Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The reproduction number of COVID-19 and its correlation with public health interventions

View ORCID ProfileKevin Linka, View ORCID ProfileMathias Peirlinck, View ORCID ProfileEllen Kuhl
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088047
Kevin Linka
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States, klinka/mpeirlin/
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin Linka
  • For correspondence: ekuhl@stanford.edu
Mathias Peirlinck
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States, klinka/mpeirlin/
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mathias Peirlinck
  • For correspondence: ekuhl@stanford.edu
Ellen Kuhl
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States, klinka/mpeirlin/
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ellen Kuhl
  • For correspondence: ekuhl@stanford.edu ekuhl@stanford.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Throughout the past six months, no number has dominated the public media more persistently than the reproduction number of COVID-19. This powerful but simple concept is widely used by the public media, scientists, and political decision makers to explain and justify political strategies to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we explore the effectiveness of political interventions using the reproduction number of COVID-19 across Europe. We propose a dynamic SEIR epidemiology model with a time-varying reproduction number, which we identify using machine learning. During the early outbreak, the basic reproduction number was 4.22±1.69, with maximum values of 6.33 and 5.88 in Germany and the Netherlands. By May 10, 2020, it dropped to 0.67±0.18, with minimum values of 0.37 and 0.28 in Hungary and Slovakia. We found a strong correlation between passenger air travel, driving, walking, and transit mobility and the effective reproduction number with a time delay of 17.24±2.00 days. Our new dynamic SEIR model provides the flexibility to simulate various outbreak control and exit strategies to inform political decision making and identify safe solutions in the benefit of global health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a DAAD Fellowship to Kevin Linka and a Stanford Bio-X IIP seed grant to Mathias Peirlinck and Ellen Kuhl and by the National Institutes of Health Grant U01 HL119578.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

n/a

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data are publicly available in public databases with references listed in this article.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 07, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The reproduction number of COVID-19 and its correlation with public health interventions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The reproduction number of COVID-19 and its correlation with public health interventions
Kevin Linka, Mathias Peirlinck, Ellen Kuhl
medRxiv 2020.05.01.20088047; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088047
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The reproduction number of COVID-19 and its correlation with public health interventions
Kevin Linka, Mathias Peirlinck, Ellen Kuhl
medRxiv 2020.05.01.20088047; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088047

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (196)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (489)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (168)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5677)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (863)
  • Geriatric Medicine (88)
  • Health Economics (230)
  • Health Informatics (761)
  • Health Policy (390)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (251)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (182)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6471)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (390)
  • Medical Education (117)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (91)
  • Neurology (847)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (162)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (258)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (163)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (250)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (114)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (965)
  • Public and Global Health (2226)
  • Radiology and Imaging (377)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (312)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)