Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Are Vapers More Susceptible to COVID-19 Infection?

View ORCID ProfileDongmei Li, View ORCID ProfileDaniel P. Croft, View ORCID ProfileDeborah J. Ossip, View ORCID ProfileZidian Xie
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20092379
Dongmei Li
1Department of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dongmei Li
  • For correspondence: Dongmei_Li@urmc.rochester.edu
Daniel P. Croft
2Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel P. Croft
Deborah J. Ossip
3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deborah J. Ossip
Zidian Xie
1Department of Clinical & Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zidian Xie
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a global pandemic in March 2020. Electronic cigarette use (vaping) rapidly gained popularity in the US in recent years. Whether electronic cigarette users (vapers) are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection is unknown.

Methods Using integrated data in each US state from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), United States Census Bureau and the 1Point3Acres.com website, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with negative binomial distribution assumption and log link functions were used to examine the association of weighted proportions of vapers with number of COVID-19 infections and deaths in the US.

Results The weighted proportion of vapers who used e-cigarettes every day or some days ranged from 2.86% to 6.42% for US states. Statistically significant associations were observed between the weighted proportion of vapers and number of COVID-19 infected cases as well as COVID-19 deaths in the US after adjusting for the weighted proportion of smokers and other significant covariates in the GEE models. With every one percent increase in weighted proportion of vapers in each state, the number of COVID-19 infected cases increase by 0.3139 (95% CI: 0.0554 –0.5723) and the number of COVID-19 deaths increase by 0.3705 (95% CI: 0.0623 – 0.6786) in log scale in each US state.

Conclusions The positive associations between the proportion of vapers and the number of COVID-19 infected cases and deaths in each US state suggest an increased susceptibility of vapers to COVID-19 infections and deaths.

Introduction

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. 1 As of April 28, 2020, there were over three million COVID-19 infected cases and over 200,000 deaths globally. 2 In the United State, the total number of infected COVID-19 cases exceeded one million, with over 57,000 deaths reported by April 28, 2020. COVID-19 infection presents with cough, dyspnea and fever among other systemic symptoms and can lead to pneumonia and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. 3

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), promoted as an alternative for cigarette smoking, rapidly gained popularity in recent years in the US. In 2018, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use (vaping) in US adults was 3.2%. 4 Recent studies on the associations of vaping and health symptoms/diseases have observed associations between vaping and symptoms of wheezing and self-reported Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), along with increased inflammation in bronchial epithelial cells and alterations in the pulmonary immune response to infection. 5-10 Tobacco control researchers have raised concerns that vapers may be more susceptible to COVID-19 infections and could develop more severe COVID-19 symptoms. 11 However, there is very limited evidence on the association between vaping and COVID-19 infection.

We will examine the association of vaping with COVID-19 infections and deaths, using the integrated state-level weighted proportions of current e-cigarette users (vapers) from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data, the population size and land area in 2018 in each state from United States Census Bureau, and the daily number of COVID-19 infected cases and deaths in each state from the 1Point3Acres.com website during the time period from January 21, 2020 to April 25, 2020 in the United States. Our study is the first one to provide evidence on the association of vaping with COVID-19 infections and deaths at the US population level.

Methods

Study Population

We integrated the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data at state level, the population size and land area in each state from the United States Census Bureau, and the COVID-19 infected cases and deaths data from the 1Point3Acres.com website at available dates from each state through the unique two letter state abbreviations. From the 2018 BRFSS survey, 34 states provided information on the vaping status variable. The population size in each state in 2018 and land area in each state were obtained from the United States Census Bureau website. The COVID-19 infected cases and deaths counts were available for each state from January 21, 2020 to April 25, 2020. Reports of negative numbers of infected cases and deaths were excluded from the COVID-19 data. After integrating the BRFSS data and the census data with the COVID-19 infected case and deaths from different dates at the state level, there were 1607 observations in the final analysis data.

