Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 emissions from non-symptomatic cases

View ORCID ProfileMichael Riediker, View ORCID ProfileDai-Hua Tsai
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081398
Michael Riediker
1Swiss Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Winterthur, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Riediker
  • For correspondence: michael.riediker@alumni.ethz.ch
Dai-Hua Tsai
1Swiss Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Winterthur, Switzerland
2Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dai-Hua Tsai
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance Cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with no or mild symptoms were reported to frequently transmit the disease even without direct contact. The severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-COV-2) was found at very high concentrations in swab and sputum of such cases.

Objective We aimed to estimate virus release from such cases into different aerosol sizes by normal breathing and coughing, and what exposure can result from this in a room shared with such as case.

Data Sources and Model We combined the size-distribution of exhaled breath aerosols for coughing and normal breathing with viral sputum concentrations as approximation for lung lining liquid to obtain an estimate of emitted virus levels. The resulting emission data fed a single-compartment model of airborne concentrations in a room of 50m3, the size of a small office or medical exam room.

Results The estimated viral load in aerosols emitted by patients while breathing normally was on average 0.34 copies/cm3 and could go up to 11.5 copies/cm3. The corresponding numbers for coughing patients were 10,900 copies/cm3 and 366,000 copies/cm3, respectively, per cough. The resulting concentrations in a room with a coughing emitter were always very high, up to 2.02*10^9 copies/m3. However, also regular breathing aerosol from high emitters was predicted to lead to several thousand copies/m3.

Conclusions and Relevance These very high predicted virus concentrations may provide an explanation why for COVID-19, frequent community transmissions from non-symptomatic cases and also high infection rates in medical staff in hospital settings were reported. Our findings suggest that strict respiratory protection is needed when there is a chance to be in the same room with a patient - whether symptomatic or not - especially if this was for a prolonged time.

Question How much SARS-CoV-2 virus is released from a case by breathing and coughing, and what is the resulting concentration in a room?

Finding Both, breathing and coughing are predicted to release large numbers of viruses, which can lead to billions of virus copies/m3 in a poorly ventilated room with a coughing emitter.

Meaning These results may explain the high rate of transmissions and implies the need for strict respiratory protection when people are in the same room with a COVID-19 case.

Introduction

The novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), emerged in late 2019 in Wuhan, China1 from where it spread to the entire world. COVID-19 is caused by a novel type of Coronavirus, the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-COV-2)2. The host-receptor for SARS-CoV-2 was found to be Angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is present in cells of the lungs and airways3. A large number of patients hospitalized for other reasons and also an important proportion of the medical staff contracted COVID-19 4. This is remarkable given that medical professionals are trained at protecting themselves against infections. Also a series of community-transmissions were reported from cases that had no apparent symptoms, some even without direct contact 5–8. Correspondences about the viral load in samples from COVID-19 patients having no or only mild symptoms reported very high concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 in swab samples 8–10. This raised the question whether transfections could occur via the air.

When coughing, humans release thousands of aerosol droplets per cubic-centimeter in the size range of 0.6 to 15 μm, with the droplet concentration increasing strongly with cough flow rate 11. But also normal breathing will lead to some aerosol production, which is attributed to fluid film rupture in the respiratory bronchioles during inhalation leading to the formation of droplets that are released during exhalation 12. The size of these droplets is mostly below 1 μm 13. The mode of droplet generation implies that they consist of lung lining liquid including dispersed viruses. Indeed, human volunteers exposed to virus-sized nanoparticles show nano-scaled particles in their exhaled breath 14,15. Also, the described size distribution of particles emitted from coughing as well as normal respiration suggests that an important proportion of them will be able to remain airborne for many hours in turbulent conditions 16.

Objectives

This study aimed to estimate the cumulative viral load released from COVID-19 patients with no to moderate symptoms in different aerosol sizes via respiration and coughing. We then used this information to make a risk appraisal for the situation of a high emitter that is either breathing normally or coughing in a room operated at different air exchange rates. We chose a room size that is similar to a medical examination room or an office shared by two to three people.

