ABSTRACT
Introduction Problems about reporting of a scientific study can affect dissemination of research in different manners. It is known that study methods are frequently not described in adequate detail and that results are presented ambiguously or selectively. To overcome these problems, reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT, PRISMA, STARD and STROBE statements) have been developed to increase the transparency of research. While recent evidence suggested that these guidelines are frequently used inappropriately in studies published in the major medical journals, the extent and appropriateness of use in physical therapy research has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this meta-research study will be to evaluate the frequency of using reporting guidelines and their appropriate use in physical therapy published research.
Methods and Analysis A cross-sectional analysis is planned on a random sample of 200 studies published in the last ten years (2010-2019) in the five generic rehabilitation journals with the highest 5-year impact factor. Randomization will be stratified for publication date to include an equal number of studies from 2010 to 2014 (n=100), and from 2015 to 2019 (n=100). Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, diagnostic accuracy studies and observational studies will be included. Crude prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals of using and appropriateness of using will be estimated. A bivariate analysis will assess the relationship between the use of reporting guidelines and the year of publication.
Ethics and Dissemination Several studies have shown the positive influence of reporting guidelines on the completeness of research reporting but no one investigated the use and the appropriateness of reporting guidelines in physical therapy research. Therefore, this study will add relevant knowledge that may contribute to improve further the reporting of rehabilitation research. The results of this research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at relevant (inter)national scientific events.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ST7H8
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are presented in manuscript