Vaping Status

The vaping status variable was defined by the answers to the question “Do you now use e-cigarettes, every day, some days, or not at all?” in the 2018 BRFSS survey. Subjects who now use e-cigarettes every day or some days were classified as vapers and subjects who responded that they use e-cigarettes “not at all” or “not applicable” were classified as non-vapers. The weighted frequency of vapers in each state was obtained using the proc surveyfreq procedure in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), considering the complex sampling design of the BRFSS survey. The weighted proportion of vapers in each US state was calculated using the ratio of weighted frequency of vapers and weighted frequency of total number of subjects in each state.

Outcomes and Covariates

The outcomes used in current analysis are the number of COVID-19 infected cases and deaths. Covariates considered in the current investigation include population size, population density (calculated using population size divided by land area), age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, income, mental health, physical health, obesity, respiratory disease (including asthma and COPD), heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, kidney disease, and smoking (currently smoke every day or some days). The number of COVID-19 infected cases was also used as a covariate when modeling the COVID-19 deaths.

Statistical Analysis

Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with negative binomial distribution assumptions and log link functions were used to examine the association of weighted proportion of vapers with the number of COVID-19 infections and deaths, after adjusting for the confounding effects from significant covariates. 12,13 The correlations of number of COVID-19 infections and deaths from different dates within the same state were considered through the autoregressive 1 (AR (1)) variance-covariance structure within the GEE model framework. The purposeful covariates selection method was used to select significant covariates for the GEE models. 14 Variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to examine the multicollinearities among the predictor variables in the GEE models. 15 A VIF value of five or less was considered to indicate multicollinearity in the fitted GEE model. All statistical analyses were conducted using statistical analysis software SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and R (R Core Team, 2017). Significance levels for all tests were set at 5% for two-sided tests.

Results

The weighted proportion of vapers ranged from 2.86% to 6.42% for US states. The daily number of infected COVID-19 cases ranged from 0 to 11,743 with an average of 362 daily cases across all states in the US during the time period from January 21, 2002 to April 25, 2020. During the same time period, the daily number of deaths ranged from 0 to 4,556 with the mean number of daily deaths at 20 across all US states.

Figure 1 shows the estimated coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals from the GEE model on daily number of COVID-19 infected cases. States that had a higher proportion of vapers also had a larger number of daily COVID-19 infected cases. For every one percent increase in the proportion of vapers, the log number of daily COVID-19 infected cases increased by 0.3139 (95% CI: 0.0554 – 0.5723) on average. The covariates included in the GEE model were state population size in log scale, male, less than high school education, poor physical health, cancer, obese, and smoker. Both population size in log scale in each state and proportion of less than high school education had a positive association with the daily COVID-19 infection. Male gender, poor physical health, cancer, and obesity had a negative association with the daily COVID-19 infection. Proportion of current smokers in each state was not significantly associated with the daily COVID-19 infected cases in each state.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Adjusted estimated coefficients from the GEE model on number of COVID-19 infected cases.

The estimated coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals from the GEE model on daily number of COVID-19 deaths were shown in Figure 2. States that had a higher proportion of vapers also had a higher number of daily COVID-19 deaths. With a one percent increase in the proportion of vapers, the log number of COVID-19 deaths will increase 0.3705 (95% CI: 0.0623 – 0.6786) on average. The covariates in the GEE model included the number of daily confirmed cases in each state, state population size in log scale, proportion of people aged 35-44, proportion of White, Black, and Hispanic, proportion of people having respiratory disease, cancer, being obese, and being smokers. Daily confirmed cases, state population size in log scale, proportion of White, Black, and Hispanic, and proportion of people having respiratory disease were positively associated with the daily number of COVID-19 deaths in each state. The proportion of people aged 35-44, having cancer, and being obese all were negatively associated with daily number of COVID-19 deaths in each state. Similarly, the proportion of current smokers in each state was not significantly associated with the daily number of COVID-19 deaths in each state.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Adjusted estimated coefficients from the GEE model on number of COVID-19 deaths.

Discussion

Using integrated state level data obtained from the 2018 BRFSS survey, the United States Census Bureau and the 1Point3Acres.com website, we were able to investigate the association of weighted proportion of vapers with COVID-19 infected cases and deaths in the United States. We found a significant positive association of vaping with COVID-19 infections and deaths at the state level controlling for sociodemographic and health related covariates. This finding further supports future research into the potential susceptibility of vapers to COVID-19 infection. Additional findings include the expected positive association between population size and COVID-19 infection and death. Finally we also observed a positive association between a low education level and COVID-19 infection.

