Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in the Netherlands: a prospective study

Hester A Gietema, Noortje Zelis, J Martijn Nobel, Lars JG Lambriks, Lieke B van Alphen, Astrid ML Oude Lashof, Joachim E Wildberger, Irene C Nelissen, View ORCID ProfilePatricia M Stassen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.20070441
Hester A Gietema
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
2GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noortje Zelis
3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
4CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Martijn Nobel
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
5School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars JG Lambriks
3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lieke B van Alphen
6Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
7School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Astrid ML Oude Lashof
6Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
8School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim E Wildberger
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
4CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene C Nelissen
3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia M Stassen
3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
7School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patricia M Stassen
  • For correspondence: p.stassen@mumc.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Early differentiation between emergency department (ED) patients with and without corona virus disease (COVID-19) is very important. Chest CT scan may be helpful in early diagnosing of COVID-19. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CT using RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 as reference standard and investigated reasons for discordant results between the two tests.

Methods In this prospective single centre study in the Netherlands, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a PCR upon arrival at the ED. CT results were compared with PCR test(s). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Discordant results were investigated using discharge diagnoses.

Results Between March 13th and March 24th 2020, 193 symptomatic ED patients were included. In total, 43.0% of patients had a positive PCR and 56.5% a positive CT, resulting in a sensitivity of 89.2%, specificity 68.2%, likelihoodratio (LR) + 2.81 and LR-0.16. Sensitivity was higher in patients with high risk pneumonia (CURB-65 score ≥3; n=17, 100%) and with sepsis (SOFA score ≥2; n=137, 95.5%).

Of the 35 patients (31.8%) with a suspicious CT and a negative PCR, 9 had another respiratory viral pathogen, and in 7 patients, COVID-19 was considered likely. One of nine patients with a non-suspicious CT and a positive PCR had developed symptoms within 48 hours before scanning.

Discussion The accuracy of chest CT in symptomatic ED patients is high, but used as a single diagnostic test, CT can not safely diagnose or exclude COVID-19. However, CT can be used as a quick first screening tool.

Key messages

What is the key question?

  • We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the chest CT scan using the PCR test for diagnosing COVID-19 as reference.

What is the bottom line?

  • Sensitivity of chest CT is high, especially in severely ill patients, but with moderate specificity, which could in part be explained by other respiratory viruses and false negative PCR tests.

Why read on?

Early differentation between patients with and without COVID-19 is extremely important, and CT scan should be considered a quick screening test, and may help to overcome suboptimal sensitivity of PCR tests.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This is not a clinical trial.

Funding Statement

no funding applicable

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are available

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 24, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in the Netherlands: a prospective study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in the Netherlands: a prospective study
Hester A Gietema, Noortje Zelis, J Martijn Nobel, Lars JG Lambriks, Lieke B van Alphen, Astrid ML Oude Lashof, Joachim E Wildberger, Irene C Nelissen, Patricia M Stassen
medRxiv 2020.04.22.20070441; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.20070441
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
CT in relation to RT-PCR in diagnosing COVID-19 in the Netherlands: a prospective study
Hester A Gietema, Noortje Zelis, J Martijn Nobel, Lars JG Lambriks, Lieke B van Alphen, Astrid ML Oude Lashof, Joachim E Wildberger, Irene C Nelissen, Patricia M Stassen
medRxiv 2020.04.22.20070441; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.20070441

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (110)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (422)
  • Epidemiology (8989)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (420)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1959)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (402)
  • Health Informatics (1329)
  • Health Policy (660)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10809)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1830)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (999)
  • Ophthalmology (298)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (580)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1904)
  • Public and Global Health (4123)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (549)
  • Rheumatology (225)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (81)