Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Development and Presentation of an Objective Risk Stratification Tool for healthcare workers when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Risk modelling based on hospitalisation and mortality statistics compared to epidemiological data

View ORCID ProfileW David Strain, Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Su Sethi, Mala Rao
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967
W David Strain
8University of Exeter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W David Strain
  • For correspondence: d.strain@exeter.ac.uk
Janusz Jankowski
1Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angharad Davies
2Swansea University Medical School, Swansea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter MB English
3Public Health Medicine Committee, British Medical Association, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellis Friedman
4Faculty of Public Health, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena McKeown
5British Medical Association
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su Sethi
7North West Commissioning Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mala Rao
6Imperial College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Healthcare workers have a greater exposure to individuals with confirmed SARS-novel coronavirus 2, and an estimated 5-fold higher probability of contracting coronavirus disease (COVID)-19, than the general population. Many organisations have called for risk assessments to be put in place to minimise this risk. We wished to explore the predictive role of basic demographics in order to establish a simple tool that could help risk stratify healthcare workers.

Setting We undertook a review of the published literature (including multiple search strategies in MEDLINE with PubMed interface) and critically assessed early reports on medRxiv, a pre-print server (https://www.medrxiv.org: date of last search: December 21, 2020). We explored the relative risk of mortality from readily available demographics in order to identify the population at highest risk.

Results The only published studies specifically assessing the risk of healthcare workers had limited demographics available, therefore we explored the general population in the literature.

Clinician Demographics Mortality increased with increasing age from 50 years onwards. Male sex at birth, people of black and minority ethnicity groups had higher susceptibility to both hospitalisation and mortality. Co-morbid Disease. Vascular disease, renal disease, diabetes and chronic pulmonary disease further increased risk.

Risk stratification tool A risk stratification tool was compiled using a Caucasian female <50years with no comorbidities as a reference. A point allocated to risk factors associated with an approximate doubling in risk. This tool provides numerical support for healthcare workers when determining which team members should be allocated to patient facing clinical duties compared to remote supportive roles.

Conclusions We have generated a tool which can provide a framework for objective risk stratification of doctors and health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic, without requiring disclosure of information that an individual may not wish to share with their direct line manager during the risk assessment process.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • There is an increased risk of mortality in the clinical workforce due to the effects of COVID-19.

  • This manuscript outlines a simple risk stratification tool that helps to quantify an individual’s biological risk

  • This will assist team leaders when allocating roles within clinical departments.

  • This tool does not incorporate other external factors, such as high-risk household members or those at higher risk of mental health issues, that may require additional consideration when allocating clinical duties in an appropriate clinical domain.

  • This population-based analysis did not explain for the very high risk observed in BAME healthcare workers suggesting there are other issues at play that require addressing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This performed a secondary analysis of existing data. No new data were produced

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

There is no new data - this represents an analysis of published data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 02, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and Presentation of an Objective Risk Stratification Tool for healthcare workers when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Risk modelling based on hospitalisation and mortality statistics compared to epidemiological data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Development and Presentation of an Objective Risk Stratification Tool for healthcare workers when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Risk modelling based on hospitalisation and mortality statistics compared to epidemiological data
W David Strain, Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Su Sethi, Mala Rao
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20091967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Development and Presentation of an Objective Risk Stratification Tool for healthcare workers when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Risk modelling based on hospitalisation and mortality statistics compared to epidemiological data
W David Strain, Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Su Sethi, Mala Rao
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20091967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9782)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2318)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11656)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (239)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2148)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4673)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)