Though we identified a positive association between the weighted proportion of vapers and the number of COVID-19 infections and deaths at state level, we did not have data on what proportion of those who actually contracted COVID-19 or died from COVID-19 were vapers. Thus, we cannot determine causality between vaping and COVID-19 infections and deaths. However, prior research supports the biological plausibility of a relationship between vaping and an increased susceptibility to respiratory infection. 16 Multiple mouse models have observed an increased severity in infection associated with vaping exposure related to dysregulation of lung epithelial cells and an impaired immune response to both viral17, and bacterial infection. 18 Bacterial superinfection of viral illnesses like influenza and COVID-19 is especially dangerous, as this leads to an increased severity in illness 19 A human cell based model of exposure to nicotine-free flavored e-liquid observed immunosuppressive effects and impaired respiratory innate immune cell function (alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer cells).20 In humans, bronchoalveolar lavage samples from the airways of active vapers also revealed dysregulation of the airway’s innate immune response including neutrophilic response and mucin 21 A wide variety of flavorings are used by vapers, many of which, such as diacetyl, acetoin, pentanedione, o-vanillin, maltol, and coumarin in nicotine-free e-liquid, could also trigger inflammatory responses in human monocytes.7 Finally, previous human studies found vaping is associated with increased risk of chronic bronchitic symptoms (chronic cough, phlegm, or bronchitis).22-24 and epidemiologic studies observed an increased risk of self-reported wheezing and COPD. 9,10 With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, particular health concerns have been raised regarding vaping, such as whether vapers have higher risk for COVID-19 infection and could develop more severe symptoms once contracted COVID-19.11 To our best knowledge, this is the first population-based study to empirically examine and find an association between vaping and COVID-19.

The existing literature on the increased risk of respiratory infection in combustible cigarette smokers was summarized by a prior meta-analysis finding an increased risk of current smokers for influenza infection compared to non-smokers.25 As COVID-19 is a novel condition, the literature examining the risk of smokers for COVID-19 is scant. A recent study based on 1099 COVID-19 patients found smoking history was associated with COVID-19 severity.26 A recent systematic review on COVID-19 and smoking concludes that smoking is likely associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19.27 However, other studies indicate that smoking might not be associated with the incidence and severity of COVID-19 28, for example, a recent meta-analysis based on Chinese patients suggests that active smoking is not associated with severity of COVID-19.29 It remains unclear whether nicotine has a role in the either the increased or decreased severity of illness for smokers with COVID-19. Our study did not find a significant association between the weighted proportion of smokers and the number of COVID-19 infections and deaths at state level. Due to the incomplete testing and tracking of home deaths, it is possible that a percentage of older smokers with comorbidities are dying at home from COVID-19 and therefore are not captured into the reported COVID-19 infections and death data 30,31 Another possibility is that smokers with comorbidities are homebound and more likely to be strictly following social/physical distancing guidelines, and are therefore reducing their risk for COVID-19. Currently, there is limited evidence on the susceptibility of smokers to COVID-19 infection and whether smokers have a worsened course in the setting of COVID-19. Additionally, it is unknown whether or not COVID-19 virus could be transmitted to those surrounding smokers through passive smoking and vaping. More epidemiological and clinical studies are needed to investigate the association of smoking with COVID-19 infections and deaths.

We found states that had a larger weighted proportion of subjects who had less than high school education had a higher number of COVID-19 infections. Researchers from the University of Southern California found that Americans who had less than high school education had a lower perceived risk of exposure to COVID-19 and a higher perceived risk of deaths than those who have college or higher degrees. 32 This might explain, in part, the positive association between the weighted proportion of less than high school education with the number of COVID-19 infections. We also found states that had a larger proportion of non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics had a larger number of COVID-19 deaths. The COVID-19 deaths rate data from Washington D.C. and 36 US states reported through April 27, 2020 showed that non-Hispanic Blacks (28.4%) and Hispanics (11.3%) had the highest COVID-19 deaths rate. 33 This could be related to the higher proportion of chronic conditions such as hypertension, heart disease and diabetes in non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics.34,35 We also found that states having a higher proportion of respiratory disease such as asthma or COPD had a higher number of COVID-19 deaths, which indicated that respiratory disease such as asthma and COPD could potentially increase the risk of COVID-19 deaths.

