Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test for assessment of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based setting in Brazil

View ORCID ProfileLucia Campos Pellanda, Eliana Márcia da Ros Wendland, Alan John Alexander McBride, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira, Odir Antônio Dellagostin, View ORCID ProfileMariangela Freitas da Silveira, View ORCID ProfileAluisio Jardim Dornellas de Barros, View ORCID ProfilePedro Curi Hallal, View ORCID ProfileCesar Gomes Victora
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.20093476
Lucia Campos Pellanda
1Community Health Department, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lucia Campos Pellanda
  • For correspondence: pellanda@ufcspa.edu.br
Eliana Márcia da Ros Wendland
1Community Health Department, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan John Alexander McBride
2Biotechnology Department, Centre for Technological Development, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues
3Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira
2Biotechnology Department, Centre for Technological Development, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Odir Antônio Dellagostin
2Biotechnology Department, Centre for Technological Development, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariangela Freitas da Silveira
3Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mariangela Freitas da Silveira
Aluisio Jardim Dornellas de Barros
3Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aluisio Jardim Dornellas de Barros
Pedro Curi Hallal
3Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pedro Curi Hallal
Cesar Gomes Victora
3Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cesar Gomes Victora
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background While the recommended laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 is a molecular based assay, population-based studies to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 usually use serological assays.

Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid diagnostic test for COVID-19 compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

Methods We evaluated the sensitivity using a panel of finger prick blood samples from participants >18 years of age that had been tested for COVID-19 by qRT-PCR. For assessing specificity, we used serum samples from the 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort participants collected in 2012 with no exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Results The sensitivity of the test was 77.1% (95% CI 66.6 - 85.6), based upon 83 subjects who had tested positive for qRT-PCR at least 10 days before the rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Based upon 100 sera samples, specificity was 98.0% (95% CI 92.9 - 99.8). There was substantial agreement (Kappa score 0.76) between the qRT-PCR results and the RDT.

Interpretation The validation results are well in line with previous assessments of the test, and confirm that it is sufficiently precise for epidemiological studies aimed at monitoring levels and trends of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Observational study

Funding Statement

This work started through the Data Committee created by the State of Rio Grande do Sul government to fight the COVID-19 pandemics. The tests used in the study have been provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Financial support for for data collection was provided by UNIMED Porto Alegre, Instituto Cultural Floresta and Instituto Serrapilheira. None of these funding sources took any part in study conceptualization, data collection, analysis or manuscript preparation, reviewing, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Due to the sensitive nature of the questions asked in this study, survey respondents were assured raw data would remain confidential and would not be shared. Data not available / The data that has been used is confidential

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 10, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test for assessment of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based setting in Brazil
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test for assessment of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based setting in Brazil
Lucia Campos Pellanda, Eliana Márcia da Ros Wendland, Alan John Alexander McBride, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira, Odir Antônio Dellagostin, Mariangela Freitas da Silveira, Aluisio Jardim Dornellas de Barros, Pedro Curi Hallal, Cesar Gomes Victora
medRxiv 2020.05.06.20093476; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.20093476
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test for assessment of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in a community-based setting in Brazil
Lucia Campos Pellanda, Eliana Márcia da Ros Wendland, Alan John Alexander McBride, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira, Odir Antônio Dellagostin, Mariangela Freitas da Silveira, Aluisio Jardim Dornellas de Barros, Pedro Curi Hallal, Cesar Gomes Victora
medRxiv 2020.05.06.20093476; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.20093476

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (134)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1747)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (653)
  • Epidemiology (10779)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (583)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2933)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1918)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12496)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (321)
  • Neurology (2780)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1454)
  • Ophthalmology (440)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (379)
  • Pediatrics (864)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
  • Primary Care Research (333)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2630)
  • Public and Global Health (5338)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1002)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (594)
  • Respiratory Medicine (722)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)