Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol to compare the risk of attrition among prenatal vitamin D supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients with its non-recipients

View ORCID ProfileSumanta Saha
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.20110262
Sumanta Saha
1Affiliaton: None
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sumanta Saha
  • For correspondence: sumanta.saha@uq.net.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Aim Recently, several clinical trials have tested the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients and their newborns. However, their participant attrition, an important determinant of the internal validity, remains poorly explored. Therefore, this review protocol is proposed, which aims to compare it between prenatal vitamin D supplemented and not supplemented GDM patients.

Method Randomized clinical trials studying the above will be searched mainly in different electronic databases. It will search for the English language articles irrespective of publication date. Data concerning the reviewed trials’ design, population, interventions, and outcome of interest will be extracted. Subsequently, their risk of bias will be assessed. Outcome data between the interventions will be juxtaposed meta-analytically to estimate the risk ratio. Next, the statistical heterogeneity (by Chi2 and I2 statistics) and publication bias (using funnel plot and Eggers test) among the trials will be evaluated. Subgroup analysis will follow if the heterogeneity is high. Finally, a sensitivity analysis will iterate the meta-analysis using an alternative model and by eliminating a trial every time. Statistical significance will be determined at p<0.05 and 95% CI. All analyses will be done in Stata. If a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative reporting will ensue.

Results The review will follow the PRISMA reporting guideline. Any statistically significant finding’s evidence quality will be graded by the GRADE approach.

Conclusion The proposed review will compare the risk of loss to follow up among GDM patients complemented and not complemented with prenatal vitamin D.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

no funding received

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was not required since do not directly involve human subjects

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

not applicable

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 25, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol to compare the risk of attrition among prenatal vitamin D supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients with its non-recipients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol to compare the risk of attrition among prenatal vitamin D supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients with its non-recipients
Sumanta Saha
medRxiv 2020.05.22.20110262; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.20110262
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol to compare the risk of attrition among prenatal vitamin D supplemented gestational diabetes mellitus patients with its non-recipients
Sumanta Saha
medRxiv 2020.05.22.20110262; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.20110262

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (141)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (408)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (67)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4805)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (177)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (670)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (187)
  • Health Informatics (621)
  • Health Policy (314)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (200)
  • Hematology (84)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5278)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (323)
  • Medical Education (91)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (73)
  • Neurology (677)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (110)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (124)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (437)
  • Ophthalmology (138)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (88)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (127)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (129)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (765)
  • Public and Global Health (1796)
  • Radiology and Imaging (321)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (68)
  • Sports Medicine (61)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)