Abstract
Background A large portion of prescribing errors can be attributed to medication knowledge deficiency. They are preventable and most often occur in the stage of ordering. Antimicrobials are the drug class most commonly related to prescribing errors.
Objectives The study main objective was to describe the relationship between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors. Secondary objectives were to measure clinical competence of junior medical residents with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), to describe the frequency and severity of antibiotic prescription errors and to find items and attributes of clinical competence that are correlated with the antibiotic prescription error ratio.
Methods A cross-sectional study was designed to assess the clinical competence of junior medical residents, from National Institute of Pediatrics and “Manuel Gea Gonzalez” General Hospital in Mexico City, through an infectious disease OSCE and measure the frequency and severity of antibiotic prescription errors. Statistical analysis included generalizability theory and internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha, a partial correlation controlling sex and time of degree, simple linear regression and item’s exploratory factorial analysis.
Results The mean OSCE score was 0.692 ± 0.073. The inter-item Cronbach’s alpha was 0.927 and inter-station Cronbach’s alpha was 0.774. The G coefficient in generalizability theory analysis was 0.84. The antibiotic prescription error ratio was 45.1% ± 7%. The severity of antibiotic prescription errors was: category C (errors that do not cause patient harm) = 56 cases, 15.5%; category D (monitoring required to confirm that errors resulted in no harm to the patient or intervention required to preclude harm) = 51 cases, 14.1%; category E (errors that may contribute to or result in temporary harm to the patient and require intervention) = 235, 65.2%; category F (errors that may contribute to or resulted in temporary harm to the patient and require initial or prolonged hospitalization) = 18 cases, 5%. The correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription errors was established with Pearson correlation (r=-0.33, p<0.05, CI95% -0.57 to -0.07), and partial correlation controlling effect of gender and time since graduation (r=-0.39, p<0.01, CI95% -0.625 to -0.118).
Conclusions We found a negative correlation between clinical competence and antibiotic prescription error ratio in graduated physicians who have been accepted in a medical specialty. The therapeutic plan, which is a component of clinical competence score, and the prescription skills had a negative correlation with antibiotic prescription errors. The most frequent mistakes in antibiotic prescriptions errors would need a second intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This study is a cross-sectional study and is not a clinical trial
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Coordination of Educational Development and Curricular Innovation (CODEIC) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Acknowledgments All authors approved the submitted version. All the authors would like to thank the staff of the Medical Education Department, Nacional Institute of Pediatrics and “Manuel Gea González” General Hospital for their support. Joshua Martínez-Domínguez is enrolled at the PECEM program of the Faculty of Medicine at UNAM and is supported by CONACyT.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data of our study is not available yet