Abstract
Problem definition Turn raw data from Electronic Health Records into accurate predictions on patient flows and inform daily decision-making at a major hospital.
Practical Relevance In a hospital environment under increasing financial and operational stress, forecasts on patient demand patterns could help match capacity and demand and improve hospital operations.
Methodology We use data from 63, 432 admissions at a large academic hospital (50.0% female, median age 64 years old, median length-of-stay 3.12 days). We construct an expertise-driven patient representation on top of their EHR data and apply a broad class of machine learning methods to predict several aspects of patient flows.
Results With a unique patient representation, we estimate short-term discharges, identify long-stay patients, predict discharge destination and anticipate flows in and out of intensive care units with accuracy in the 80%+ range. More importantly, we implement this machine learning pipeline into the EHR system of the hospital and construct prediction-informed dashboards to support daily bed placement decisions.
Managerial Implications Our study demonstrates that interpretable machine learning techniques combined with EHR data can be used to provide visibility on patient flows. Our approach provides an alternative to deep learning techniques which is equally accurate, interpretable, frugal in data and computational power, and production-ready.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received to conduct the study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional review board at BIDMC approved the study with waiver of informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author affiliations updated Empirical evaluation in Section 4.3 more robust and more clearly reported
↵3 Note that this is not the convention used by the commercial implementation of Optimal Classification Trees (Interpretable AI 2020). As depicted in Figures 1-2, they choose t equal to empirical proportion of positive cases on the training population.
Data Availability
Data is not available