Design and Methods

Concept

The release of viruses from individual patients was modeled by first calculating the viral load per exhaled droplets formed during normal breathing and while coughing. The resulting size-distribution provided an initial estimate of the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 virus copies released by a regularly breathing or coughing patient. This viral emission factor was then fed into a well-mixed one-compartment model to simulate the situation in a closed room with different ventilation air exchange rates.

Data sources

Data on the number of viral copies present in sputum was used to estimate the SARS-CoV-2 viral load present in the lining liquid of respiratory bronchioles in patients 9, specifically an average of 7*10^6 copies/ml with a maximum of 2.35*10^9 copies/ml (hereafter referred to as "high emitters"), and 1,000 copies/ml representing a low-virus producing patient ("low emitters").

Exhaled aerosol size distributions and numbers were retrieved from published studies on coughing11 and healthy persons 12. Both studies assessed the size-number distribution of freshly emitted aerosols. The concentration of viral copies in each aerosol size was calculated from the volume of the aerosols, the actual count number in each size and the above-mentioned virus-load per ml sputum. The viral load in the actual aerosol counts in each aerosol size was then used to calculate the total viral concentration. The cumulative emissions in the PM10 fraction were summed up after applying the standard size fractionation curves 17 to the aerosol distribution.

Model

A one-compartment model estimated the virus load concentration C for a perfectly mixed room of volume VR of 50 m3 with one patient as source, using the following mass-balance (equation 1):

Embedded Image

The emission rate was calculated from the concentration Cpm10, the viral load in the PM10-size range, which are particles collected with a 50% efficiency cut-off at 10 μm aerodynamic diameter; and a respiratory rate of 15 breaths per minute (RR) at a tidal volume of Vt of 500 ml per breath. Air exchange rates (ER) used were 1-, 3-, 10- and 20-times per hour. The virus’ half-life t½ of 1.1 hours was obtained from an experimental study about the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces and when airborne 18, tested by assessing the 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50).

The model for coughing was identical, except that coughing was assumed to happen every 30 seconds at a volume of 250 ml.

All statistics and models were calculated using Stata/SE 15.1 (Mac 64-bit Intel, Rev. 03 Feb 2020, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Emissions from normal breathing patients

To estimate the virus emissions from patients breathing normally, we first calculated the viral load for the aerosol size distribution. Figure 1 shows that the highest virus load is present in the largest aerosol size. The cumulative total emission per breath was 0.34 copies/cm3(air) for an average patient, and 11.5 copies/cm3 for high emitters. The cumulative emissions in the PM10 fraction were about 1/3 of these values with 0.12 copies/cm3 (average) and 4.1 copies/cm3 (high) per breath.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

Size distribution of exhaled aerosols (left) during normal respiration and resulting viral emissions per breath (right) for average (red), high and low emitters (spike-lines) per aerosol size.

Emission from coughing patient

We then estimated the virus emissions from a coughing patient (Figure 2). The cumulative total emission per cough was 19,400 copies/cm3 for an average patient, and 651,315 copies/cm3 for high emitters. The cumulative emissions in the PM10 fraction were about 1/2 of these values with 10,900 copies/cm3 (average) and 366,000 copies/cm3 (high) per cough.

Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2:

Size distribution of exhaled aerosols (left) during coughing and resulting viral emissions per breath (right) with average (red), high and low emitters (spike-lines) per aerosol size.

Exposure estimation for bystanders

To estimate the exposure of bystanders spending time in the same room as a COVID-19 positive person, we calculated the time-course of the viral load in the thoracic size fraction for aerosols released from a high-emitter either breathing normally or coughing. Figure 3 shows the results for a high-emitting patient coughing frequently.

Figure 3:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3:

Temporal course of airborne virus load in a perfectly mixed room of 50 m3 for different air exchange rates. The emitter has a high virus-load in the lungs and is coughing intermittently.

