Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE

Amy V. Mueller, Matthew J. Eden, Jessica M. Oakes, Chiara Bellini, Loretta A. Fernandez
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567
Amy V. Mueller
1Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Marine and Environmental Sciences Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Eden
2Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica M. Oakes
2Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiara Bellini
2Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loretta A. Fernandez
1Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Marine and Environmental Sciences Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: l.fernandez@northeastern.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, cloth masks are being used to control the spread of virus, but the efficacy of these loose-fitting masks is not well known. Here, tools and methods typically used to assess tight-fitting respirators were modified to quantify the efficacy of community- and commercially-produced fabric masks as PPE. Two particle counters concurrently sample ambient air and air inside the masks; mask performance is evaluated by mean particle removal efficiency and statistical variability when worn as designed and with a nylon overlayer, to independently assess fit and material. Worn as designed both commercial surgical masks and cloth masks had widely varying effectiveness (53-75% and 28-90% filtration efficiency, respectively). Most surgical-style masks improved with the nylon overlayer, indicating poor fit. This rapid testing method uses widely available hardware, requires only a few calculations from collected data, and provides both a holistic and aspect-wise evaluation of mask performance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for the this work.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conceptualization, L. A. F. and A. V. M; Methodology, L. A. F. and A. V. M; Formal Analysis, A. V. M. and C. B.; Investigation, L. A. F., A. V. M., M. J. E., J. M. O., and C. B., Writing – Original Draft, L. A. F. and A. V. M.; Writing – Review & Editing, A. V. M., C. B., and L. A. F.

Data Availability

Data referred to in this manuscript is available upon request from the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE
Amy V. Mueller, Matthew J. Eden, Jessica M. Oakes, Chiara Bellini, Loretta A. Fernandez
medRxiv 2020.04.17.20069567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE
Amy V. Mueller, Matthew J. Eden, Jessica M. Oakes, Chiara Bellini, Loretta A. Fernandez
medRxiv 2020.04.17.20069567; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Occupational and Environmental Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (496)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1110)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (275)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (505)
  • Epidemiology (9796)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2327)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1567)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (608)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (508)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11669)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2154)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (340)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (519)
  • Oncology (1185)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (221)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (314)
  • Pediatrics (699)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (303)
  • Primary Care Research (268)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2195)
  • Public and Global Health (4685)
  • Radiology and Imaging (786)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (458)
  • Respiratory Medicine (625)
  • Rheumatology (276)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (212)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)