There are several limitations in current study. One limitation is that the weighted proportions of vapers, smokers, and other demographic and chronic diseases are from the 2018 BRFSS data, which might differ from the 2020 estimates. The reported COVID-19 infected cases and deaths obtained from 1Point3Acres.com website could be subject to some reporting errors as we noticed some negative number of COVID-19 infected cases and deaths, which we excluded from further analysis. However, we compared the COVID-19 data obtained from 1Point3Acres.com website with the COVID-19 data from the New York Times 36 and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website 37 and found consistent numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths, which increased the robustness and reliability of the data sources. Another limitation is that our current analysis is on state level instead of individual level. We don’t know the individual status of vaping and COVID-19 infections or deaths, thus estimated coefficients of association could be different from epidemiological or clinical studies on individual subjects.

Conclusions

There are positive associations between the weighted proportion of vapers in each US state and the daily number of COVID-19 infections and deaths in each US state. These positive associations suggest vapers may have an increased susceptibility to COVID-19 infections and deaths. Systematic assessment of vaping among patients, along with additional studies on the associations of vaping with COVID-19 infections and deaths at individual level are needed to confirm the identified positive association between vaping and COVID-19 infections and deaths.

Data Availability

The 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data are publicly available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html). The state population in 2018 and the land area in each state were obtained from the United States Census Bureau website (https://www.census.gov/). The COVID-19 infected cases and deaths data were requested and obtained from the 1Point3Acres.com website (https://coronavirus.1point3acres.com/en).

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html

https://www.census.gov/

https://coronavirus.1point3acres.com/en

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products under Award Number U54CA228110. DL’s time is supported in part by the University of Rochester CTSA award number UL1 TR002001 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.

Contributors

DL, ZX: conceived and designed the study. DL: analyzed the data. DL wrote the manuscript.

DL, DC, DO, ZX: assisted with interpretation of analyses and edited the manuscript.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the FDA.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data sharing statement

The 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data are publicly available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html). The state population in 2018 and the land area in each state were obtained from the United States Census Bureau website (https://www.census.gov/). The COVID-19 infected cases and deaths data were requested and obtained from the 1Point3Acres.com website (https://coronavirus.1point3acres.com/en).

What this paper adds

  • Current e-cigarette use is positively associated with COVID-19 infections.

  • Current e-cigarette use is positively associated with COVID-19 deaths.

