Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Risk Stratification tool for Healthcare workers during the CoViD-19 Pandemic; using published data on demographics, co-morbid disease and clinical domain in order to assign biological risk

Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Mala Rao, Su Sethi, View ORCID ProfileW. David Strain
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967
Janusz Jankowski
1Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire
2Comprehensive Clinical trials Unit, University College London
3Department of Life Sciences, Roehampton University, London
4Consultant Committee, British Medical Association, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angharad Davies
5Swansea University Medical School, Swansea
6Medical Academic Staff Committee, British Medical Association, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter MB English
7Public Health Medicine Committee, British Medical Association, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellis Friedman
4Consultant Committee, British Medical Association, London
8Faculty of Public Health, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena McKeown
9Portfolio GP, Wiltshire
10Chair of Representative body, British Medical Association, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mala Rao
4Consultant Committee, British Medical Association, London
11Imperial College, London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su Sethi
4Consultant Committee, British Medical Association, London
12North West Commissioning Team, Liverpool
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. David Strain
6Medical Academic Staff Committee, British Medical Association, London
13College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. David Strain
  • For correspondence: d.strain@exeter.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Healthcare workers have a greater exposure to individuals with confirmed SARS-novel coronavirus 2, and thus a higher probability of contracting coronavirus disease (CoViD)-19, than the general population. Employers have a duty of care to minimise the risk for their employees. We wished to explore the predictive role of basic demographics in order to establish a simple tool that could help risk stratify healthcare workers.

Methods We undertook a review of the published literature (including multiple search strategies in MEDLINE with PubMed interface) and critically assessed early reports on medRxiv, a pre-print server (https://www.medrxiv.org: date of last search: May 18, 2020). We explored the relative risk of mortality from readily available demographics in order to identify the population at highest risk and incorporated them into a biological risk assessment tool.

Results There were a multitude of international studies exploring the predictors of adverse outcomes in the general population. Two UK based datasources were identified that predicted admission to ITU and mortality in the UK population. Mortality increased with increasing age from 50 years onwards. Male sex at birth and people of black and minority ethnicity groups had higher susceptibility to both hospitalisation and mortality. Similarly, vascular disease, diabetes and chronic pulmonary disease further increased risk.

A risk stratification tool was compiled using a Caucasian female <50years of age with no comorbidities as a reference. Each point allocated to risk factors was associated with an approximate doubling in risk. This tool provides objective support for employers when determining which healthcare workers should be allocated to high-risk vs. lower risk patient facing clinical duties or to remote supportive roles.

Conclusions We have generated a tool which can provide a framework for objective risk stratification of doctors and health care professionals during the CoViD-19 pandemic.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • There is potentially an increased risk of mortality in the clinical workforce due to the effects of CoViD-19.

  • This manuscript outlines a simple risk stratification tool that helps to quantify an individual’s biological risk

  • This will assist team leaders when allocating roles within clinical departments.

  • This tool does not incorporate other external factors, such as high-risk household members or those at higher risk of mental health issues, that may require additional consideration when allocating clinical duties in an appropriate clinical domain.

  • This population-based analysis did not explain for the very high risk observed in BAME healthcare workers suggesting there are other issues at play that require addressing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

There is no new data - this represents an analysis of published data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 20, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Stratification tool for Healthcare workers during the CoViD-19 Pandemic; using published data on demographics, co-morbid disease and clinical domain in order to assign biological risk
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Risk Stratification tool for Healthcare workers during the CoViD-19 Pandemic; using published data on demographics, co-morbid disease and clinical domain in order to assign biological risk
Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Mala Rao, Su Sethi, W. David Strain
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20091967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Risk Stratification tool for Healthcare workers during the CoViD-19 Pandemic; using published data on demographics, co-morbid disease and clinical domain in order to assign biological risk
Janusz Jankowski, Angharad Davies, Peter MB English, Ellis Friedman, Helena McKeown, Mala Rao, Su Sethi, W. David Strain
medRxiv 2020.05.05.20091967; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091967

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (496)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1110)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (275)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (505)
  • Epidemiology (9796)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2327)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1567)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (608)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (508)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11669)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2154)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (340)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (519)
  • Oncology (1185)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (221)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (314)
  • Pediatrics (699)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (303)
  • Primary Care Research (268)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2195)
  • Public and Global Health (4685)
  • Radiology and Imaging (786)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (458)
  • Respiratory Medicine (625)
  • Rheumatology (276)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (212)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)