ABSTRACT
Aims Circulating biomarkers are commonly used in diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in clinical practice. However, the diagnostic and prognostic potential of current biomarkers in HFpEF remain unclear.
Methods and results We conducted a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE and SCOPUS (1900 to January 2020) databases of all diagnostic (n=1,104) and prognostic (n=53,497) biomarkers investigated in people with HFpEF. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) displayed satisfactory sensitivity (0.81, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.85; I2=0) and specificity (0.86, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.89; I2=16.9%) for the diagnosis of HFpEF. Natriuretic peptides (NPs), including N-terminal pro BNP (NT-proBNP) and BNP, were associated with over two-fold increased risk of mortality (NT-proBNP: HR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.69 to 3.06, I2=87.6%; BNP: HR=3.01, 95% CI: 1.27 to 7.21, I2=97.2%), hospitalisation (NT-proBNP: HR=3.54, 95% CI: 2.83 to 4.43, I2=83.4%), and a composite event of both (NT-proBNP: HR=2.55, 95% CI: 2.13 to 3.05, I2=78.1%; BNP: HR=2.28, 95% CI: 1.42 to 3.69, I2=75.8%) in people with HFpEF. Interestingly, Galectin-3 (Gal-3) (sensitivity: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.75, I2=86.7%; specificity: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.85, I2=68.6%) and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) (sensitivity: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.64, I2=88.1%; specificity: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.68, I2=69.5%) showed limited diagnostic potential of HFpEF.
Conclusion Amongst currently available biomarkers, BNP remains the most reliable diagnostic marker of HFpEF. Although there was high heterogeneity between the studies included, BNP or NT-proBNP could also have promising prognostic potential in HFpEF.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded through the Honour’s student fund provided by the Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All the data is included in the paper.
