Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Upper limb rehabilitation in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD): a patients’ perspective

R Kulshrestha, A Faux-Nightingale, N Emery, T. Willis, View ORCID ProfileF Philp
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.20097022
R Kulshrestha
1Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (RJAH) Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Faux-Nightingale
2School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, ST5 5BG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Emery
1Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (RJAH) Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Willis
1Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (RJAH) Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F Philp
3School of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, ST5 5BG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F Philp
  • For correspondence: f.d.philp{at}keele.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to identify exercise programmes used by Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) patients in the community, along with barriers and perceptions.

Methods A web based survey, distributed to patients on the UK FSHD registry, and focus groups were conducted. Thematic analysis was conducted on answers to survey questions supported by focus group notes, from seven FSHD patients.

Results A response rate of 43.6% was achieved with 232 out of 532 patients completing the survey. Only 44.4% engaged with exercises targeting the upper body. The themes from the data were: 1) Understanding of disease mechanism shaping exercise choice 2) Lack of understanding about the condition and how exercise interacts with it 3) Support from professionals 4) Barriers to exercise and 5) Thoughts about future research.

Conclusion Exercise selection was variable amongst FSHD patients. Lack of information, pain, fatigue, availability and access to facilities, cost and time were identified as barriers to exercise. Participants (92.2%) agreed additional research into upper limb exercises is needed and felt a 3-month arm cycling intervention with monthly clinical visits and MRI imaging would be appropriate. Further research is needed to develop evidence based exercise interventions and guidance for upper limb exercise prescription in FSHD.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Funding for the Patient Involvement focus group was received from the NIHR RDS West Midlands – RDS1606

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are available on request

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 19, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Upper limb rehabilitation in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD): a patients’ perspective
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Upper limb rehabilitation in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD): a patients’ perspective
R Kulshrestha, A Faux-Nightingale, N Emery, T. Willis, F Philp
medRxiv 2020.05.11.20097022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.20097022
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Upper limb rehabilitation in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD): a patients’ perspective
R Kulshrestha, A Faux-Nightingale, N Emery, T. Willis, F Philp
medRxiv 2020.05.11.20097022; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.20097022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (428)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3286)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (276)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1168)
  • Epidemiology (13349)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5140)
  • Geriatric Medicine (481)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3261)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1015)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14618)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4914)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (880)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2517)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (555)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4198)
  • Public and Global Health (7489)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1703)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (496)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (204)