Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research

View ORCID ProfileMelissa D McCradden, View ORCID ProfileTasmie Sarker, View ORCID ProfileP Alison Paprica
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079814
Melissa D McCradden
1The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Bioethics, 525 University Ave, 8th Floor Suite 845, Toronto, M5G 2L3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Melissa D McCradden
Tasmie Sarker
2Vector Institute, 710-661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tasmie Sarker
P Alison Paprica
2Vector Institute, 710-661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
3Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St. 4th Floor, Toronto ON M5T 3M6, Canada
4Health Data Research Network Canada, 25th Floor, 700 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC, V7Y 1B3, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P Alison Paprica
  • For correspondence: alison.paprica@utoronto.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

  • Focus Group Discussion Guide
  • Health AI Scenarios
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 01, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
Melissa D McCradden, Tasmie Sarker, P Alison Paprica
medRxiv 2020.04.25.20079814; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079814
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
Melissa D McCradden, Tasmie Sarker, P Alison Paprica
medRxiv 2020.04.25.20079814; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (166)
  • Anesthesia (49)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (188)
  • Epidemiology (5206)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (194)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (747)
  • Geriatric Medicine (76)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (691)
  • Health Policy (350)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (221)
  • Hematology (98)
  • HIV/AIDS (161)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5798)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (355)
  • Medical Education (101)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (754)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (230)
  • Oncology (473)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (93)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (138)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (851)
  • Public and Global Health (1987)
  • Radiology and Imaging (342)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (155)
  • Respiratory Medicine (282)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (74)
  • Surgery (107)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)