Abstract
Background Stigma has been considered a significant barrier both in treatment, rehabilitation and help-seeking behaviours of people diagnosed with depression. This study aimed to validate the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS) to the Portuguese population, to assess the influence of the type of previous experience with depression on the levels of depression stigma, identifying depression stigma predictors in each type of previous experience with depression and to analyse the effects of stigma on help-seeking attitudes.
Methods A total of 1693 participants with a mean age of 47.2 (SD=18.17) completed the DSS, the Attitude Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help, and a socio-demographic questionnaire. Participants were categorised into four comparison groups: no previous experience with depression (n=479), indirect experience with depression (n=661), direct experience with depression (n=137), and both direct and indirect experience with depression (n=416). We performed data analysis using SPSS 24.0.
Results The DSS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. Levels of personal stigma were lower in people who had family and friends experiencing depression in comparison with individuals with no history of depression experience. Better attitudes towards help-seeking were evident in those with lower personal stigma and worse help-seeking attitudes were associated with higher perceived stigma in the indirect previous experience group.
Limitations There were some differences in the socio-demographic characteristics across groups and no data were collected on the duration of participant exposure to depression.
Conclusions Our study demonstrates the validity of DSS in the Portuguese population. The individual’s experience with depression influences the development of personal stigmatising beliefs and attitudes towards depression and plays a role in help-seeking behaviours. Addressing people’s experience of depression might be a practical way of reducing depression stigma and improve help-seeking behaviours.
Funding Funding for this study was provided by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 223138. The funding partner had no role in the design of the study; in the data collection; in the analyses and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 223138. The funding partner had no role in the design of the study; in the data collection; in the analyses and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available upon request to the corresponding author.
