Abstract
Background Observational studies have found associations between salt intake with obesity, body shape and composition; but the findings may be biased by residual confounding.
Objective To analyze the causal associations between salt intake and obesity measures in both sex-combined and sex-specific models.
Designs This was a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies of urinary sodium secretion (UNa, a surrogate for salt intake), body mass index (BMI), BMI-adjusted waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body fat (BF) percentage and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were identified. We initially extracted fifty SNPs associated with UNa at GWA significance level of 5 × 10−8, but further removed those SNPs with potential horizontal pleiotropy. Univariable MR and multivariable MR with adjustment for eGFR were performed. Inverse-variance weighted MR was performed as the primary analysis, with MR-Egger methods as sensitivity analysis. The potential bidirectional association between BMI and UNa was investigated. All exposure and outcomes were continuous, and the effect measure was linear regression coefficients (beta) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
Results UNa was causally associated with increased BMI in both men (eGFR-adjusted beta 0.443 (0.163 to 0.724)) and women (0.594 (0.333 to 0.855)). UNa caused BF percentage increase in men (0.622 (0.268 to 0.976)) and women (0.334 (0.007 to 0.662)). UNa significantly elevated BMI-adjusted WHR in men (0.321 (0.094 to 0.548)), but not in women (0.170 (−0.052 to 0.391)). Additionally, we found that BMI causally increased UNa (0.043 (0.023 to 0.063)).
Conclusions Salt intake increased BMI and BF percentage. Salt intake affects male body shape by increasing BMI-adjusted WHR, but showed no effects on female body shape. The bidirectional association between BMI and UNa suggested that salt reduction measures and weight reduction measures should be implemented simultaneously to break the vicious cycle and gain more health benefits.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
No individual participant data were involved.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NA.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available upon request.
