mL containing the same internal standard concentration as samples. Calibration is accepted if the r2 is equal or greater than 0.99. The limit of quantification (LOQ) is defined as the lowest acceptable calibration point. The lowest calibration point must have a minimum signal to noise ratio of 10. Concentrations of NDMA in samples were quantified by the internal standard method. Quality Control (QC) samples at low, medium, and high concentrations were analyzed by the same analytical procedure as metformin samples. The LOQ was 0.3 ng/mL for NDMA. ### Data Analysis > NDMA levels were scaled according to the common number of tablets taken per day at the recommended maximum adult daily dose of 2000 mg (see Table 1) [33]. ## Results 128 samples reportedly purchased in 30 states make up this data set (see Table 1). Limit of quantification varied according to tablet weight but was between 7 to 15 ng per sample for all nitrosamines tested. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.22.20110635/T1) Table 1. Information and composition of crowdsourced samples tested. The Tablet Scaling Factor is the maximum number of tablets commonly taken per day. No samples analyzed had detectable levels of the nitrosamines NMBA, NDEA, NEIPA, NDIPA, or NDBA. NDMA levels varied widely across samples (see Figure 1). ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.22.20110635/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.22.20110635/F1) Figure 1. Study samples organized by labeling company and showing the number (n) of samples analyzed. For labeling companies where one or more samples contained detectable levels of NDMA, the average of the samples with NDMA detected are shown in maximum tablet dose equivalent, along with the standard deviation, if applicable. 42% of samples had detectable levels of NDMA. When scaled to the maximum adult tablet dosage equivalent, 36% of samples had NDMA levels that exceed the acceptable daily intake. Detection of high levels of NDMA trends with labeling company and Approved New Drug Application codes (ANDA) (see Figure 2). There are a few examples of specific lablers with multiple ANDAs where samples from one ANDA had detectable NDMA levels and samples from another ANDA did not. There are also examples of specific ANDAs where a few labelers use the same ANDA with some showing detectable NDMA levels and others not. ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.22.20110635/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.22.20110635/F2) Figure 2. Unique formulations for metformin drug products are organized by ANDA codes and labeling company. For labeling companies where one or more samples contained detectable levels of NDMA, the average of the samples with NDMA detected at maximum daily tablet dose are shown as blue bars. Lines without blue bars did not have samples with detectable levels of NDMA. Alternating grey and white blocks are used to group identical ANDA codes used by different labeling companies. ## Discussion and Conclusions Quantitative NDMA testing reported here for 128 crowdsourced metformin drug products suggest strong correlation between drug quality and specific National Drug Codes (NDC), which are tied to the company that labels the product for sale in the United States. Of greatest concern are labeling companies with high NDMA levels that exceed the acceptable daily intake limit established by the FDA. The exposure to NDMA is compounded by the fact that metformin often treats chronic diseases, and as a result, the cumulative exposure to this contamination for many patients is likely occurring for many years. Although there appear to be some trends for specific ANDAs and labeling companies, the overall dispersed nature of contamination suggests complexity in the source of the NDMA. The results reported here are derived from sampling of a limited cross section of crowdsourced on-market products. Importantly, medications purchased by the government (e.g., Department of Defense, Veterans Health Administration, etc) and dispensed by federal pharmacies may have different purchasing agreements for metformin compared to civilian pharmacies. A phone survey to four federal pharmacies to inquire about the labelers of their current stocks of metformin revealed five companies contained in this study and one not represented in this study, data not shown. Therefore, it is plausible that individuals receiving medications from government sources experience similar contamination issues, but further research is necessary. Single tablet analysis employed in this study does not provide statistical significance for nitrosamine content results at the lot level or for some NDCs. Only two tablets were requested from each individual to minimize impact on patients’ medication regimen. Importantly, 36% of samples had NDMA levels that exceeded the acceptable daily dose at maximum dosage units per day. This finding is consistent with data from Valisure’s FDA Citizen Petition on Metformin [30] reporting 42% for the same metric for lots tested in triplicate. The distribution of the limited tested products in this study is unable to fully predict the prevalence of product formulations or NDCs that are on market in the US. Rarer drug products containing metformin were predictably absent from this study. For example, 750 and 850 mg immediate release metformin drug products are not commonly prescribed and were not submitted to this study. Likewise, only two combination products that included metformin were submitted. Less commonly prescribed metformin drug products are of interest since they are likely not manufactured as ubiquitously as 500 and 1000 mg immediate and extended release products. Despite the aforementioned limitations, this novel approach to crowdsource medication samples for contamination analysis may represent the least biased snapshot of post-market drug quality reasonably possible for metformin drug products. The broad distribution of NDMA contamination levels across metformin products warrants further investigation given the possibility for long-term exposure as a maintenance medication. The highest amount of NDMA detected in this study was 1565 ng in a single 500 mg dosage unit (3.13 parts per million API). If four of these tablets are take per day, as is commonly prescribed, the NDMA exposure would be 65-times greater than the acceptable daily intake limit established by the FDA. For the NDCs listed in this study showing high levels of NDMA, further investigation and product recalls are warranted to protect the American public from unnecessary exposure to NDMA. ### Disclosure Valisure LLC is a for-profit analytical pharmacy that batch tests and certifies medications prior to direct sale through online pharmacy. