Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Nationwide Survey of UK cardiac surgeons’ view on clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic

View ORCID ProfileUmberto Benedetto, Andrew Goodwin, Simon Kendall, Rakesh Uppal, Enoch Akowuah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.24.20078105
Umberto Benedetto
1University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Umberto Benedetto
  • For correspondence: umberto.benedetto@bristol.ac.uk
Andrew Goodwin
2South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Kendall
2South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Uppal
3Barts Health NHS Turst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enoch Akowuah
2South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background No firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic appraisal of national expert consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available. Hence, we aimed to collect and quantitatively appraise nationwide UK senior surgeons’ opinion on clinical decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods We mailed a web-based questionnaire to all consultant cardiac surgeons through the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland (SCTS) mailing list on the 17th April 2020 and we pre-determined to close the survey on the 21st April 2020. This survey was primarily designed to gather information on UK surgeons’ opinion using 12 items. Strong consensus was predefined as an opinion shared by at least 60% of responding consultants.

Results A total of 86 consultant surgeons undertook the survey. All UK cardiac units were represented by at least one consultant. Strong consensus was achieved for the following key questions:1) before hospital admission every patient should receive nasopharyngeal swab, PCR and chest CT; 2) the use of full PPE should to be adopted in every case by the theatre team regardless patient’s COVID-19 status; 3) the risk of COVID-19 exposure for patients undergoing heart surgery should be considered moderate to high and likely to increase mortality if it occurs; 4) cardiac procedure should be decided based on ad-hoc multidisciplinary team discussion for every patient. The majority believed that both aortic and mitral surgery should be considered in selected cases. The role of CABG surgery during the pandemic was more controversial.

Conclusions In the current unprecedented scenario, the present survey provides information for generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available.

Perspective statement Systematic appraisal of national expert consensus can be used to generate interim recommendations for patients undergoing cardiac surgery during COVID-19 pandemic until data from clinical observations will become available.

Central message No firm recommendations are currently available to guide decision making for patients requiring cardiac surgery during the pandemic. This can translate into significant variability in clinical practice and patients’ outcomes across cardiac units. Systematic appraisal of national expert consensus can represent a rapid and efficient instrument to provide support to heath policy makers and other stakeholders in generating interim recommendations until data from clinical observations will become available.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

none

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • No conflict to disclose

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request

  • Glossary

    AV
    aortic valve
    CABG
    coronary artery bypass graft
    COVID-19
    Coronavirus disease 2019
    CT
    computerised tomography
    MDT
    multidisciplinary team
    MV
    mitral valve
    PRC
    polymerase chain reaction
    PPEs
    Personal Protective Equipment
    STEMI
    ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    TAVI
    Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 29, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    A Nationwide Survey of UK cardiac surgeons’ view on clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    A Nationwide Survey of UK cardiac surgeons’ view on clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Umberto Benedetto, Andrew Goodwin, Simon Kendall, Rakesh Uppal, Enoch Akowuah
    medRxiv 2020.04.24.20078105; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.24.20078105
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    A Nationwide Survey of UK cardiac surgeons’ view on clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Umberto Benedetto, Andrew Goodwin, Simon Kendall, Rakesh Uppal, Enoch Akowuah
    medRxiv 2020.04.24.20078105; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.24.20078105

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Cardiovascular Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (228)
    • Allergy and Immunology (504)
    • Anesthesia (110)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1238)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
    • Dermatology (147)
    • Emergency Medicine (282)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (531)
    • Epidemiology (10021)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (499)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2453)
    • Geriatric Medicine (238)
    • Health Economics (479)
    • Health Informatics (1643)
    • Health Policy (752)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
    • Hematology (248)
    • HIV/AIDS (533)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11864)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
    • Medical Education (252)
    • Medical Ethics (75)
    • Nephrology (268)
    • Neurology (2280)
    • Nursing (139)
    • Nutrition (352)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (536)
    • Oncology (1245)
    • Ophthalmology (377)
    • Orthopedics (134)
    • Otolaryngology (226)
    • Pain Medicine (157)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (324)
    • Pediatrics (730)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (313)
    • Primary Care Research (282)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
    • Public and Global Health (4833)
    • Radiology and Imaging (837)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (491)
    • Respiratory Medicine (651)
    • Rheumatology (285)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (238)
    • Sports Medicine (227)
    • Surgery (267)
    • Toxicology (44)
    • Transplantation (125)
    • Urology (99)