Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings

Adam Kucharski, Petra Klepac, Andrew Conlan, Stephen Kissler, Maria Tang, Hannah Fry, Julia Gog, John Edmunds, CMMID COVID-19 working group
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077024
Adam Kucharski
1Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: adam.kucharski@lshtm.ac.uk
Petra Klepac
1Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Conlan
2Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Kissler
3Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Tang
4Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Fry
5Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Gog
4Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Edmunds
1Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Isolation of symptomatic cases and tracing of contacts has been used as an early COVID-19 containment measure in many countries, with additional physical distancing measures also introduced as outbreaks have grown. To maintain control of infection while also reducing disruption to populations, there is a need to understand what combination of measures – including novel digital tracing approaches and less intensive physical distancing – may be required to reduce transmission.

Methods Using a model of individual-level transmission stratified by setting (household, work, school, other) based on BBC Pandemic data from 40,162 UK participants, we simulated the impact of a range of different testing, isolation, tracing and physical distancing scenarios. As well as estimating reduction in effective reproduction number, we estimated, for a given level of COVID-19 incidence, the number of contacts that would be newly quarantined each day under different strategies.

Results Under optimistic but plausible assumptions, we estimated that combined testing and tracing strategies would reduce transmission more than mass testing or self-isolation alone (50–65% compared to 2–30%). If limits are placed on gatherings outside of home/school/work (e.g. maximum of 4 daily contacts in other settings), then manual contact tracing of acquaintances only could have a similar effect on transmission reduction as detailed contact tracing. In a scenario where there were 10,000 new symptomatic cases per day, we estimated in most contact tracing strategies, 140,000 to 390,000 contacts would be newly quarantined each day.

Conclusions Consistent with previous modelling studies and country-specific COVID-19 responses to date, our analysis estimates that a high proportion of cases would need to self-isolate and a high proportion of their contacts to be successfully traced to ensure an effective reproduction number that is below one in the absence of other measures. If combined with moderate physical distancing measures, self-isolation and contact tracing would be more likely to achieve control.

Funding Wellcome Trust, EPSRC, European Commission.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by Wellcome Trust (206250/Z/17/Z), European Commission (101003688) and EPSRC (EP/N509620/1).

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • CMMID COVID-19 working group members (order selected at random): Jon C Emery, Graham Medley, James D Munday, Timothy W Russell, Quentin J Leclerc, Charlie Diamond, Simon R Procter, Amy Gimma, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Hamish P Gibbs, Alicia Rosello, Kevin van Zandvoort, Stéphane Hué, Sophie R Meakin, Arminder K Deol, Gwen Knight, Thibaut Jombart, Anna M Foss, Nikos I Bosse, Katherine E. Atkins, Billy J Quilty, Rachel Lowe, Kiesha Prem, Stefan Flasche, Carl A B Pearson, Rein M G J Houben, Emily S Nightingale, Akira Endo, Damien C Tully, Yang Liu, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Kathleen O’Reilly, Sebastian Funk, Rosalind M Eggo, Mark Jit, Eleanor M Rees, Joel Hellewell, Samuel Clifford, Christopher I Jarvis, Sam Abbott, Megan Auzenbergs, Nicholas G. Davies, David Simons

Data Availability

Data and code are fully available.

https://github.com/adamkucharski/2020-cov-tracing

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 29, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings
Adam Kucharski, Petra Klepac, Andrew Conlan, Stephen Kissler, Maria Tang, Hannah Fry, Julia Gog, John Edmunds, CMMID COVID-19 working group
medRxiv 2020.04.23.20077024; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077024
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings
Adam Kucharski, Petra Klepac, Andrew Conlan, Stephen Kissler, Maria Tang, Hannah Fry, Julia Gog, John Edmunds, CMMID COVID-19 working group
medRxiv 2020.04.23.20077024; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.23.20077024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (412)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (69)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (142)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4843)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (674)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (626)
  • Health Policy (318)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (203)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5326)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (328)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (685)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (114)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (205)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (778)
  • Public and Global Health (1810)
  • Radiology and Imaging (323)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)