Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Analysis of national and international guidelines on respiratory protection equipment for COVID-19 in healthcare settings

View ORCID ProfileGabriel Birgand, Nico T. Mutters, Jonathan Otter, Vanessa M. Eichel, Didier Lepelletier, Daniel J. Morgan, Jean-Christophe Lucet
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077230
Gabriel Birgand
1NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK
2Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriel Birgand
  • For correspondence: g.birgand@imperial.ac.uk
Nico T. Mutters
3Heidelberg University Hospital, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Otter
1NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanessa M. Eichel
3Heidelberg University Hospital, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Didier Lepelletier
2Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Morgan
4University of Maryland School of Medicine, VA Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Christophe Lucet
5INSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, F-75018 Paris, France; Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75018 Paris, France
6AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat – Claude Bernard, Infection Control Unit, F-75018 Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Consistent guidelines on respiratory protection for healthcare professionals combined with improved global supply chains are critical to prevent COVID-19. We analysed the guidelines published by national and international societies/organizations on facemasks and respirators to prevent COVID-19 in healthcare settings.

Methods From the 1st January to the 2nd April 2020, guidelines published in four countries (France, Germany, United States, United Kingdom), and two international organizations (US and European Centre for Diseases Control, and World Health Organization) were reviewed to analyse the mask and respirators recommended for healthcare settings during the COVID-19 outbreak. The aerosol generating procedures (AGP) definitions and the strategy recommended for optimizing supplies and overcoming shortages were collected.

Findings The recommendation of respirator was universally recommended for AGP across countries, although the type of respirators and what constituted an AGP was variable. Some guidance maintained the use of N95/99 for all contact with confirmed COVID-19 cases (i.e. Germany) whereas others, recommended a surgical mask (i.e. WHO, UK, France). Most guidelines were published in March with either downgraded (US and European CDC), relatively stable (WHO, Germany, and UK), or a mixing of high and low level equipment (France). The strategies to overcome shortage of respiratory protection equipment were based on minimizing the need and rationalizing the use, but also prolonging their use, reusing them after cleaning/sterilization, or using cloth masks.

Interpretations In a crisis context, stable and consistent guidelines clearly detailing the respiratory protection type, and their indications, may prevent the confusion and anxiety among frontline staff, and avoid shortage.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England. GB has received an Early Career Research Fellowship from the Antimicrobial Research Collaborative at Imperial College London, and acknowledges the support of the Welcome trust. RA is supported by a NIHR Fellowship in knowledge mobilisation. The support of ESRC as part of the Antimicrobial Cross Council initiative supported by the seven UK research councils, and also the support of the Global Challenges Research Fund, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data referred to in the manuscript are available online

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 29, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of national and international guidelines on respiratory protection equipment for COVID-19 in healthcare settings
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Analysis of national and international guidelines on respiratory protection equipment for COVID-19 in healthcare settings
Gabriel Birgand, Nico T. Mutters, Jonathan Otter, Vanessa M. Eichel, Didier Lepelletier, Daniel J. Morgan, Jean-Christophe Lucet
medRxiv 2020.04.23.20077230; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077230
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Analysis of national and international guidelines on respiratory protection equipment for COVID-19 in healthcare settings
Gabriel Birgand, Nico T. Mutters, Jonathan Otter, Vanessa M. Eichel, Didier Lepelletier, Daniel J. Morgan, Jean-Christophe Lucet
medRxiv 2020.04.23.20077230; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077230

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (47)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (49)
  • Emergency Medicine (144)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4864)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (678)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (633)
  • Health Policy (322)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (207)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5352)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (332)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (689)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (127)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (208)
  • Oncology (443)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (90)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (130)
  • Pediatrics (196)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (781)
  • Public and Global Health (1819)
  • Radiology and Imaging (325)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (101)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)