ABSTRACT
Background Sideline assessment of football players with a potential concussion is a challenging concern. Video analysis is an important tool to recognize traumatic brain injury (TBI), including sports-related concussions, among football players.
Aim To report the characteristics of TBI among football players in 2017 Brazilian Series A Football Championship and to discuss the evaluation protocols of football players with concussion.
Methods This is an observational study concerning video analysis of all matches on 2017 Series A Brazilian Football Championship. The videos were first analyzed by a team of 10 trained medical students. All suspected TBIs were reviewed by the research’s coordinator. Concussion diagnosis was defined by one of the following events: lying motionless, loss of responsiveness, impact seizure, disorientation and motor incoordination. The length of sideline medical assessment was systematically recorded.
Results In a whole of 380 matches, it was verified 374 TBIs. The most common etiology was “head-to-head” impact. Twelve players were replaced after TBI. Thirteen players (3,5% of TBIs) had concussion, but only four of them were replaced. The overall mean time for medical assessment was 1’35” (range: 48” to 7’40”). Considering the twelve players who had a concussion and the thirteen players who were replaced, the mean time for medical evaluation was 3’19” and 3’26”, respectively.
Conclusion This study confirms that there is a gap between formal protocols for concussion assessment on sideline in Brazilian Elite Football and current medical practices. It also discusses changes on football rules of player replacement to an adequate sideline medical evaluation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is an observational study
Funding Statement
No funding was received.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This is an observational study and all collected data from video analysis were systematically filled and are available with the research coordinator.