Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Are German endoscopy units prepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? A nationwide survey

View ORCID ProfileJakob Garbe, View ORCID ProfileStephan Eisenmann, View ORCID ProfileClara S. Heidemann, View ORCID ProfileMarko Damm, View ORCID ProfileSebastian Krug, View ORCID ProfileSteffen Walter, View ORCID ProfileFrank Lammert, View ORCID ProfileKaid Darwiche, View ORCID ProfilePatrick Michl, View ORCID ProfileJonas Rosendahl
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20071340
Jakob Garbe
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jakob Garbe
Stephan Eisenmann
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephan Eisenmann
Clara S. Heidemann
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clara S. Heidemann
Marko Damm
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marko Damm
Sebastian Krug
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastian Krug
Steffen Walter
2Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steffen Walter
Frank Lammert
3Department of Internal Medicine II, Saarland University Hospital, Germany
4For the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frank Lammert
Kaid Darwiche
5West German Lung Center, Ruhrlandklinik, University Essen-Duisburg, Germany
6For the German Society for Pneumology (DGP)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kaid Darwiche
Patrick Michl
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrick Michl
Jonas Rosendahl
1Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Halle, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Rosendahl
  • For correspondence: jonas.rosendahl{at}uk-halle.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic challenges health care systems worldwide. In this situation, guidelines for health care professionals in endoscopy units with increased risk of infection from inhalation of airborne droplets, conjunctival contact and faeces are urgently needed. Recently, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the German Society for Pneumology (DGP) issued recommendations. However, real-world data on the conditions and requirements of endoscopy units to adhere to this guidance are missing.

Design We conducted an internet-based survey among German endoscopy units from all levels of care from April 1st to 7th, 2020. The survey comprised 33 questions and was distributed electronically by the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) and the DGP.

Results In total, 656 endoscopy units completed the survey. Overall, 253 units (39%) cancelled fewer than 40% of their procedures. Of note, private practices cancelled less procedures than hospital-based units. Complete separation of high-risk and COVID-19 positive patients was achieved in only 20% of the units. Procedural measures were well adopted, with 91% of the units systematically identifying patients at risk and 85% using risk-adapted personal protective equipment (PPE). For the future, shortages in PPE (81%), staff (69%) and relevant financial losses (77%) were expected.

Conclusion Concise definitions of non-urgent, elective interventions and endoscopic surveillance strategies are needed to better guide endoscopic activity and intervention cancellations. In the short term, a lack of PPE can constitute considerable impairment of endoscopy units’ operability and patient outcomes.

SUMMARY BOX

  1. What is already known about this subject?

    • - Recent data indicate a potentially important role of the gastrointestinal tract in the spreading of COVID-19.

    • - Endoscopy units and their personnel are at high risk to be exposed to and to distribute COVID-19 infections.

    • - Several societies have formulated guidance for endoscopy units in the current situation, but their feasibility is unclear.

  2. What are the new findings?

    • - Endoscopic activity seems not to be limited to urgent interventions across all units as 39% of all endoscopy units cancelled less than 40% of procedures.

    • - For most endoscopy units, structural conditions are insufficient to realize a complete separation of high-risk patients, which can be guaranteed by only 20% of the units.

    • - The willingness to adhere to the recommendations is very high, as most endoscopy units adopted their procedures accordingly. Shortage of personal protective equipment is a critical concern in many units.

  3. How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

    • - An update of the current recommendations to refine practicable measures for the majority of endoscopic units is warranted.

    • - A concise definition of non-urgent or elective procedures as well as postponement strategies and intervals are of utmost importance, since current data implicate that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract may be critical for public health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

There is no funding to be reported in connections with this publication.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Deidentified aggregate parcipant data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

  • Abbreviations

    COVID-19
    Coronavirus disease 2019
    DGP
    German Society for Pneumology
    DGVS
    German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases
    ESGE
    European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    GI
    gastrointestinal
    PPE
    Personal protective equipment
    SARS-CoV-2
    severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 23, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Are German endoscopy units prepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? A nationwide survey
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Are German endoscopy units prepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? A nationwide survey
    Jakob Garbe, Stephan Eisenmann, Clara S. Heidemann, Marko Damm, Sebastian Krug, Steffen Walter, Frank Lammert, Kaid Darwiche, Patrick Michl, Jonas Rosendahl
    medRxiv 2020.04.19.20071340; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20071340
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Are German endoscopy units prepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? A nationwide survey
    Jakob Garbe, Stephan Eisenmann, Clara S. Heidemann, Marko Damm, Sebastian Krug, Steffen Walter, Frank Lammert, Kaid Darwiche, Patrick Michl, Jonas Rosendahl
    medRxiv 2020.04.19.20071340; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.19.20071340

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Gastroenterology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (430)
    • Allergy and Immunology (756)
    • Anesthesia (221)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (3292)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
    • Dermatology (279)
    • Emergency Medicine (479)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
    • Epidemiology (13374)
    • Forensic Medicine (19)
    • Gastroenterology (899)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
    • Geriatric Medicine (482)
    • Health Economics (783)
    • Health Informatics (3268)
    • Health Policy (1140)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
    • Hematology (431)
    • HIV/AIDS (1017)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14627)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
    • Medical Education (477)
    • Medical Ethics (127)
    • Nephrology (523)
    • Neurology (4925)
    • Nursing (262)
    • Nutrition (730)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
    • Oncology (2524)
    • Ophthalmology (724)
    • Orthopedics (281)
    • Otolaryngology (347)
    • Pain Medicine (323)
    • Palliative Medicine (90)
    • Pathology (543)
    • Pediatrics (1302)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
    • Primary Care Research (557)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
    • Public and Global Health (7504)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1705)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
    • Respiratory Medicine (980)
    • Rheumatology (480)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
    • Sports Medicine (424)
    • Surgery (548)
    • Toxicology (72)
    • Transplantation (236)
    • Urology (205)