For a typical hospital ventilation situation of 10 air exchanges per hour, the concentration plateaus after about 30 minutes, while for a typical office with 3 air exchanges/hour, concentrations continue to rise for almost three hours. In the used model, concentrations scale linearly with the patient emission rate, the plateau concentrations for different emitting patients and ventilation types are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1: Plateau concentration for different combinations of air exchange rate, emission form and emitter type

Discussion

An elevated number of viruses is expected to be released by COIVD-19 patients in the form of airborne aerosols, especially when they are coughing. While the bigger portion of the emitted viral load is in the form of large particles that can deposit rapidly, there is also an important portion in the smaller size fractions. Small aerosols can remain airborne for an extended time 16 and are very effective at reaching the deeper regions of the lungs.

An average person breathes about a half m3 per hour in resting state 19, which can rapidly increase to several m3 during exercise 20. Thus, a person spending time in a room with an average emitting patient breathing normally has a realistic chance of inhaling tens to hundreds of copies of the virus even when keeping distance from that person. The situation is worse in the presence of a high emitter and worst if the patient is a coughing high emitter. A review of a wide range of respiratory viruses suggests that the infective dose is often quite low. Sometimes as few as few hundred units of active virus (TCID50) 21 seem sufficient to provoke a disease. Thus, our modelling suggests that there is a clear risk of infections for a person spending an extended time in the room with an infected person, even if the distance is too large for direct transmission. The situation is worse if the person is coughing.

The very high virus load in exhaled respiratory aerosols proposed by our assessment may be an explanation why COVID-19 was associated with much more transfections to hospital staff than what was expected from SARS 4. While having everybody wear a surgical face mask can be an effective source control 22, the protective factors may still be insufficient if an extended amount of time is spent in the same room, especially if the room is small and the ventilation low. Increasing ventilation can help to some extent but is not sufficient in a room of the size of a typical office or medical exam room. Note also that ventilation design for hospitals is complex and not always functioning as intended 23.

What are the implications for the normal life and the workplace?

  • The risk of infection is real when being near an infected person in a room for more than a few minutes and this even when keeping distance to that person.

  • Sharing a workplace in a small room with a non-symptomatic case seems not advised. This implies that workplaces should not be shared as long as there are no rapid tests to differentiate between healthy and non-symptomatic cases.

  • Medical staff is advised to wear the best possible respiratory protection whenever in the same room as a patient, especially when this person is coughing.

  • In addition, every patient, also non-symptomatic ones, should wear a well-fitting surgical face mask to reduce emissions, which will increase the overall protection for the medical staff.

Our assessment has a number of limitations. Namely

  • The estimated virus levels strongly depend on the number of virus copies produced by a COVID-19 case. We used sputum data from a well described peer-reviewed study 9 assuming that it is a reasonable approximation for the virus load in the respiratory bronchioles, the space where most respiratory aerosols are formed. Our high-emitter estimates would be 100-fold higher if the most extreme correspondence data was used10.

  • We used information about virus copies but compare the results with TCID50 infective dose. Research on other virus types suggests that the number of virus copies and TCID50 are comparable 24. However, it would be important to confirm this relationship for the case of SARS-CoV-2.

  • For breath aerosols release, we used data reported for normal breathing young healthy subjects. However, aerosol formation is influenced by surface tension of the lung lining liquid 25. It is likely that aerosol formation will be altered in COVID-19 positive cases but it is not clear in which direction.

  • Aerosol droplet will shrink in dry air 26, resulting in a shift to smaller particle sizes. This will not directly change the number of copies in the PM10 range but simply upconcentrate the viral load per aerosol. While we addressed passivation of viruses in the air by using the documented half-life18, it is still possible that viruses in smaller droplets are quicker passivated because of shorter diffusion distances for airborne oxidants and faster increasing salinity. Our estimates would be slightly smaller if this was relevant.

Data Availability

All data sources are mentioned in the manuscript and publicly available.

