ABSTRACT
Importance With USMLE Step 1 becoming pass/fail, subjective clinical evaluations will hold greater weight in residency applications. However, no longitudinal studies exist that examine the role of race in clinical success during medical training.
Objective Utilizing Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) as an objective marker of clinical achievement, I investigated the relationship between race and AOA membership at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine over a span of 15 years.
Design, Setting, and Participants To accomplish this retrospective, single center, multi-year cohort study, names of all Feinberg graduates between 2003 and 2018 were collected via the school’s public website. Images for each student were gathered by social media, assigned an ethnic identity by a blind evaluator, and confirmed by an unblinded evaluator. Finally, each name was verified against the AOA database to determine membership status.
Main Outcomes and Measures AOA membership among medical students of various racial groups at Feinberg.
Results From a 2,466 student body, there were 546 (22.1%) Eastern/Southeastern Asian, 123 (5.0%) African-American, 102 (4.1%) Hispanic/Latino, 399 (16.2%) South Asian, 59 (2.4%) Other, and 1205 (48.9%) Caucasian students, with 32 (1.3%) exclusions. Within this collective group, 428 students were inducted to AOA: 62 (14.5%) Eastern/Southeastern Asian, 4 (0.9%) African-American, 10 (2.3%) Hispanic/Latino, 70 (16.4%) South Asian, 10 (2.3%) Other, and 270 (63.1%) Caucasian students, with 2 (0.5%) exclusions. By class/year, the percentage of Caucasians inducted into AOA were higher than the class percent in 15 out of 16 classes, compared to 1 by Eastern/Southeastern Asians and 7 by South Asians. Odds ratio analysis demonstrated Eastern/Southeastern Asian (OR, 0.44; 99.67% CI, 0.28 – 0.69) and African-American (OR, 0.12; 99.67% CI, 0.03 – 0.53) students were at disadvantage relative to Caucasians for AOA membership.
Conclusion I revealed Eastern/Southeastern Asian and African-American students were statistically less likely to be selected for AOA compared to Caucasian counterparts. Additionally, Eastern/Southeastern Asian students were under-represented almost every year despite being the most represented minority demographic. These results demonstrate subjective bias in AOA membership for both under- and over-represented minorities and suggests the recent Step I paradigm shift may disproportionately affect certain students over others.
Question Which minority groups are disadvantaged compared to Caucasian counterparts for AOA membership?
Findings In this longitudinal, retrospective cohort study spanning fifteen years at Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, I found Caucasian students were 2 and 8 times more likely to obtain AOA membership than Eastern/Southeastern Asian and African-American medical students respectively.
Meaning Certain bias underlying AOA admission may exist and are possibly stable over time, which is concerning given the recent Step 1 policy changes and thus eventual shift away from objective evaluations in residency applications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author received no specific funding for this study.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Primary data are available and can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.