Abstract
In the poorly studied field of physician suicide, various fac-tors can contribute to misinformation or information distor-tion, which in turn can influence evidence-based policies and prevention of suicide in this unique population. Here, we report on the use of nanopublications as a scientific publishing approach to establish a citation network of claims drawn from a variety of media concerning the rate of suicide of US physicians. Our work integrates these vari-ous claims and enables the verification of non-authoritative assertions, thereby better equipping researchers and to advance evidence-based knowledge and make informed statements in the advocacy of physician suicide prevention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data curated and used for this study are available online.
