ABSTRACT
Background Individuals with major depressive disorder present with deficits in emotional reactivity. Conflicting models have been proposed to characterise the direction of this effect. Previous studies mostly support the emotional context insensitivity model, which suggests that reactivity to positive and negatively-valenced emotional stimuli is blunted in depression. We sought to test the emotional context insensitivity hypothesis in a preregistered study.
Methods Forty-one depressed participants and 41 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were shown a series of unpleasant and neutrally-valenced pictures in a passive view paradigm while acquiring electroencephalography (EEG). The late positive potential (LPP), an EEG marker of emotional reactivity, was compared between groups using mixed-effects repeated-measures models and exploratory cluster-based permutation tests.
Results We found no difference in LPP amplitudes between MDD and healthy individuals using the preregistered analysis plan. However, exploratory permutation analysis revealed a significant reduction in the LPP for MDD participants while viewing unpleasant pictures in EEG electrodes marginally more posterior and within a narrower time interval than specified in our original analysis plan. Secondary analyses found that emotion regulation strategy use and anxiety comorbidity did not influence the LPP.
Conclusions We found significantly reduced LPP amplitudes to unpleasant pictures in MDD, in support of the emotional context insensitivity hypothesis. However, the parameters used to estimate the LPP deviated from the preregistered analysis plan, suggesting that methodological differences between studies may result in variability in the cortical response to emotional stimuli.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This was not a clinical trial. Depressed participants were compared to healthy age- and gender-matched controls in the absence of an intervention. The trial was, however, preregistered (citation provided in the manuscript body).
Funding Statement
Donel Martin and Tjeerd Boonstra were both funded by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award (grant numbers 24015 and 26060, respectively) from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Participant consent was not obtained to make data publically available. However, SPSS syntax for mixed-effects repeated measures model statistical analyses, Inquisit 5 scripts to run the experimental protocol, and MATLAB scripts for EEG processing, cluster-based permutation tests, and plotting of figures, has been made available online at https://github.com/snikolin/MDDvsCTRL_IAPS.