Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening

Sehj Kashyap, Saurabh Gombar, Steve Yadlowsky, Alison Callahan, Jason Fries, Benjamin A Pinsky, View ORCID ProfileNigam H Shah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20072017
Sehj Kashyap
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saurabh Gombar
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sgombar{at}stanford.edu
Steve Yadlowsky
2Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Callahan
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Fries
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin A Pinsky
3Departments of Pathology and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nigam H Shah
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nigam H Shah
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic requires accurate forecasting of health system capacity requirements using readily available inputs. We examined whether testing and hospitalization data could help quantify the anticipated burden on the health system given shelter-in-place (SIP) order.

We find a marked slowdown in the hospitalization rate within ten days of SIP even as cases continued to rise. We also find a shift towards younger patients in the age distribution of those testing positive for COVID-19 over the four weeks of SIP. The impact of this shift is a divergence between increasing positive case confirmations and slowing new hospitalizations, both of which affects the demand on health systems.

Without using local hospitalization rates and the age distribution of positive patients, current models are likely to overestimate the resource burden of COVID-19. It is imperative that health systems start using these data to quantify effects of SIP and aid reopening planning.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We acknowledge support from NLM R01LM011369-07, the CEO’s office at Stanford Health Care, the Stanford Medicine Program for AI in Healthcare as well as the Departments of Medicine and Pathology at Stanford.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Patient-level healthcare data are not publicly available. Code to reproduce technical aspects of the analysis is available from the corresponding author by request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 23, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening
Sehj Kashyap, Saurabh Gombar, Steve Yadlowsky, Alison Callahan, Jason Fries, Benjamin A Pinsky, Nigam H Shah
medRxiv 2020.04.19.20072017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20072017
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Measure what matters: counts of hospitalized patients are a better metric for health system capacity planning for a reopening
Sehj Kashyap, Saurabh Gombar, Steve Yadlowsky, Alison Callahan, Jason Fries, Benjamin A Pinsky, Nigam H Shah
medRxiv 2020.04.19.20072017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20072017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (431)
  • Allergy and Immunology (757)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13385)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5158)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3276)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14637)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (728)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)