Acknowledgments

This modelling was entirely funded by the Swiss Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health (SCOEH).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727–733. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: The Species and Its Viruses – a Statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. Microbiology; 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.02.07.937862
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Qi F, Qian S, Zhang S, Zhang Z. Single cell RNA sequencing of 13 human tissues identify cell types and receptors of human coronaviruses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. March 2020:S0006291X20305234. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. February 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, et al. Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Residents of a Long-Term Care Skilled Nursing Facility - King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):377–381. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    Li R, Pei S, Chen B, et al. Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). Science. March 2020. doi:10.1126/science.abb3221
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177–1179. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2001737
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Wölfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. April 2020. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LLM, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):411–412. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Yang S, Lee GWM, Chen C-M, Wu C-C, Yu K-P. The Size and Concentration of Droplets Generated by Coughing in Human Subjects. J Aerosol Med. 2007;20(4):484–494. doi:10.1089/jam.2007.0610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Johnson GR, Morawska L. The Mechanism of Breath Aerosol Formation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2009;22(3):229–237. doi:10.1089/jamp.2008.0720
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Papineni RS, Rosenthal FS. The Size Distribution of Droplets in the Exhaled Breath of Healthy Human Subjects. J Aerosol Med. 1997;10(2):105–116. doi:10.1089/jam.1997.10.105
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Gschwind S, Graczyk H, Günther D, Riediker M. A method for the preservation and determination of welding fume nanoparticles in exhaled breath condensate. Env Sci Nano. 2016;3(2):357–364. doi:10.1039/C5EN00240K
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Sauvain J-J, Hohl MSS, Wild P, Pralong JA, Riediker M. Exhaled breath condensate as a matrix for combustion-based nanoparticle exposure and health effect evaluation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014;27(6):449–458. doi:10.1089/jamp.2013.1101
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    Willeke K, Baron PA, eds. Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993.
  17. 17.↵
    BSI. EN 481:1993 Workplace Atmospheres. Size Fraction Definitions for Measurement of Airborne Particles. BSI; 1993.
  18. 18.↵
    van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. March 2020:NEJMc2004973. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2004973
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Beardsell I, ed. Get through MCEM. Part A: MCQs. London: RSM; 2011.
  20. 20.↵
    Ramos CA, Reis JF, Almeida T, Alves F, Wolterbeek HT, Almeida SM. Estimating the inhaled dose of pollutants during indoor physical activity. Sci Total Environ. 2015;527–528:111–118. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.120
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Yezli S, Otter JA. Minimum Infective Dose of the Major Human Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Transmitted Through Food and the Environment. Food Environ Virol. 2011;3(1):1–30. doi:10.1007/s12560-011-9056-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    Patel RB, Skaria SD, Mansour MM, Smaldone GC. Respiratory source control using a surgical mask: An in vitro study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(7):569–576. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1043050
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Grosskopf KR, Herstein KR. The aerodynamic behavior of respiratory aerosols within a general patient room. 2012;18(4):15.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Kim J-O, Kim W-S, Kim S-W, et al. Development and Application of Quantitative Detection Method for Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus (VHSV) Genogroup IVa. Viruses. 2014;6(5):2204–2213. doi:10.3390/v6052204
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Edwards DA, Man JC, Brand P, et al. Inhaling to mitigate exhaled bioaerosols. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(50):17383–17388. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408159101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Holmgren H, Bake B, Olin A-C, Ljungström E. Relation Between Humidity and Size of Exhaled Particles. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2011;24(5):253–260. doi:10.1089/jamp.2011.0880
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 emissions from non-symptomatic cases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 emissions from non-symptomatic cases
Michael Riediker, Dai-Hua Tsai
medRxiv 2020.04.27.20081398; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081398
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 emissions from non-symptomatic cases
Michael Riediker, Dai-Hua Tsai
medRxiv 2020.04.27.20081398; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9782)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2318)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11656)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2148)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4673)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)