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. ## Data Availability Granular data is available in the supplemental table and further requests may be made to the corresponding author. * Received May 22, 2020. * Revision received May 22, 2020. * Accepted May 26, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Mayo Clinic. Metformin (Oral Route). 2020; Available from: [https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/metformin-oral-route/description/drg-20067074](https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/metformin-oral-route/description/drg-20067074). 2. 2.GoodRx. Metformin vs. Metformin ER: Which One Is Right for Me? 2020; Available from: [https://www.goodrx.com/blog/metformin-vs-extended-release-metformin-pros-cons/](https://www.goodrx.com/blog/metformin-vs-extended-release-metformin-pros-cons/). 3. 3.ClinCalc.com. Metformin Hydrochloride Drug Usage Statistics, United States, 2007 - 2017.; Available from: [https://clincalc.com/DrugStats/Drugs/MetforminHydrochloride](https://clincalc.com/DrugStats/Drugs/MetforminHydrochloride). 4. 4.Beyond diabetes, metformin may prove to be a ‘wonder drug’. 2017. 5. 5.Abdelgadir, E., et al., Effect of Metformin on Different Non-Diabetes Related Conditions, a Special Focus on Malignant Conditions: Review of Literature. J Clin Med Res, 2017. 9(5): p. 388–395. 6. 6.Khokhar, A., et al., Metformin Use in Children and Adolescents with Prediabetes. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2017. 64(6): p. 1341-1353. 7. 7.International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC MONOGRAPHS ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF CARCINOGENIC HAZARDS TO HUMANS. World Health Organization. 8. 8.Lijinsky, W., E. Conrad, and R. Van de Bogart, Carcinogenic nitrosamines formed by drug-nitrite interactions. Nature, 1972. 239(5368): p. 165–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4561964&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F05%2F26%2F2020.05.22.20110635.atom) 9. 9.Lijinsky, W., Reaction of drugs with nitrous acid as a source of carcinogenic nitrosamines. Cancer Res, 1974. 34(1): p. 255–8. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoiY2FucmVzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjM0LzEvMjU1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDUvMjYvMjAyMC4wNS4yMi4yMDExMDYzNS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 10. 10.World Health Organization. WHO Information Note UPDATE ON NITROSAMINE IMPURITIES. 11. 11.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) M7(R1) Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals To Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk Guidance for Industry. 2018. 12. 12.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Laboratory Tests | Metformin. 2020; Available from: [https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/laboratory-tests-metformin](https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/laboratory-tests-metformin). 13. 13.European Pharmacopeia, 2.4.36. N-NITROSAMINES IN ACTIVE SUBSTANCES. Pharmeuropa 32.2. 14. 14.U.S. Pharmacopeia, General Chapter Prospectus: <1469> Nitrosamine Impurities. 15. 15.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Statement from Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, on impurities found in diabetes drugs outside the U.S. 2019. 16. 16.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA Updates and Press Announcements on Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) Recalls (Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan). 2019. 17. 17.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Search List of Recalled Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) including Valsartan, Losartan and Irbesartan. September 2019; Available from: [https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/search-list-recalled-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blockers-arbs-including-valsartan-losartan-and](https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/search-list-recalled-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blockers-arbs-including-valsartan-losartan-and). 18. 18.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA Requests Removal of All Ranitidine Products (Zantac) from the Market. 2020. 19. 19.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA Updates and Press Announcements on NDMA in Metformin. 2020; Available from: [https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-metformin](https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-ndma-metformin). 20. 20.Health Services Authority of Sinapore, HSA Recalls Three out of 46 Metformin Medicines. 2019. 21. 21.Swissmedic, Trace amounts of a nitrosamine impurity found in individual diabetes medicines. 2019. 22. 22.Government of Canada, Health Canada evaluating NDMA in metformin drugs. 2019. Available from: [https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2019/71831a-eng.php](https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2019/71831a-eng.php) 23. 23.Swissmedic, Chargenrückruf—Metformin Streuli, Filmtabletten. 24. 24.Government of Canada, Certain Metformin diabetes drugs recalled due to the presence or possible presence of NDMA. 2020. Available from: [https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2020/72287a-eng.php](https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2020/72287a-eng.php) 25. 25.European Medicines Agency, EMA update on metformin diabetes medicines Share. 2019. 26. 26.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Drug Quality Sampling and Testing Programs. 2020; Available from: [https://www.fda.gov/drugs/science-and-research-drugs/drug-quality-sampling-and-testing-programs](https://www.fda.gov/drugs/science-and-research-drugs/drug-quality-sampling-and-testing-programs). 27. 27.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Regulatory Procedures Manual Chapter 6: JUDICIAL ACTIONS. 2020. 28. 28.Regulations.gov, Valisure Citizen Petition on Metformin. 2020. Available from: [https://beta.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-P-0978-0001](https://beta.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2020-P-0978-0001) 29. 29.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS) Method for the Determination of NDMA in Metformin Drug Substance and Drug Product. 2020. 30. 30.Valisure, Valisure LC-HRMS Method for Determination of NDMA in Metformin. 2020. 31. 31.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. 2020. 32. 32.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Drug Code Directory. 2020. 33. 33.Prescribing Information, Glumetza (metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets). 2011.