  • This study emphasizes the importance of studying the susceptibility of current e-cigarette users to COVID-19 infection and death.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020.
  3. 3.↵
    Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, et al. Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;30(3):313–324.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Dai HY, Leventhal AM. Prevalence of e-Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States, 2014–2018. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2019;322(18):1824–1827.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Gaurav R. Vaping Away Epithelial Integrity. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;61(2): 127–129.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.
    Gilpin DF, McGown KA, Gallagher K, et al. Electronic cigarette vapour increases virulence and inflammatory potential of respiratory pathogens. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):267.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Muthumalage T, Lamb T, Friedman MR, Rahman I. E-cigarette flavored pods induce inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and DNA damage in lung epithelial cells and monocytes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19035.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.
    Wu Q, Jiang D, Minor M, Chu HW. Electronic cigarette liquid increases inflammation and virus infection in primary human airway epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Li D, Sundar IK, McIntosh S, et al. Association of smoking and electronic cigarette use with wheezing and related respiratory symptoms in adults: cross-sectional results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, wave 2. Tob Control. 2020;29(2): 140-147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Xie Z, Ossip DJ, Rahman I, Li D. Use of Electronic Cigarettes and Self-Reported Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diagnosis in Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;ntz234.
  11. 11.↵
    Majmundar A, Allem JP, Cruz TB, Unger JB. Public health concerns and unsubstantiated claims at the intersection of vaping and COVID-19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020.
  12. 12.↵
    Johnson TR, Kim JS. A generalized estimating equations approach to mixed-effects ordinal probit models. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004;57(Pt 2):295–310.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Vagenas D, Totsika V. Modelling correlated data: Multilevel models and generalized estimating equations and their use with data from research in developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;81:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Lambrinos J. Applied Linear-Regression Models - Neter, J, Wasserman, W, Kutner, Mh. Technometrics. 1984;26(4):415–416.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    In: Eaton DL, Kwan LY, Stratton K, eds. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. Washington (DC) 2018.
  17. 17.↵
    Madison MC, Landers CT, Gu BH, et al. Electronic cigarettes disrupt lung lipid homeostasis and innate immunity independent of nicotine. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(10):4290–4304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Hwang JH, Lyes M, Sladewski K, et al. Electronic cigarette inhalation alters innate immunity and airway cytokines while increasing the virulence of colonizing bacteria. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016;94(6):667–679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Rynda-Apple A, Robinson KM, Alcorn JF. Influenza and Bacterial Superinfection: Illuminating the Immunologic Mechanisms of Disease. Infect Immun. 2015;83(10):3764–3770.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Clapp PW, Pawlak EA, Lackey JT, et al. Flavored e-cigarette liquids and cinnamaldehyde impair respiratory innate immune cell function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017;313(2):L278-L292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Reidel B, Radicioni G, Clapp PW, et al. E-Cigarette Use Causes a Unique Innate Immune Response in the Lung, Involving Increased Neutrophilic Activation and Altered Mucin Secretion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(4):492–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Gotts JE, Jordt SE, McConnell R, Tarran R. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes? BMJ. 2019;366:l5275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    Wang MP, Ho SY, Leung LT, Lam TH. Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(1):89–91.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    McConnell R, Barrington-Trimis JL, Wang K, et al. Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(8):1043–1049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Lawrence H, Hunter A, Murray R, Lim WS, McKeever T. Cigarette smoking and the occurrence of influenza - Systematic review. J Infect. 2019;79(5):401–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Vardavas CI, Nikitara K. COVID-19 and smoking: A systematic review of the evidence. Tob Induc Dis. 2020; 18: 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Cai H. Sex difference and smoking predisposition in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e20.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Lippi G, Henry BM. Active smoking is not associated with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Eur J Intern Med. 2020;75:107–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Appleby J. What is happening to non-covid deaths. BMJ. 2020;369:m1607.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Simons D, Shahab L, Brown J, Perski O. The association of smoking status with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalisation and mortality from COVID-19: A living rapid evidence review. Qeios. 2020.
  32. 32.↵
    https://healthpolicy.usc.edu/evidence-base/individuals-with-low-incomes-less-education-report-higher-perceived-financial-health-threats-from-covid-19/.
  33. 33.↵
    https://www.apmresearchlab.org/covid/deaths-by-race.
  34. 34.↵
    Al Kibria GM. Racial/ethnic disparities in prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension among US adults following application of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline. Prev Med Rep. 2019;14:100850.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Al Kibria GM, Nemirovsky A, Sharmeen A, Day B. Age-stratified prevalence, treatment status, and associated factors of hypertension among US adults following application of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline. Hypertens Res. 2019;42(10):1631–1643.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data.
  37. 37.↵
    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/previouscases.html.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 09, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Vapers More Susceptible to COVID-19 Infection?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Are Vapers More Susceptible to COVID-19 Infection?
Dongmei Li, Daniel P. Croft, Deborah J. Ossip, Zidian Xie
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20092379; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20092379
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Are Vapers More Susceptible to COVID-19 Infection?
Dongmei Li, Daniel P. Croft, Deborah J. Ossip, Zidian Xie
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20092379; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20092379

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (452)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (158)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5268)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (196)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (699)
  • Health Policy (360)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (164)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5889)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (767)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (131)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (143)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (480)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (98)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (864)
  • Public and Global Health (2021)
  • Radiology and Imaging (349)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)